WOUTER DE SWARDT, SERGEANT STEVENS' & SERGEANT DUNA'S CHRONOLOGICAL TIMELINE
The Chronology of Criminal Conduct by Wouter de Swardt & Sergeant Stevens
This page presents a detailed, chronologically structured record of criminal actions, procedural violations, and gross misconduct carried out by Sergeant Stevens of SAPS, in full coordination with private actors acting in their own financial interest.
Spanning a period of more than 24 months, this timeline documents more than 200 individual events, compiled and referenced to establish a factual, evidence-based account of:
-
Arrests executed unlawfully, with no warrant, no investigation, and no lawful basis
-
Fabricated affidavits designed to mislead prosecutors and secure detention
-
Illegal seizures of property and personal documentation, including the theft of passports
-
Deliberate, strategic coordination between SAPS officers and private parties to obstruct justice and influence civil outcomes
-
The misuse of SAPS resources, including tactical units, to execute unlawful raids
-
The intentional extension of detentions through false representations in court
-
The systemic refusal to return seized assets and documentation despite formal requests and the absence of any valid grounds for continued retention
This is not an abstract timeline. It is the operational record of a criminal strategy executed through SAPS uniform. It does not summarise. It presents, in sequence, the dates, facts, and actions of a campaign carried out under colour of law — one that facilitated theft, sabotage, judicial interference, and the illegal imprisonment of the target.
This is not a narrative. It is a prosecutorial record awaiting legal reckoning.
Scroll down to access the full timeline.
Both magistrates rejected the arrest and seizure warrants. SAPS executed the operation anyway — without lawful authority, and with the landlord’s private agent leading the raid.
FACT FILE: UNLAWFUL ARREST, WARRANTLESS RAID & STRATEGIC DETENTION
On 14 December 2022, Sergeant Stevens led an unlawful arrest and coordinated raid on Darren Russell’s residence — executed without a warrant, despite four prior magistrate refusals. Backed by an armed tactical unit and conducted with no lawful justification, the arrest was timed to block Russell’s appearance in court. His detention lasted three months in Pollsmoor Prison. No valid docket, no charge sheet, and no legal process preceded the action. Keys seized during the raid were later handed directly to the landlords, enabling the illegal takeover of the properties.
Operation 14 December – An Unlawful Military-Style Raid
On the morning of 14 December 2022, SAPS officers officially led by Sergeant Stevens, although actually led by Wouter de Swardt, and accompanied by members of the Bellville Commercial Crime Unit, staged a full-scale tactical raid on Darren Russell’s residence in Hout Bay. The operation included members of the SAPS Special Task Force, a military-grade SWAT unit generally deployed only in extreme hostage or terrorism scenarios.
No valid arrest warrant existed. No magistrate had granted approval — in fact, four separate warrant applications had already been denied. There was no docket. No forensic report. No evidence.
Despite this, the raid was executed at full scale — with blown entry doors, automatic weapons, and multiple officers deployed across properties — not in the pursuit of justice, but in the execution of a private seizure campaign.
Most alarming, the individual managing the entire operation on-site was not an officer of SAPS, but Wouter de Swardt, a private investigator appointed by the Consortium, who took control of both the raid at the residence and a simultaneous illegal operation at 16 Leirmans Road.
The legal authority for the operation did not exist. The decision to proceed was not a misjudgement — it was a conscious bypassing of legal process in service of private financial interests.
FACT FILE: SAPS SPECIAL TASK FORCE DEPLOYED FOR PRIVATE EVICTION RAID
On 14 December 2022, Sergeant Stevens coordinated an SAPS operation deploying multiple officers, senior command staff, and the Special Task Force to arrest Darren Russell — despite no signed warrant, no legal basis, and rejections from two magistrates.
The operation was directed on-site by private investigator Wouter de Swardt, who simultaneously executed a secondary illegal takeover at Leirmans Road — resulting in the seizure of properties, unauthorized access, and the unlawful transfer of keys to landlords.
Unlawful Arrest & Strategic Detention – The Real Goal of 14 December
The purpose of the 14 December operation was not investigation. It was not even arrest in the traditional sense. It was strategic removal — executed to eliminate Darren Russell from legal proceedings scheduled just days later.
Despite the absence of a warrant and the clear refusals from multiple magistrates, Sergeant Stevens proceeded to carry out the arrest using a piggybacked search and seizure warrant, which itself made no mention of arrest and had no judicial basis for the operation as conducted.
Upon arrest, Russell was detained without immediate access to counsel. He was held in Pollsmoor Prison, one of the world’s most notoriously dangerous prisons, for three months, pending a bail hearing that was repeatedly frustrated by SAPS and by false submissions made by the arresting officers.
Key to this obstruction was the fabrication of a bogus immigration charge — manufactured by Stevens, using a passport that had been previously stolen by Paula Disberry, passed to Wouter de Swardt, and then to SAPS. The immigration narrative was later used to label Russell “a flight risk,” despite the fact that his visa had been sabotaged by the very parties engineering the arrest.
Meanwhile, while Russell was imprisoned, Keith and Inge Broad — with the full support of de Swardt — unlawfully entered, occupied, and transferred control of properties, seizing keys handed to them by SAPS officers and eliminating all practical ability for Russell to contest their takeover in court.
Media24, in coordinated timing, released fabricated narratives justifying the arrest — presenting it as the exposure of a rental “scammer,” while failing to disclose that no warrant had been issued and that no evidence had been submitted to support the charges.
FACT FILE: ARREST WITH NO WARRANT; IMMIGRATION FRAUD FABRICATED TO BLOCK BAIL
In September 2021, impressed by my success in Camps Bay, agent Gail Broad offered me a lease on 16 Leirmans Road, a Llandudno villa owned by her cousin, Keith Broad.
The agreement was to renovate the property to attract high-end tourists, with a five-year lease ensuring I could recover my investment and earn a profit.
The Property Grabs – Seizures Disguised as Policing
With Darren Russell incarcerated, the real objective of the 14 December operation was executed: a coordinated and pre-planned illegal seizure of properties, orchestrated by Wouter de Swardt and carried out with the full cooperation of Sergeant Stevens and SAPS.
At 16 Leirmans Road, while SAPS were raiding Russell’s home, de Swardt conducted a simultaneous illegal operation — seizing control of the property, arresting the housekeeper, confiscating the keys, and later handing them directly to Keith and Inge Broad, the landlords who had engineered the campaign from the outset.
At 32 Fisherman’s Bend, minutes after Russell’s arrest, the landlord’s PA, two of his managers, and finally the landlord himself entered the property — all timed precisely to SAPS’s withdrawal. The keys had been obtained not from legal process, but from Sergeant Stevens, who passed them to de Swardt, who in turn handed them to the landlord in a private meeting at the house.
These were not evictions. These were not repossessions. These were criminal seizures disguised as policing — made possible only because the lawful occupant had been removed through an unlawful arrest.
Media24 did not report the illegality, the timing, or the coordination. Instead, it echoed the same narrative: that the properties had been “reclaimed” from a fraudster.
FACT FILES: EXPOSING THE LIES, REVEALING THE TRUTH
On 14 December 2022, while Darren Russell was unlawfully detained, properties at 16 Leirmans Road and 32 Fisherman’s Bend were seized in coordinated operations led by Wouter de Swardt, with SAPS complicity.
House staff were arrested, keys confiscated, and landlords handed control of properties within hours. No warrant. No court order. No lawful basis.
The Unlawful Arrest Disguised as a Seizure – How a Rejected Warrant Became a Police Operation
On 14 December 2022, Sergeant Stevens and SAPS officers carried out a large-scale operation against Darren Russell — including a tactical raid, arrest, and property seizure — but did so without any lawful arrest warrant.
The arrest was unlawfully executed under cover of a seizure warrant, which had itself been denied by at least two magistrates in the weeks prior. When lawful approval could not be obtained, Stevens escalated the request internally, bypassing the judiciary and securing a signature from within SAPS — a process that was both procedurally unlawful and constituted a manipulation of urgent-warrant protocol.
The operation was then justified after the fact using this unlawfully obtained seizure warrant, despite the fact that a seizure warrant does not constitute legal authority to arrest. No formal charges had been laid. No docket existed. No investigation had been conducted.
This manoeuvre enabled:
-
A SWAT-style forced entry
-
The illegal arrest and removal of the target
-
Seizure of assets and legal files
-
And the immediate transfer of property access to individuals acting on behalf of the Consortium
This case represents not just abuse at the level of a single officer — it exposes a chain of complicity that extended up the SAPS hierarchy, where unlawful warrant processing was greenlit from within the very institution tasked with oversight.
This unlawful operation benefited not the state, but a network of private individuals, namely:
-
Keith and Inge Broad, landlords of 16 Leirmans Road, where de Swardt staged a simultaneous unlawful operation
-
Raj Moonsamy, Rajeev Vasant Sheth, and Krashani Deoshini Naidoo, owners of 32 Fisherman’s Bend, who seized the property hours later with SAPS-provided keys
This pattern of behaviour — illegal warrants, unlawful arrest, and immediate property transfers — was not an overreach. It was a coordinated private capture of state power, executed through Stevens’ authority and de Swardt’s field coordination.
FACT FILES: EXPOSING THE LIES, REVEALING THE TRUTH
On 14 December 2022, Sergeant Stevens and private agent Wouter de Swardt bypassed the courts to obtain an internal SAPS seizure warrant, following two magistrate refusals.
With no valid arrest warrant, they executed a large-scale raid, arresting Russell and enabling immediate unlawful entry and takeover by Keith Broad & Inge Broad (16 Leirmans) and - Raj Moonsamy, Rajeev Vasant Sheth, and Krashani Deoshini Naidoo, (32 Fisherman’s Bend).
The Bail That Was Granted — Then Stolen by Lies
After being unlawfully arrested on 14 December 2022, Darren Russell was detained at Hout Bay Police Station for nearly a full week — a clear violation of the 48-hour maximum holding period under South African law.
When he was finally brought before the Wynberg Magistrate’s Court, bail was granted in open court. The magistrate, having reviewed the arrest, documentation, and absence of charges, set bail at R2,000 — a clear signal that the matter lacked prosecutorial weight. Russell was released from the dock, bail formally approved.
But before he could leave the courthouse, Wouter de Swardt panicked. He made direct contact with Sergeant Stevens, and together they rushed to the lead prosecutor, demanding the release be stopped.
They then presented the court with three fabricated claims:
-
That five new charges had just been added — untrue.
-
That Russell was “wanted for serious matters in Paarl” — a complete fiction; Russell had never been charged, investigated, or even present in Paarl.
-
That Russell was a flight risk — despite the issue having been resolved at a prior bail application, and despite the fact that Sergeant Stevens had already unlawfully seized the original passport, and very likely had possession of the second stolen passport by that time.
The magistrate — without hearing further argument, and in what can only be described as an extreme violation of due process — rescinded the bail order with no hearing, no new evidence, and no time for the defence to respond.
The ruling was revoked as casually as a change to a restaurant order. With that, Russell was transferred to Pollsmoor Prison, where he remained for the following three months, solely on the back of fabricated assertions and deliberate prosecutorial manipulation.
FACT FILE: BAIL GRANTED, THEN REVOKED BASED ON FALSE CLAIMS BY WOUTER DE SWARDT AND SERGEANT STEVENS
After being held beyond the 48-hour limit, Darren Russell was granted bail of R2,000 by the Wynberg Magistrate’s Court. Before he could exit the building, Wouter de Swardt and Sergeant Stevens intervened, presenting false claims of new charges, unrelated Paarl warrants, and fabricated flight risk concerns.
The magistrate rescinded the bail without process, sending Russell to Pollsmoor Prison. All allegations used to reverse the bail order were later proven false.
Bail Obstruction & Charge Fabrication – How SAPS Delayed Justice at All Costs
With Darren Russell unlawfully detained, Sergeant Stevens and Wouter de Swardt engaged in a systematic effort to delay or prevent the granting of bail — despite the absence of any valid charge, docket, or investigation.
Over a period of weeks:
-
Charge sheets were repeatedly changed or withdrawn, often the day before scheduled hearings.
-
SAPS submitted false documentation suggesting an ongoing investigation — despite no docket and no appointed detective.
-
Bail hearings were frustrated,
-
At key moments, a fabricated “immigration docket” was invoked — not because of a real violation, but because of a stolen passport previously withheld by private actors aligned with the landlords.
-
The resulting delay kept Russell detained in Pollsmoor Prison for three months, without any legal justification.
The conduct of Stevens and de Swardt — acting in concert with Keith Broad, Inge Broad, Raj Moonsamy, Rajeev Vasant Sheth, and Krashani Deoshini Naidoo — was designed not to initiate justice, but to suppress it. Their goal was to secure the asset takeover, silence the target, and collapse the defence infrastructure before any legal rebuttal could be mounted.
FACT FILE: SAPS ALTERED CHARGES TO BLOCK BAIL, USED FAKE IMMIGRATION DOCKET
While Darren Russell was unlawfully detained, Sergeant Stevens and Wouter de Swardt repeatedly altered charge sheets, submitted false case data, and delayed bail hearings by design.
A bogus immigration violation — enabled by the earlier theft of Russell’s passport by private associates — was used to falsely classify him as a flight risk. This tactic enabled near three months’ detention with no valid legal basis.
Charges Collapse, Bogus Immigration Charge Introduced in Desperation
Following Darren Russell’s unlawful arrest on 14 December 2022 and illegal detention at Hout Bay Police Station for nearly a week, bail was initially granted on 19 December at R2,000 — only to be rescinded minutes later after Wouter de Swardt and Sergeant Stevens submitted a series of fabricated claims to the magistrate.
Russell was remanded to Pollsmoor Prison, where on 6 January, 2 February, and again on 9 February, Sergeant Stevens appeared before court requesting additional time for investigation — despite no valid charges, no evidence, and no docket.
But the key moment came on 13 March 2023: the date scheduled for Russell’s formal bail application hearing. Before the hearing could even begin, Russell’s legal counsel sat with the prosecutors. The result?
All five criminal charges were dropped. Not challenged — dropped outright. No evidence. No basis. No trial.
In a last-ditch attempt to keep Russell in detention, Sergeant Stevens immediately introduced a bogus immigration charge, relying on a false claim of visa violation — despite the fact that his own SAPS unit had been holding both of Russell’s passports unlawfully for months. This tactic was clearly timed to obstruct Russell’s presence at the final hearing of Case 7902 scheduled for the very next day, where his testimony would have directly undermined the Consortium’s claims.
The magistrate rejected the immigration pretext as insufficient grounds for detention.
Undeterred, Sergeant Stevens demanded bail be set at R100,000 — a transparent attempt to block release by unaffordable means. The defence attorney intervened, arguing that such a figure amounted to a de facto denial of bail, and the magistrate agreed. Bail was set at R10,000, and Russell was released the following day.
Before closing proceedings, the magistrate formally called for an investigation into SAPS conduct — the second magistrate to do so during the span of these events.
FACT FILES: EXPOSING THE LIES, REVEALING THE TRUTH
On 13 March 2023, prosecutors dropped all five criminal charges against Darren Russell. In response, Sergeant Stevens fabricated a visa violation to keep Russell imprisoned — despite the fact that both of Russell’s passports had been seized by SAPS.
The tactic was designed to prevent Russell’s appearance at the next day’s Case 7902 hearing. The magistrate rejected the ruse, criticised Stevens’ conduct, and called for a formal investigation — the second such call from the bench.
The False Affidavit – Retrospective Perjury to Justify an Immigration Charge
After all initial charges collapsed on 13 March 2023, Sergeant Stevens, acting in coordination with Wouter de Swardt, lodged a false affidavit into the docket — claiming that during Russell’s arrest on 14 December 2022, he had discussed immigration status and that Russell had admitted to overstaying his visa and lacking documentation.
This statement was not just fabricated. It was chronologically impossible:
-
No such conversation took place during the arrest, as confirmed in multiple statements, records, and the original affidavit Stevens himself submitted on 18 December 2022 — four days after the arrest.
-
That original affidavit makes no reference whatsoever to immigration, visas, or documentation.
-
No mention of an immigration violation appears in any SAPS record, court filing, or prison documentation until after the charges had collapsed in March.
-
Pollsmoor Prison intake forms, charge sheets, and the station docket all reflect only three fraud charges — the original basis for arrest.
In fact, the only record of “immigration” concerns came after bail had been granted — when Stevens and de Swardt scrambled to manufacture a new basis for detention in order to block Russell’s attendance at the 7902 hearing the following day.
This affidavit represents perjury in its most strategic form: a law enforcement officer falsifying a sworn statement in order to retrofit legal cover for an illegal detention campaign that had already collapsed under scrutiny.
FACT FILE: RETROACTIVE IMMIGRATION CLAIM CONFLICTS WITH SAPS'S OWN RECORD
After all criminal charges were dropped, Sergeant Stevens filed a backdated affidavit claiming Darren Russell admitted to overstaying his visa at the time of his arrest.
But Stevens’ earlier 18 December affidavit includes no mention of immigration, nor do the arrest warrants, charge sheets, or Pollsmoor intake records. This attempt to revive detention through fabricated affidavit content constitutes perjury and unlawful obstruction.
The Immigration Charge Collapses – Prosecutors Overrule de Swardt and Stevens
After nearly three months of fabricated charges, engineered delays, and procedural obstruction, the final tactic used to keep Darren Russell in prison was dismantled — not by SAPS, but by senior prosecutors who recognised the immigration charge for what it was: a false construction with no legal basis.
Introduced by Sergeant Stevens on 13 March 2023, the immigration charge was transparently designed to extend Russell’s imprisonment after all five criminal charges had been dropped by the prosecution that same morning. The alleged violation relied on passports that Stevens had been unlawfully holding for months, and which had been stolen originally by private parties, including Paula Disberry and passed to Wouter de Swardt.
There was no investigative process. No verification with Home Affairs. No formal documentation preceding the charge. It was simply added to the docket — as a tool to obstruct Russell’s scheduled testimony in Case 7902 the following day, where his presence would have exposed the foundational lies behind the property seizures.
Despite this, the immigration claim progressed. It was listed for preliminary hearing. A court date was set. Prosecutorial inertia meant that, unless actively challenged, the case would move forward — turning a known fabrication into a legal threat with real consequences.
To avert this outcome, Russell’s legal team submitted evidence directly to senior prosecutorial leadership — going over the heads of both Stevens and the local prosecutors who had facilitated the scheme. Only then was the case reviewed, cross-referenced, and abandoned.
On official record, the senior prosecutor refused to proceed with the immigration docket. The charge was withdrawn without argument — an implicit recognition that it was built on unlawful conduct, falsified narrative, and overt abuse of SAPS infrastructure by Stevens and de Swardt.
This was not justice delayed. It was justice nearly dismantled — saved only by the refusal to allow falsehood to pass unchallenged.
FACT FILE: IMMIGRATION CHARGE ABANDONED BY SENIOR PROSECUTOR AS FABRICATED
After criminal charges collapsed on 13 March 2023, Sergeant Stevens filed a false immigration charge to continue imprisonment. The case progressed until senior prosecutors were presented with evidence of fabrication and procedural abuse.
The charge was dropped without argument, marking the final collapse of the SAPS-led campaign against Darren Russell — and confirming the role of Wouter de Swardt and Stevens in orchestrating a criminal misuse of process.
Conclusion – What This Timeline Is, and What It Demands
This is not a retelling. It is not an interpretation. This is a documented chronological record of criminal conduct, carried out by a state officer — Sergeant Stevens — in operational partnership with a private agent — Wouter de Swardt — on behalf of individuals with financial stakes in the outcome: Keith Broad, Inge Broad, Raj Moonsamy, Rajeev Vasant Sheth, and Krashani Deoshini Naidoo.
At every turn, SAPS infrastructure was used not to uphold law, but to dismantle it — from unlawful arrest to evidence manipulation, property seizure to affidavit fraud, prolonged detention to fabricated immigration charges.
Two separate magistrates called for formal investigations. Multiple oversight bodies received formal complaints. And still, no one acted.
This page exists because the legal system did not.
It exists because public institutions refused to act on facts.
And it exists because this is not an isolated incident — but the exposed machinery of a wider pattern of state-backed corruption, where police, prosecutors, and private interests operated as a singular mechanism of fraud, enforced through uniform and legitimised by inaction.
The timeline below is the legal record they chose to ignore.
Use it. Investigate it. Reference it.
It is a roadmap, an archive, and a call for justice.
FACT FILE: FINAL CHARGE DISMISSED BY PROSECUTORS — CONFIRMING TOTAL FABRICATION
The last remaining charge against Darren Russell — a fabricated immigration violation — was formally dropped after senior prosecutors reviewed direct evidence bypassing both Sergeant Stevens and Wouter de Swardt.
This final collapse confirmed that every charge filed had been unfounded, procedurally tainted, or outright false, concluding a campaign of unlawful detention carried out through SAPS authority and private instruction.
The Significance Of The Misconduct
There are few crimes more egregious — or more corrosive — than a police officer using the machinery of law enforcement not to uphold justice, but to deliberately manufacture injustice. To weaponise the criminal justice system to conduct unlawful acts under the cover of legality is not just an abuse of power; it is a betrayal of the very purpose of that power.
What occurred here was not limited to one criminal charge or courtroom. The justice system was used to interfere with — and actively sabotage — proceedings in the civil courts. It was used to bypass and nullify statutory protections for tenants. And it was used to override constitutional rights not through argument or legislation, but by brute procedural manipulation.
By abusing the authority entrusted to him, Sergeant Stevens succeeded — albeit temporarily — in doing what no police officer should be able to do: overruling both judicial decisions and parliamentary protections. He didn’t enforce the law; he made the law irrelevant.
The police are meant to uphold the laws passed by Parliament — and interpreted, scrutinised, and applied by the courts. They are not meant to legitimise illegal conduct on behalf of connected private actors. They are not meant to make state power available to those with the right relationships.
Any one of the criminal acts committed by Sergeant Stevens — and some of his colleagues — would, if committed by a private citizen, result in prosecution. That accountability has yet to come is not a reflection of innocence, but of the extraordinary difficulty in holding SAPS accountable, even when the evidence is overwhelming.
The acts committed by those named in this timeline span fraud, perjury, illegal eviction, malicious prosecution, embezzlement, assault, obstruction of justice, and — at its most chilling — a conspiracy to drug, torture, and murder, in pursuit of financial theft. The central role of Sergeant Stevens in enabling, authorising, and operationalising that campaign cannot be overstated.
FACT FILE: POLICE ABUSE THAT OVERRULED COURTS, PARLIAMENT & THE LAW ITSELF
Through fabricated charges, procedural manipulation, and abuse of SAPS authority, Sergeant Stevens, acting in coordination with Wouter de Swardt, bypassed two magistrates, ignored statutory protections, and enabled the illegal seizure of homes and assets.
Their actions overrode the roles of Parliament and the judiciary, weaponising police power to impose lawless outcomes on behalf of private parties — a blueprint for state capture in uniform.
Serg Stevens's & Serg Duna's Chronological Timelines
This section provides a detailed account of the events involving Sergeant Stevens, Sergeant Duna, and their coordinated activities in collaboration with private individuals, which resulted in numerous legal violations. The timelines below focus on the deliberate misuse of state resources, unlawful actions, and corrupt practices perpetrated by these officers.
Key Timelines
-
Corruption & Criminality Timeline
This timeline tracks incidents specifically tied to the corrupt involvement of SAPS officers, particularly Sergeant Stevens and Sergeant Duna, often at the behest of private investigator Mr. Wouter de Swardt. Events highlight the manipulation of the justice system to facilitate illegal arrests, evictions, and other offenses. -
Timeline of Attacks
Documenting the assaults on finances, liberty, reputation, and personal safety, this timeline showcases the systematic and relentless nature of the attacks coordinated by these officers and their accomplices. -
Comprehensive Timeline
A full chronology of events, detailing over 230 incidents, documents, and occurrences that illustrate the scale and scope of the campaign waged against the target.
Significant Patterns and Incidents
-
Persistent Misuse of State Resources
Both Stevens and Duna leveraged SAPS resources to support private agendas, including illegal evictions, fabricated charges, and the obstruction of justice. -
Coordinated Efforts and Collusion
Evidence highlights deep collaboration between Stevens, Duna, and private individuals like Mr. de Swardt. Actions included manipulating dockets, securing fraudulent arrest warrants, and interfering with judicial proceedings. -
Fabrication and Manipulation
Charges were frequently fabricated or inflated to create a false narrative of criminal activity. This included escalating minor disputes into serious criminal allegations to justify excessive police action. -
Illegal Arrests and Detentions
Numerous arrests were carried out without proper warrants, relying on false information or incomplete dockets. Detentions were prolonged unnecessarily, violating basic rights.
Supporting Documentation and Evidence
-
Detailed Chronology Links
The timelines referenced above are supported by extensive documentation, including witness statements, court records, and video evidence. -
Highlighted Incidents
Key moments from the timelines include:-
July 2022: Illegal evictions with SAPS complicity.
-
August 2022: Arrest executed without a valid warrant, accompanied by a campaign of intimidation and misinformation.
-
December 2022: Highly coordinated and illegal raids under the guise of lawful arrest operations, targeting private residences.
-
Access Full Chronologies
To explore the complete timelines and view supporting evidence, click the links below:
These timelines underscore the systematic and premeditated abuse of power by those entrusted with upholding the law.
"Justice without force is powerless; force without justice is tyrannical."
Blaise Pascal