CHAPTER SUMMARIES PART THREE :
WEAPONISATION OF SAPS & THE MEDIA BY MEDIA24

Chapter Summaries Index – Overview of Key Campaign Pages

This summary outlines the key chapters featured throughout the website—each entry linking to a full page documenting a specific aspect of the criminal campaign.

CHAPTER SUMMARIES, CHAPTER MENU AND SUBJECT INDEX

CORRUPTION, COLLUSION & COMPLICITY

This chapter provides a comprehensive, evidence-based analysis of how specific officers within the South African Police Service (SAPS) were used as a tool for private individuals to achieve their financial and legal objectives. It meticulously details the illegal arrests, judicial interference, abuse of power, perjury, fabricated charges, and state-sanctioned harassment orchestrated through SAPS officers in collaboration with private investigator Wouter de Swardt and his clients.

Through an extensive review of arrest records, affidavits, judicial proceedings, WhatsApp exports, legal documents, and firsthand witness testimony, this chapter establishes the existence of a sustained and systematic abuse of state resources to execute private agendas.

The evidence does not merely suggest misconduct—it conclusively proves deliberate corruption, with SAPS officers acting as enforcers for private individuals, engaging in acts that had no legal basis, violated fundamental rights, and subverted due process to facilitate personal financial gains.

This chapter dissects the evidence, detailing the criminal conduct of SAPS officers, their collusion with private individuals, and their role in an orchestrated campaign designed to remove legal occupants from properties, fabricate charges, obstruct justice, and enable financial theft on an unprecedented scale.

Introduction: The Criminal Alliance Between SAPS Officers and Private Individuals

This investigation does not implicate SAPS (South African Police Service) as an entire institution, nor does it seek to undermine the many dedicated officers who uphold the rule of law. However, specific individuals within SAPS (South African Police Service) Hout Bay and Bellville Commercial Crimes have actively participated in a campaign of corruption that cannot be dismissed as mere negligence or incompetence.

Their actions go far beyond simple misconduct. They engaged in:

Illegal Arrests Without Warrants – Arrests were executed without judicial approval, often with no legitimate basis, purely to serve private financial interests.
Judicial Interference and Perjury – SAPS (South African Police Service) officers knowingly provided false testimony under oath, manipulated evidence, and fabricated legal grounds for arrests.
Collusion With Private Investigator Wouter de Swardt – A private individual with no official standing in law enforcement was given access to SAPS resources, participated in arrests, and directed police actions.
Illegal Evictions Under the Guise of Arrests – SAPS (South African Police Service) officers actively assisted in forcibly removing legal occupants from properties, despite clear legal protections preventing such actions without court orders.
Fabrication of Charges and Falsification of Evidence – Charges were manufactured to justify unlawful detentions, including inflating the value of alleged stolen goods by over 2,000% to classify minor cases as major offences.
Harassment and Targeted Persecution – The repeated surveillance, intimidation, and illegal detentions were designed to wear down the legal resistance of the target and allow private individuals to seize assets.
The pattern of conduct seen across multiple cases confirms a coordinated effort to use SAPS as a weapon for private gain.

The Illegal Arrests: How SAPS (South African Police Service) Became an Instrument for Private Interests

One of the most shocking aspects of this case is how SAPS (South African Police Service) officers repeatedly executed unlawful arrests to benefit private landlords and their hired agents. These arrests were not initiated through legitimate police investigations or evidence but rather on the direct instruction of private individuals.

The First Arrest: Illegal, Warrantless, and Coordinated for Financial Gain

The Arrest Was Ordered by Private Individuals – No official police investigation had been conducted prior to the arrest. The charges were lodged and immediately acted upon, without any due diligence or evidence gathering.
SAPS (South African Police Service) Officers Knew the Charges Were False – The officers were fully aware that no crime had been committed, yet they proceeded with the arrest based on the false claims of the complainants.
Obstruction of Legal Rights – Access to an attorney was deliberately obstructed, preventing the accused from seeking immediate legal recourse.
Prolonged, Unjustified Detention – The accused was held far beyond the legal timeframe for processing to ensure the landlords could achieve their objectives before the courts could intervene.
Manipulation of Bail Conditions – SAPS (South African Police Service) inflated the value of alleged stolen goods by 2,000%, misrepresenting the case as a high-level financial crime to rig the bail process and ensure a lengthy pre-trial detention.
Judicial Corruption and Perjury – SAPS (South African Police Service) officers testified under oath using fabricated evidence, knowingly presenting falsehoods to the court to justify extended incarceration.

The Role of Private Investigator Wouter de Swardt: A Civillian Dictating Police Actions

The direct involvement of private investigator Wouter de Swardt in police operations proves the existence of corruption within SAPS (South African Police Service).

He was present at every major arrest, despite having no legal standing to do so.
SAPS (South African Police Service) officers took direct instructions from him, treating him as a superior authority over their own command structure.
He participated in searches and arrests, violating basic legal principles that prohibit private individuals from taking part in law enforcement operations.
His involvement extended to judicial proceedings, where he actively influenced how SAPS officers handled cases, ensuring that certain evidence was buried while other fabricated narratives were advanced.

The Second Arrest: A Blueprint for Weaponizing the State

The second arrest followed an identical pattern, further proving that SAPS was not acting independently but rather following a private agenda.

The timing of the arrest was deliberately aligned with the landlords’ legal objectives, ensuring that it coincided with key property disputes and court cases.
SAPS (South African Police Service) once again failed to obtain an arrest warrant, meaning that the entire arrest was unlawful from the outset.
Private individuals were once again present at the arrest, including de Swardt, confirming that this was not a police-initiated operation.
Fabricated charges were used once more, this time relying on manipulated financial records to create the illusion of fraud.
Judicial interference escalated, with SAPS officers failing to present exculpatory evidence in court, deliberately misleading the magistrate to ensure prolonged detention.
The Financial and Legal Objectives Behind the Corruption
The arrests were used to clear legal occupants from properties, allowing landlords to regain control illegally.
SAPS (South African Police Service) officers and private individuals ensured that evidence proving the lease agreements and payments were hidden, allowing the false claim of "illegal occupation" to be sustained.
The goal was to force the accused into legal and financial ruin, enabling the complainants to seize assets without legal challenge.
The arrests were timed precisely to disrupt court applications that would have prevented illegal evictions.
SAPS (South African Police Service) officers ensured that certain legal applications were ignored while prioritizing complaints that served private financial interests.

The Wider Implications: A Case Study in Systemic Corruption

The events outlined in this chapter go beyond a single case of police misconduct. They expose a broader, systemic problem within SAPS (South African Police Service), where specific officers work in collaboration with private individuals to subvert justice, exploit legal loopholes, and facilitate financial crimes.

This is not an isolated case—this is a blueprint for corruption, showing how state power can be hijacked for private benefit.
It proves that SAPS (South African Police Service) officers are willing to manufacture criminal cases, manipulate court proceedings, and obstruct justice when it serves their private interests.
The evidence shows a clear pattern of abuse, confirming that certain individuals within SAPS are knowingly engaging in illegal activity at the behest of private parties.

Conclusion: The State Was Used as a Private Enforcement Mechanism

This chapter presents overwhelming proof that SAPS (South African Police Service) officers within Hout Bay and Bellville Commercial Crimes were not acting as law enforcement officials but rather as hired enforcers for private individuals.

They knowingly carried out false arrests, fabricated charges, and interfered with judicial processes to achieve private financial objectives.
They allowed a private investigator with no official standing to dictate police actions, violate due process, and engage in unlawful activities.
They manipulated court processes, obstructed exculpatory evidence, and ensured that certain individuals were arrested while others were protected.
Their actions resulted in direct financial and personal losses, proving that this was not about law enforcement but rather about asset theft and economic sabotage.

This was not law enforcement. This was state-sponsored corruption, collusion, and complicity, designed to serve private interests at the expense of justice.

CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY: DELIBERATE WEAPONIZATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR PRIVATE GAIN

This chapter provides an extensive, evidence-driven account of how law enforcement officers within SAPS (South African Police Service) were systematically manipulated, co-opted, and directed by private individuals to serve their financial and legal objectives. It outlines, in painstaking detail, the coordinated criminal collusion between SAPS (South African Police Service) officials, private investigators, and financially motivated individuals, whose combined actions led to unlawful arrests, falsified charges, judicial interference, manipulation of evidence, and repeated perjury in legal proceedings.

Through an exhaustive examination of police records, court transcripts, sworn affidavits, WhatsApp exports, financial documents, and firsthand testimony, this chapter establishes beyond all doubt that this was not a case of mere negligence or procedural failure—it was a calculated and orchestrated conspiracy to exploit the justice system as a private enforcement mechanism for financial gain.

The Illicit Partnership: How SAPS (South African Police Service) Officers Became a Tool for Private Financial Interests

Rather than serving the law, specific officers within SAPS (South African Police Service) Hout Bay and Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit actively facilitated illegal operations on behalf of private individuals. Their direct involvement in unlawful arrests, fabricated dockets, and procedural corruption not only violated legal protections but fundamentally subverted the integrity of the justice system.

Key aspects of their corrupt and criminal conduct included:

Illegal warrantless arrests—Carried out on the direct instruction of private complainants, often in clear violation of legal procedure.
Fabrication of charges and dockets—Minor disputes were deliberately inflated into serious criminal cases with no basis in fact.
Judicial interference—Court proceedings were actively manipulated to delay, obstruct, or engineer favorable legal outcomes for the complainants.
Collusion with private investigator Wouter de Swardt—A civilian was granted unlawful access to SAPS resources, effectively directing investigations and arrests for private gain.
State resources misused for private objectives—Police officers were dispatched to locate, detain, and persecute individuals based on private complaints, often resembling tactics used in political repression rather than criminal investigation.
Obstruction of justice—Police officials actively suppressed exculpatory evidence while knowingly advancing fabricated charges.
Perjury and fraudulent affidavits—SAPS (South African Police Service) officers repeatedly made false statements under oath to sustain wrongful detentions and obstruct legitimate legal challenges.

Case Study: The First Illegal Arrest (March 2022)

One of the most damning examples of SAPS (South African Police Service) being used as an enforcement mechanism for private vendettas occurred in March 2022. The arrest was not a result of a legitimate criminal investigation but rather a premeditated strategy orchestrated by private individuals seeking to incapacitate and silence their legal opponent.

No active police investigation had been conducted prior to the arrest—police acted purely on private instruction.
Fabricated charges were leveled with no supporting evidence, ignoring financial records and contractual agreements that
disproved the claims.
The arrest was timed to coincide with a key property dispute, enabling the complainants to seize control of valuable assets while their target was detained.
Denial of legal rights—The arrested individual was deliberately denied access to an attorney, ensuring he could not contest the unlawful detention.
No formal investigation followed—Confirming that the arrest was never about law enforcement but rather about executing a pre-planned legal attack.

This arrest set a dangerous precedent, establishing that SAPS (South African Police Service) officers were willing participants in using police powers for private gain.

The Role of Wouter de Swardt: A Civilian Running Law Enforcement Operations

Private investigator Wouter de Swardt played a central role in coordinating these fraudulent legal maneuvers, directing SAPS officers as if they were his personal security force. His involvement exposes the depth of law enforcement corruption at play.

Physically present at illegal arrests—Despite having no legal authority, he attended and directed police operations.
Dictated police actions—SAPS (South African Police Service) officers followed his instructions over legal protocols.
Manipulated evidence—Ensured that exculpatory documents were omitted from case files, securing wrongful detentions.
Engaged in judicial interference—Regularly inserted himself into court proceedings to control legal narratives.
Functioned as an extrajudicial law enforcement agent—Illegally using police resources to achieve financial goals for his clients.

Case Study: The Second Illegal Arrest (May 2022)

Another unlawful arrest was executed in May 2022, reinforcing the pattern of SAPS (South African Police Service) officers acting on private orders rather than legal merit.

No formal police investigation was conducted prior to the arrest.
Once again, a private financial dispute was at the core, demonstrating the corrupt collusion between police and complainants.
The arrest was used to justify an illegal property seizure, overriding lease agreements and legal protections.
Fabricated financial charges were submitted with no supporting evidence.
Key exculpatory evidence was actively concealed to sustain the fraudulent case.
The arrest resulted in a prolonged detention, preventing the accused from attending critical legal proceedings that would have exposed the fraud.
The case was later dismissed due to lack of evidence, proving that the arrest was never about criminal justice but about eliminating legal resistance.

The Judicial Interference and Perjury by SAPS Officers

Beyond the arrests, SAPS (South African Police Service) officers engaged in further legal subterfuge, committing acts that were not just unethical but criminal in themselves.

Knowingly presented false testimony under oath to sustain fraudulent detentions.
Inflated financial figures to transform minor disputes into major financial crimes.
Obstructed bail proceedings to extend unlawful incarcerations.
Manipulated case dockets to ensure fabricated charges proceeded through the court system.
Coordinated directly with private complainants, sharing privileged police information to aid their financial disputes.

Conclusion: SAPS (South African Police Service) as an Instrument for Criminal Collusion

This chapter proves beyond doubt that SAPS (South African Police Service) officers within Hout Bay and Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit were not acting as law enforcement officials but as facilitators of private financial crime.

They engaged in illegal arrests, fabricated charges, and judicial interference.
They enabled a private investigator to function as an extrajudicial law enforcement agent.
They knowingly obstructed justice, manipulated evidence, and committed perjury to achieve predetermined outcomes.
They allowed police functions to be controlled by private individuals for personal financial gain.

This was not law enforcement. This was corruption, collusion, and complicity at the highest levels, proving that SAPS was being used as a private enforcement mechanism for financial crime.

Corruption and Criminality: The Deliberate Weaponization of Law Enforcement for Private Gain

This chapter provides an extensive, evidence-driven account of how law enforcement officers within SAPS were systematically manipulated, co-opted, and directed by private individuals to serve their financial and legal objectives. It outlines, in painstaking detail, the coordinated criminal collusion between SAPS (South African Police Service) officials, private investigators, and financially motivated individuals, whose combined actions led to unlawful arrests, falsified charges, judicial interference, manipulation of evidence, and repeated perjury in legal proceedings.

The Illicit Partnership: How SAPS (South African Police Service) Officers Became a Tool for Private Financial Interests

Key aspects of their corrupt and criminal conduct included:

Illegal warrantless arrests—Carried out on the direct instruction of private complainants, often in clear violation of legal procedure.
Fabrication of charges and dockets—Minor disputes were deliberately inflated into serious criminal cases with no basis in fact.
Judicial interference—Court proceedings were actively manipulated to delay, obstruct, or engineer favorable legal outcomes for the complainants.
Collusion with private investigator Wouter de Swardt—A civilian was granted unlawful access to SAPS resources, effectively directing investigations and arrests for private gain.
State resources misused for private objectives—Police officers were dispatched to locate, detain, and persecute individuals based on private complaints, often resembling tactics used in political repression rather than criminal investigation.
Obstruction of justice—Police officials actively suppressed exculpatory evidence while knowingly advancing fabricated charges.
Perjury and fraudulent affidavits—SAPS (South African Police Service) officers repeatedly made false statements under oath to sustain wrongful detentions and obstruct legitimate legal challenges.

Crimes and Actions Committed as Documented in the Evidence

The following is a comprehensive list of specific crimes and actions committed as detailed in the evidence, categorized by their nature:

Illegal Arrests & Unlawful Detentions

Arrest without a warrant—Executed without legal grounds, often at the direct request of private individuals.
Failure to investigate before arrest—Arrests were made without any preliminary police investigation or evidence collection.
Rigged bail application & malicious prosecution—Judicial manipulation to extend detention without justification.
Obstruction of access to legal representation—Denying the accused the right to contact legal counsel.
Unjustified prolonged detentions—Detaining individuals without cause to facilitate private financial gain.
Illegal confiscation of personal property at arrest—Attempting to seize devices and financial records without a warrant.
Denial of due process—Individuals were detained without being informed of the charges against them.

Fabrication of Charges & Judicial Interference

False criminal allegations—Inventing accusations to justify wrongful arrests.
Inflation of financial claims by over 2000%—To elevate minor disputes into serious fraud cases.
Submission of false affidavits in court—Officers knowingly providing perjured testimony.
Manipulation of bail conditions—Using fabricated charges to complicate bail proceedings.
Falsified case dockets—Removing exculpatory evidence to sustain wrongful detentions.
Judicial misrepresentation—Providing misleading financial figures and evidence to courts.
Refusal to close fraudulent case dockets—Keeping false cases open to use them in future legal battles.
Failure to comply with court orders—Ignoring magistrates' instructions to investigate exculpatory evidence.

Collusion with Private Investigator Wouter de Swardt

Illegal involvement of a private investigator in law enforcement—Allowing a civilian to direct SAPS operations.
Participation of private individuals in arrests—Letting complainants attend and dictate police actions.
Tampering with evidence—Omitting key financial and legal documents from case files.
Orchestration of media narratives—Collaborating with journalists to smear the accused in the press.
Choreographed arrests for media coverage—Planning police raids to coincide with negative news coverage.
Unlawful access to privileged SAPS information—Providing police case updates directly to private individuals.

Obstruction of Justice & Witness Intimidation

Failure to take witness statements from victims of assault—Refusing to document evidence contradicting the false charges.
Direct intimidation of witnesses—Threats against those who refused to comply with fabricated testimonies.
Bribery and coercion of witnesses—Offering payments to secure false testimony.
Surveillance and stalking of targets—Repeated police visits and drive-bys to intimidate the accused.
Illegal use of SAPS (South African Police Service) resources for private surveillance—Tracking the accused without legal grounds.
Suppression of complaints against private individuals—Police refusing to investigate legitimate complaints.
Manipulation of immigration records—Falsely claiming the accused was unlawfully present in the country.
Illegal retention of passports and personal documentation—Confiscating identity documents without justification.
Interference with the judiciary—Attempting to block court applications that could expose police misconduct.

Financial & Property-Related Crimes

Facilitation of illegal evictions—Using SAPS officers to forcibly remove legal occupants from properties.
Theft of assets under the guise of arrests—Seizing property and transferring control to private complainants.
Sabotaging business operations—Deliberate attempts to collapse the financial viability of the accused’s enterprise.
Intentional withholding of exonerating financial records—Refusing to acknowledge bank records that disproved fraud allegations.
Creation of fraudulent civil disputes—Fabricating property and rental disputes to justify legal action.
Collusion with real estate investors—Arrests timed to facilitate property seizures by complainants.
Misuse of financial records to justify legal actions—Deliberate misrepresentation of business transactions.
Bribing officials to delay court proceedings—Ensuring legal delays benefitted private financial interests.
Manipulation of business licensing processes—Obstructing renewal of permits to cripple financial sustainability.

Conclusion: A Case Study in Institutionalized Corruption

The extensive and deliberate criminal conduct outlined in this chapter proves beyond doubt that SAPS (South African Police Service) officers within Hout Bay and Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit did not act as impartial law enforcers but instead served as a private enforcement mechanism for financial crime.

They knowingly carried out false arrests, fabricated charges, and interfered with judicial processes to achieve private financial objectives.
They enabled a private investigator to function as an extrajudicial law enforcement agent.
They manipulated court processes, obstructed exculpatory evidence, and ensured that certain individuals were arrested while others were protected.
Their actions resulted in direct financial and personal losses, proving that this was not about law enforcement but rather about asset theft and economic sabotage.

This was not law enforcement. This was state-sponsored corruption, collusion, and complicity, designed to serve private interests at the expense of justice.

CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY: A CHRONOLOGY OF ORCHESTRATED INJUSTICE

This chapter meticulously lays out the systematic abuse of power, manipulation of law enforcement, and corruption at every level that defined the campaign against me. It is not a vague accusation of wrongdoing—it is a detailed, evidenced-based breakdown of how SAPS (South African Police Service) officials, private individuals, and judicial actors colluded to subvert justice for financial and personal gain.

The Orchestration Of My Arrests: Deliberate Manipulation Of The Justice System

The events documented here prove beyond any reasonable doubt that each arrest, detention, and legal manoeuvre was not the result of legitimate law enforcement action but rather a carefully premeditated and unlawful operation designed to incapacitate me while private individuals benefitted financially.

First Arrest (4 August 2022) – False Charges, Fabricated Evidence, and an Orchestrated Bail Objection:

No warrant of arrest was obtained, nor was an investigation conducted.

The alleged theft charge was based purely on an uncorroborated statement from Inge Broad, claiming three old televisions and a microwave were missing, despite police having prior records proving these items had been stolen by guests—and already replaced.

When I was detained at Hout Bay SAPS (South African Police Service), the Investigating Officer obstructed my ability to contact my attorney while orchestrating a plan to ensure I was denied bail on false pretences.

At the bail hearing, SAPS (South African Police Service) suddenly inflated the alleged stolen goods’ value by 2000%—from a few thousand Rand to R835,000—without justification, to move the charge into a Schedule 5 offence, making bail significantly harder to obtain.

The case against me was entirely reliant on perjured testimony, knowingly supported by corrupt SAPS officers.

Second Arrest (December 2022) – Further Fraudulent Charges and a Coordinated Effort to Keep Me Detained:

Once it became evident that the first charges could not be sustained, SAPS officers, at the instruction of Wouter de Swardt, laid three fraudulent "fraud" charges against me, based on fabricated statements from manipulated witnesses.

Again, a concerted effort was made to oppose bail at all costs, using tactics that included falsely claiming I was a flight risk and intentionally suppressing evidence proving I was not.

A new Home Affairs affidavit was falsified by Wouter de Swardt and SAPS officials, stating that I had not renewed my visa since March 2021—when, in reality, SAPS (South African Police Service) had been illegally withholding my passport for months, making renewal impossible.

The goal of this arrest was not prosecution but indefinite detention, ensuring that I could not contest the illegal seizure of properties and assets.

The Corrupt Nexus: Law Enforcement, Private Interests, And Judicial Interference

This chapter lays out how a well-connected network of private individuals systematically weaponized SAPS, private investigators, and even Home Affairs to serve their own objectives:

Hout Bay SAPS (South African Police Service), Belville Commercial Crime, and Investigating Officers Stevens & Duna actively facilitated illegal actions and knowingly pursued false charges.
Private investigators, including Wouter de Swardt, Johan Schalkwyk, and Denis Dalton, manipulated witnesses, fabricated evidence, and coordinated unlawful arrests.
Landlords Keith and Inge Broad directly benefited from my imprisonment, using it to facilitate unlawful property seizures and financial gain.
News24 and Media24 colluded to control the narrative, ensuring a flood of prejudicial and misleading media coverage, which would make any legal defense infinitely harder.
Home Affairs officers knowingly falsified records to assist SAPS in creating an immigration-related charge when all other efforts to keep me detained failed.

The evidence presented here is not circumstantial—it includes official police reports, affidavits, dockets, court transcripts, and direct communications that expose the coordinated nature of these actions.

The Campaign Of Systematic Sabotage And Financial Motive

This chapter further exposes how every unlawful action was timed with precision to benefit the landlords, property interests, and SAPS (South African Police Service) officers involved:

Rent and Rental Income Before & After My Involvement – Financial records prove that the landlords' properties were transformed into highly profitable assets due to my efforts—making my removal all the more lucrative for them.
Illegal Evictions & Seizures – The unlawful tactics used to take possession of properties without a valid court order.
Interference in Judicial Processes – The manipulation of the court system to obstruct legitimate claims, fast-track baseless ones, and deny fair hearings.
A Timeline of Corruption – A detailed breakdown of over seventy separate incidents where the justice system was abused to serve private interests.

Legal Implications And The Clear Evidence Of Conspiracy

Under South African law, particularly the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA) and the Criminal Procedure Act, every individual involved in this coordinated effort is equally culpable under conspiracy to commit a crime, perjury, and obstruction of justice.

The unlawful arrests and prolonged detentions constitute a clear case of malicious prosecution.
The falsification of documents and perjured testimony violate multiple provisions under South African law.
The illegal eviction and asset seizures violate tenancy and property laws.
The media collusion, with its demonstrably false coverage, constitutes criminal defamation.

This chapter lays out the full chronology of corruption, with direct reference to documented events, evidence, and legal violations, ensuring an irrefutable record of systemic misconduct.

UNLAWFUL CONDUCT OF SERGEANT STEVENS & BELVILLE COMMERCIAL CRIMES UNIT

The misconduct, corruption, and criminality committed by Sergeant Stevens and his associates at Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit form one of the most staggering examples of abuse of power in the case. This chapter presents an in-depth and fully documented account of their illegal actions, violations of due process, and collusion with private interests—all of which were instrumental in my unlawful arrest, prolonged detention, and the calculated destruction of my legal and financial standing.

This is possibly the longest and most detailed chapter of the entire case due to the sheer scale of misconduct. The evidence provided is irrefutable, consisting of court records, sworn affidavits, internal police documents, communications, and procedural violations that reveal a law enforcement unit weaponized by private individuals to achieve illegal objectives.

A Systematic Campaign Of Abuse

Unlike isolated incidents of police misconduct, the corrupt acts committed by Stevens and his network were premeditated and coordinated. At the heart of this operation was the collusion between SAPS (South African Police Service) officers and private actors, including landlords, investigators, and media operatives, all of whom benefited directly from my unlawful persecution.

The key areas of misconduct included:

The Theft And Sabotage Of My Immigration Status

SAPS (South African Police Service) intentionally stole my passport, ensuring I could not renew my visa and later using this fabricated “illegal” status to justify an arrest and prolonged detention.

Misleading statements to Home Affairs and the courts were made to falsely claim I had never extended my visa, when in fact, documented proof shows I had.

The Fabrication Of Criminal Charges And Docket Manipulation

The entire docket used to justify my December arrest contained zero legitimate investigative work.

No attempt was made to gather evidence or question witnesses before arrest.

Key affidavits were manufactured months later, with police officers and private parties creating statements to justify actions retroactively.

The Illegal Seizure Of Property And Financial Gain Of The Landlords

SAPS officers were directly involved in facilitating the illegal eviction of my properties, effectively handing control to the landlords.

Seizure warrants were unlawfully granted and executed, leading to the confiscation of all critical devices and documents—many of which were then withheld indefinitely, preventing my defense.

The Militarized Raid And Extreme Misuse Of State Resources

A full SWAT-style Special Task Force (STF) raid was conducted on my residence—an absurd use of force for a non-violent, business-related case.

Two dozen officers, automatic weapons, and tactical teams were deployed without justification, exposing the real purpose of the arrest as a staged event for media spectacle.

Direct Collusion Between SAPS (South African Police Service) And Private Investigators

SAPS (South African Police Service) officers worked in partnership with private investigators hired by my adversaries, including Wouter de Swardt, Denis Dalton, and Johan Schalkwyk.

These individuals had no official standing but were treated as if they had police authority, directing officers and participating in my arrest.

The Pattern Of Corruption: Every Step Of The Process Was Manipulated

Every procedural stage in my case was manipulated to serve a singular goal: to justify my imprisonment, remove me from my properties, and ensure my absence would allow for financial gain by others. The tactics used are clear:

False arrest & detention without a valid warrant – SAPS (South African Police Service) acted without legal authority, making the arrest purely to serve private interests.
Obstruction of justice – Exculpatory evidence was deliberately withheld, preventing any chance of due process.
Judicial manipulation – Magistrates were misled with false affidavits and procedural violations, ensuring the charges remained despite their illegitimacy.
Sustained abuse of bail conditions – SAPS (South African Police Service) continued using fabricated evidence to extend my detention long after the charges should have been dropped.

Unjustifiable Use Of Force And Corrupt Seizure Of Evidence

The most visually striking aspect of my arrest was the absurd level of force used by law enforcement. This was not a high-risk criminal apprehension—it was a military-style operation, seemingly designed to humiliate me, inflict maximum damage, and serve as a public spectacle.

The Special Task Force (STF) was mobilized, storming my residence in a manner resembling a counterterrorism operation. Their presence had no legitimate legal justification—instead, it provided cover for:

A frantic search for alleged "hidden assets" – SAPS (South African Police Service) officers and private investigators were looking for a safe allegedly containing diamonds and cash, which was purely a fabricated narrative spread by my adversaries.
The staged nature of the arrest for media consumption – The large-scale operation gave legitimacy to false claims and allowed the press to report an “international criminal takedown” without scrutiny.
Immediate transfer of property control – My removal was orchestrated to allow landlords and co-conspirators to immediately seize and profit from the properties I had legally occupied.

The Role Of Home Affairs And Immigration Manipulation

A key part of SAPS (South African Police Service)’ strategy was deliberate interference with my immigration status. The objective was simple: create an artificial basis for an arrest, justify extended detention, and weaken my legal position. This was achieved through:

The theft of my passport, making it impossible to legally extend my visa.

SAPS (South African Police Service) providing false information to Home Affairs, claiming I was illegally in the country since March 2021—despite clear evidence proving my visa was legally extended.

Falsified affidavits from Home Affairs officials, which were demonstrably false and later proven to have been obtained under suspicious circumstances.

This tactic alone enabled the prosecution to object to bail, ensuring my continued imprisonment while those who orchestrated my arrest profited from my absence.

The Clear Legal Violations And Criminal Accountability

The actions of Sergeant Stevens, SAPS (South African Police Service), and their private accomplices constitute a clear criminal conspiracy under South African law. These include:

Unlawful arrests and detentions – Violations of constitutional rights.
Fabrication of evidence and perjury – False affidavits submitted to the courts.
Theft of legal documents and obstruction of justice – Denial of access to critical case materials.
Abuse of public office for private financial gain – Police resources were used solely to benefit private landlords and investigators.
Collusion between law enforcement and private individuals – Evidence proving direct relationships and conflicts of interest.

The Impact Of These Crimes

The human cost of these illegal actions cannot be understated. Beyond the financial theft, seizure of property, and fabricated criminal case, the physical and psychological impact of being subjected to this level of state-backed persecution has been profound.

Months of unlawful imprisonment in Pollsmoor Prison, a notoriously violent facility.

Complete destruction of my business operations—all while those behind my arrest financially benefited.

Incalculable damage to my reputation, made worse by coordinated media campaigns.

Ongoing persecution and threats, even after the legal case fell apart.

Conclusion: The Largest Case Of Corrupt Collusion In South African Law Enforcement

This chapter provides an exhaustive, evidence-driven account of how SAPS (South African Police Service) officials, private investigators, landlords, and corrupt media operatives worked together to engineer my downfall. Their actions were not isolated incidents of misconduct—they were calculated crimes, designed to permanently remove me from my properties, erase my financial stake, and imprison me indefinitely.

The sheer number of procedural violations, fabricated documents, and illegal actions make this one of the most egregious cases of law enforcement corruption in recent South African history.

This page serves as an unfiltered exposé of these crimes, providing undeniable proof of a coordinated criminal conspiracy that must be investigated at the highest levels.

THE CRIMES OF BELLVILLE COMMERCIAL CRIMES UNIT:

The Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit played a central and irreplaceable role in the systematic corruption that led to my unlawful arrests, detentions, financial ruin, and persecution. Far from being a neutral law enforcement agency, they were active participants in a criminal conspiracy, using the full force of the state to enforce the private objectives of a group of landlords, private investigators, and financial beneficiaries.

This chapter exposes in full detail the staggering list of criminal offenses, procedural abuses, and human rights violations committed by Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit (BCCU). It presents irrefutable evidence that SAPS (South African Police Service) officers within this unit:

Fabricated criminal charges and knowingly pursued baseless prosecutions.
Threatened, coerced, and manipulated witnesses into making false statements.
Falsified affidavits and police reports to justify unlawful arrests.
Colluded with private individuals in orchestrating a financial and legal attack.
Used extreme, unjustified force, including a SWAT-style raid.
Seized and retained critical personal property illegally, denying access to exculpatory evidence.
Suppressed evidence that proved my innocence.
Engaged in systematic intimidation against anyone who challenged their actions.

A Case Built On Lies, Coercion, And State-Backed Threats

The Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit was not investigating a crime—they were engineering one. This chapter lays out, in forensic detail, how officers within BCCU, particularly Sergeant Stevens and his superiors, engaged in a long-term, coordinated plan to target me on behalf of private financial interests.

The False Charges And Fabricated Evidence

Every charge laid against me by BCCU was manufactured from the ground up. There was no legitimate evidence, no complainants with actual losses, and no victims—only pre-written accusations crafted to serve a specific financial and legal purpose.

The so-called “fraud” charges were built on pre-scripted witness statements, dictated to individuals under threat of prosecution.
Critical financial documents and contracts proving the legitimacy of my business model were ignored, omitted, or actively destroyed.
Even after multiple magistrates dismissed certain charges as baseless, BCCU officers persisted in pursuing them.
The fact that the case against me collapsed completely once exposed to external scrutiny speaks volumes about the depth of corruption at Bellville Commercial Crimes.

Witness Coercion: The Use Of Intimidation To Manufacture A Case

One of the most damning aspects of this case is the systematic campaign of witness intimidation, where SAPS officers actively worked with private individuals to fabricate evidence.

Former employees, business partners, and even casual acquaintances were contacted and pressured to testify against me.
In multiple cases, individuals were told they faced 10-30 years in prison unless they agreed to sign pre-written statements.
Several witnesses, including Chandre Abrahams, explicitly refused to lie despite enormous pressure.
Individuals who initially signed statements under duress later recanted, exposing the methods used to secure false testimony.

Evidence from WhatsApp messages, recorded calls, and legal correspondence confirms that SAPS officers knowingly participated in this process, demonstrating that they were not merely negligent but active participants in a criminal conspiracy.

The Militarized Raid: A Spectacle Of Force Without Justification

Perhaps the most visually shocking aspect of the case was the completely unjustified deployment of a Special Task Force (STF) unit, treating a business-related civil dispute as though it were an armed hostage situation.

Over 20 heavily armed officers stormed my residence, wielding military-grade equipment and automatic weapons.
The operation was personally overseen by Wouter de Swardt and other private individuals, who had no official law enforcement role.
This extreme show of force was immediately followed by media coverage portraying my arrest as a high-profile criminal takedown, ensuring I was unable to mount an effective legal defense.

This was not a police operation—it was a carefully staged event, designed for maximum psychological and reputational damage.

The Illegal Seizure Of My Property And Data Suppression

Following my arrest, SAPS officers, acting under orders from Bellville Commercial Crimes, executed a completely unlawful seizure of my personal property. Their true intent was clear:

✔ My passport was stolen and never returned, ensuring I could not legally renew my visa.
✔ My electronic devices were taken and have been illegally retained, even after legal demands for their return.
✔ Despite supposedly "investigating fraud," SAPS never examined my business accounts, never audited the books, and never interviewed the key financial figures.
✔ The focus was entirely on withholding critical evidence from me, preventing me from proving my innocence.

The seizure of personal data, devices, and legal documents was not an investigatory tool—it was an act of sabotage.

The Role Of Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit In Suppressing Justice

Even after the complete exposure of the fraudulent charges, BCCU officers persisted in blocking legal remedies. Their actions demonstrate a level of corruption far beyond individual officers—it was systemic.

Attempts to secure bail were actively opposed, using knowingly false information.
Court orders demanding the return of seized items were ignored or delayed indefinitely.
Despite multiple judicial rulings in my favour, BCCU officers continued to push baseless claims.

This was not law enforcement—this was a criminal enterprise, operating under the colour of authority.

Legal Ramifications: The Crimes Of Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit

The actions of SAPS (South African Police Service) officers within Bellville Commercial Crimes constitute direct violations of multiple South African laws, including:

Fabrication of Evidence (Criminal Procedure Act, Section 319) – Knowingly submitting false affidavits and coercing witnesses is a serious criminal offense.
Obstruction of Justice (Prevention of Organized Crime Act, Section 4) – The systematic suppression of exculpatory evidence is a clear act of judicial interference.
Unlawful Detention (Constitution of South Africa, Section 35) – Detaining an individual under false pretences and opposing bail without cause violates fundamental human rights protections.
Theft and Unlawful Retention of Property (Criminal Law Amendment Act, 105 of 1997) – The theft and continued illegal possession of my passport, electronic devices, and financial records is a direct act of criminal misconduct.

This chapter presents these violations in exhaustive detail, providing a fully substantiated legal framework for criminal and civil action against those responsible.

Conclusion: Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit Must Be Held Accountable

This chapter lays out, beyond any reasonable doubt, that Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit was never acting in pursuit of justice—they were acting as enforcers for private financial interests.

Every procedural safeguard was ignored, every legal protection was violated, and every institutional mechanism was weaponized against me.
This was not a law enforcement failure—it was an organized crime operation, conducted under the authority of the state.
The crimes committed by BCCU officers cannot be explained away as incompetence or negligence—this was wilful, deliberate, and systemic corruption.

This chapter serves as an indisputable legal indictment of Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit, ensuring that their misconduct is permanently documented, exposed, and challenged at every legal level.

SERGEANT STEVENS CHRONOLOGY OF CORRUPTION & CRIMINALITY

This chapter presents a meticulously documented chronological timeline, exposing the calculated, coordinated, and unlawful campaign waged through corrupt SAPS (South African Police Service) officers, private individuals, and judicial manipulation. The events outlined in the following timeline reveal a pattern of misconduct—not isolated incidents, but a systematic abuse of power aimed at achieving financial and legal objectives for a select group of individuals.

This chronology of corruption is not a mere record of events—it is evidence of a highly organized and deliberate operation. The timeline exposes how unlawful evictions, fabricated criminal charges, judicial interference, and the weaponization of SAPS were not accidental but part of a structured conspiracy aimed at seizing control of properties, silencing legal opposition, and obstructing justice.

A Timeline Of Abuse: The Key Themes Revealed

The timeline from 2021 to 2022 establishes the following clear and consistent patterns:

Unlawful Evictions Disguised as Police Actions – Multiple documented instances of SAPS officers being deployed at the instruction of private individuals to conduct illegal evictions, despite legal protections in place.
Fabricated Criminal Charges and False Arrests – Systematic attempts to create legal obstacles through manufactured police cases, perjury, and the strategic use of arrests to manipulate civil proceedings.
Judicial Interference and Corrupt Investigations – Clear evidence of SAPS officers acting on direct instructions from private individuals, manipulating case dockets, and obstructing exculpatory evidence.
Collusion Between Private Investigators and SAPS (South African Police Service) – The direct involvement of Wouter de Swardt, a private investigator, in orchestrating unlawful police actions, including illegal searches, surveillance, and evidence tampering.
Coordinated SAPS (South African Police Service) Corruption Across Multiple Divisions – The repeated and documented failure of SAPS (South African Police Service) Hout Bay and Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit to act independently, instead prioritizing private interests over legal obligations.

Each section of this timeline presents undeniable proof that SAPS officers were acting not as law enforcement officials but as enforcers for private financial interests.

The Evidence: A Detailed Record Of Unlawful Actions

This chapter will outline, in chronological order, the illegal actions and criminal conduct carried out by SAPS (South African Police Service) officers, private individuals, and complicit legal figures. Below is a summary of the key criminal actions revealed in the timeline:

Unlawful Evictions and Home Invasions

Illegal eviction attempts without legal cause (December 24, 2021 – multiple instances in 2022)
SAPS (South African Police Service) officers knowingly assisting in unlawful evictions
Physical intimidation and forced removal of lawful occupants
Theft of property and illegal seizure of residences
Unlawful withholding of property keys and legal documents
Fabricated Criminal Cases and Malicious Prosecutions
Falsified police dockets used to justify arrests (July 29, 2022)
SAPS (South African Police Service) officers knowingly filing perjured affidavits
False allegations of theft, fraud, and property damage
Manipulated financial claims, inflating figures by over 2,000% to escalate charges
Use of illegal surveillance and tracking to engineer arrests
Judicial Interference and Collusion
SAPS (South African Police Service) officers refusing to take statements from victims of violence
Deliberate failure to execute court orders in favor of lawful occupants
Ignoring legal challenges and suppressing evidence
Fabricating protection orders through perjury (July 29 – August 4, 2022)
Direct intervention in court processes to rig bail hearings and prolong detention
Police Brutality and Unlawful Detentions
Arrests conducted without warrants (August 4, 2022)
Violent arrests, including the use of physical force and chokeholds
Denial of legal representation during initial detention
Illegal extended detentions beyond lawful timeframes
Fabrication of immigration violations to justify continued imprisonment
The deliberate use of Pollsmoor Prison to isolate and silence targets
Illegal Use of Private Investigators in Police Operations
Wouter de Swardt functioning as an extrajudicial law enforcement agent
Direct participation in searches, arrests, and interrogations
Coordination with SAPS (South African Police Service) officers to manipulate legal processes
Unlawful seizure of property and electronic devices without warrants
Orchestrated intimidation tactics, including surveillance and harassment
Financial and Property Theft Under SAPS (South African Police Service) Protection
Stolen property unlawfully seized by private individuals
Assets transferred to landlords while victims were detained
Fraudulent sale of properties based on false legal claims
Manipulated legal proceedings to secure asset forfeiture
SAPS (South African Police Service) refusal to investigate financial crimes committed by their private collaborators

Conclusion: A Systematic Abuse Of State Power

The chronology presented in this chapter is not just a timeline—it is an indictment. It lays out, in meticulous detail, how SAPS officers, private individuals, and legal figures conspired to weaponize the justice system for personal financial gain.

This was not a case of rogue officers making isolated mistakes—it was a structured, deliberate campaign of corruption, fraud, and state-sanctioned criminality. The actions outlined in this timeline prove beyond doubt that certain SAPS officers were not enforcing the law but actively subverting it, using their authority to facilitate private financial crimes.

This chapter will present the full timeline, allowing readers to see for themselves the precise sequence of unlawful actions, manipulated legal processes, and coordinated police misconduct. Every entry in the timeline represents an abuse of power—an abuse that was not only deliberate but executed with the clear objective of destroying legal opposition and securing financial control for those involved.

The events in this chapter stand as a case study in institutional corruption, demonstrating how a select few individuals were able to hijack police resources, manipulate judicial processes, and execute fraudulent legal maneuvers with impunity.

This is not speculation—it is documented fact. And this chapter ensures that those facts can never be erased.

CORRUPT RELATIONSHIPS: HOUT BAY SAPS’ REFUSAL TO ARREST KEITH BROAD DESPITE A HIGH COURT WARRANT

This chapter exposes one of the most egregious examples of police collusion and judicial defiance: the deliberate refusal of SAPS Hout Bay officers to execute a High Court-issued arrest warrant for Keith Broad. This is not an isolated incident but a clear example of the culture of corruption, complicity, and lawlessness that has enabled individuals with the right connections to evade justice, while SAPS officers actively obstruct legal processes to shield their associates.

Despite the High Court’s formal issuance of a warrant for Broad’s arrest, SAPS (South African Police Service) officers in Hout Bay—many of whom had personal or professional ties to Broad or his associates, including private investigator Wouter de Swardt—wilfully ignored it. Not only did they fail to act, but they also refused to provide an explanation, disregarded multiple legal demands for compliance, and directly undermined the judicial process.

The Legal Basis: The High Court’s Arrest Warrant

The High Court of South Africa issued an arrest warrant for Keith Broad, based on substantial evidence of his unlawful actions, including his involvement in a violent home invasion.
The warrant was not discretionary—it was a direct order requiring immediate enforcement by SAPS (South African Police Service).
Broad’s criminal activities included forced entry, destruction of property, and threats of violence, all of which were fully documented and legally substantiated.
This warrant followed extensive legal proceedings and judicial findings that necessitated his immediate detention.
SAPS (South African Police Service) Hout Bay had full knowledge of the warrant and was explicitly instructed to act upon it.

Yet, despite the legal obligation to execute the warrant, SAPS (South African Police Service) officers in Hout Bay ignored it entirely, making no effort to detain Broad and offering no justification for their inaction.

Attorney Interventions: SAPS (South African Police Service) ’ Defiance of Legal Demands

When it became clear that SAPS (South African Police Service) was refusing to execute the warrant, attorneys representing the affected parties took immediate action:

Formal letters were sent to SAPS (South African Police Service) commanders, demanding compliance with the High Court’s directive.
The letters highlighted the illegality of SAPS (South African Police Service)'s refusal to execute a valid arrest warrant.
Multiple follow-ups were made, insisting that SAPS (South African Police Service) officers fulfill their legal duties.
Despite repeated legal interventions, SAPS (South African Police Service) commanders continued to ignore the demand, refusing to respond or acknowledge their obligations.
The blatant defiance of the judicial system raised serious concerns about SAPS (South African Police Service) officers’ complicity in obstructing justice.

The Stark Contradiction: Ignoring a Valid Arrest Warrant While Executing an Illegal One

The deep-rooted corruption within SAPS (South African Police Service) Hout Bay becomes even more apparent when comparing their refusal to execute a valid, High Court-issued warrant for Keith Broad’s arrest with their enthusiastic participation in executing a baseless, warrantless arrest at the request of Broad and Wouter de Swardt.

This blatant double standard demonstrates that SAPS (South African Police Service) Hout Bay does not act based on the law, but rather on personal relationships, financial influence, and corruption.

A legally binding High Court arrest warrant was issued for Keith Broad—but SAPS (South African Police Service) Hout Bay deliberately ignored it, refusing to detain him, and failing to provide any justification.
When attorneys formally demanded compliance with the High Court order, SAPS (South African Police Service) officers refused to act and disregarded legal demands.
At the same time, SAPS (South African Police Service) officers immediately entertained false criminal charges brought by Broad and de Swardt, despite their full knowledge that these claims were fabricated.
SAPS (South African Police Service) officers had firsthand knowledge that Broad’s allegations were false, having personally attended the property in response to an earlier call regarding the alleged stolen TVs. They knew the claims were fraudulent but proceeded regardless.
Instead of investigating the legitimacy of Broad’s allegations, SAPS (South African Police Service) officers launched a full-scale manhunt, prioritizing fabricated charges over a court-sanctioned arrest warrant.
A warrantless, illegal arrest was then carried out on these false charges, violating due process and further exposing SAPS's role in selectively enforcing the law for their allies.
The detained individual was unlawfully held, denied legal representation, and subjected to a politically motivated detention, while Broad—who had a valid arrest warrant issued against him—was allowed to walk free without consequence.
SAPS (South African Police Service) knowingly acted outside the law, aggressively pursuing false allegations while deliberately ignoring a valid High Court ruling.

This case is a textbook example of corrupt policing: protecting criminals while persecuting those who challenge them. SAPS Hout Bay’s actions prove beyond doubt that their enforcement of the law is dictated not by justice, but by who they seek to shield and who they wish to target.

Conclusion: A Justice System Subverted by Institutionalized Corruption

The failure to execute the High Court-issued arrest warrant for Keith Broad is not just an isolated incident—it is a clear and undeniable example of SAPS (South African Police Service) Hout Bay’s systemic corruption. The blatant disregard for legal obligations, combined with the active protection of individuals with personal and financial ties to SAPS officers, represents a fundamental breach of the rule of law.

The juxtaposition of these two cases—the refusal to execute a legitimate High Court arrest warrant while aggressively acting on known false charges—proves that SAPS (South African Police Service) Hout Bay is operating as a private enforcement service rather than a legitimate law enforcement body. Their conduct is not just unethical—it is criminal.

They refused to arrest Keith Broad despite a lawful, court-issued warrant.
They executed an illegal, warrantless arrest based on false charges, knowingly fabricated by Broad and de Swardt.
They prioritized politically motivated arrests over judicial orders, proving that their actions are dictated by personal influence rather than the rule of law.
They knowingly participated in obstruction of justice, perjury, and wrongful imprisonment.

This is not law enforcement. This is a corrupt, collusive abuse of power, ensuring that criminals remain protected while their legal opponents are persecuted.

This chapter will present the full legal timeline, the attorney interventions, and the detailed record of SAPS's deliberate defiance of the law, demonstrating once again that corruption and complicity within SAPS (South African Police Service) are not accidental—they are structural, intentional, and deeply ingrained in the system.

THE 358 QUESTIONS WITHOUT CREDIBLE ANSWERS: EXPOSING SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION IN SAPS

This chapter is one of the most damning indictments of systemic corruption within SAPS (South African Police Service), exposing the blatant, unlawful, and orchestrated nature of my arrest, detention, and prosecution. It presents 358 fundamental questions—each of which, if answered honestly, would irrefutably expose the extent to which the police, landlords, private investigators, and media colluded to subvert justice.

The sheer volume of inconsistencies, procedural violations, and illegal conduct is so overwhelming that no rational explanation exists other than a deliberate campaign to weaponize the legal system for private financial gain.

This chapter systematically dismantles the case against me by revealing:

The complete absence of any legitimate investigation prior to my arrest.
The direct involvement of civilians in orchestrating police operations.
The illegal seizure of my properties, assets, and passport without lawful justification.
The timing of the arrest, eviction, and legal proceedings aligning with private interests.
The refusal to conduct basic investigative procedures that would have exonerated me.

The Pattern Of Collusion: Evidence That SAPS (South African Police Service) Was Acting For Private Interests

These 358 questions systematically highlight a disturbing pattern of misconduct. A real police investigation follows due process—officers gather evidence, interview witnesses, verify facts, and apply the law objectively. None of this occurred in my case. Instead, the evidence proves that:

Private individuals dictated the timing, execution, and objectives of the arrests.
Police officials fabricated evidence, ignored exculpatory proof, and manipulated legal procedures.
Every key action taken by SAPS (South African Police Service) served the interests of the landlords and their associates—not the pursuit of justice.

This chapter challenges SAPS (South African Police Service) to provide a single plausible explanation for their actions—knowing full well that none exist.

A Breakdown Of The Most Critical Questions That Demand Answers

The 358 questions raised in this chapter expose every major procedural violation, every contradiction, and every instance of collusion. Here, we outline some of the most significant areas of concern.

Why Was There No Investigation Prior to My Arrest?

A lawful arrest should follow a thorough investigation. Yet, SAPS (South African Police Service) had no evidence, no forensic analysis, and no corroborating testimony. Key questions include:

Why does the police docket contain only a handful of affidavits—all from individuals with direct conflicts of interest?
Why did SAPS (South African Police Service) never interview witnesses who could disprove the false allegations?
Why was no new evidence gathered for six months, then suddenly fabricated when it served the landlords' interests?

Why were Civilians Allowed to Control a Police Operation?

Why were private individuals, including Wouter de Swardt and Denis Dalton, present during the SAPS raid?
Why were they directing officers, handling evidence, and allowed to remain unsupervised at my property?
Who authorized their involvement, and under what legal framework?

Why Was My Arrest Timed to Align with My Legal Battle Against the Landlords?

Why did my arrest occur on the same day as my urgent civil court hearing?
Why did every SAPS (South African Police Service) action—raids, detentions, and legal manoeuvres—align perfectly with the landlords' interests?
Why was there no further police interest in pursuing charges once the landlords regained control of the properties?

Why Were My Assets and Passport Seized Illegally?

On what legal grounds was my passport taken, and why was it withheld despite multiple court rulings demanding its return?
Why did police seize control of my properties and unlawfully transfer them to the landlords without a court order?
Why did police ignore documented proof that my immigration status was legally valid at the time of my arrest?

Why Was There No Due Process in My Bail Application?

Why did SAPS (South African Police Service) misrepresent facts to the court to block my release?
Why were fraudulent affidavits submitted to justify my continued detention?
Why did the prosecution withdraw all charges upon first seeing the case docket—proving there was never a legitimate case?

The Inescapable Conclusion: A Deliberate, Pre-Meditated Conspiracy

Every single one of these 358 questions leads to one inescapable conclusion:

My arrest was never about law enforcement—it was an orchestrated, illegal operation designed to serve private financial interests.
SAPS (South African Police Service) officials acted as enforcers for private landlords, engaging in corruption, perjury, and procedural misconduct.
The total absence of legitimate police work proves that this was a campaign of persecution, not prosecution.

This chapter lays out the full breadth of SAPS (South African Police Service)' misconduct, exposing a case so riddled with corruption that no lawful justification exists for any of their actions. It presents an undeniable catalogue of legal violations, providing irrefutable evidence that my entire arrest and prosecution were unlawful from the outset.

IDENTICAL CONDUCT: THE STATISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE IN MY ARRESTS

This chapter demonstrates, beyond all doubt, that the legal cases brought against me were not isolated incidents, nor were they separate and legitimate investigations. Instead, they followed an identical playbook, executed by different police officers at different times but with the same private individuals directing both cases from behind the scenes.

The level of procedural misconduct, fabricated evidence, and manipulation across multiple cases is so identical that it defies all statistical probability of occurring by chance. The deliberate replication of tactics, methods, and outcomes is proof of an orchestrated conspiracy designed to achieve the same unlawful objective in multiple stages: to remove me, entrap me, and ensure that my properties and assets could be seized without challenge.

This chapter is one of the most critical pieces of evidence in proving the extent of the corruption because it exposes:

The near-identical actions of Sergeant Duna (first case) and Sergeant Stevens (subsequent cases), despite operating from different jurisdictions, at different times, and supposedly handling unrelated matters.
How each case followed the same strategy, timeline, and procedural abuses, ensuring my prolonged legal entrapment.
The statistical impossibility of these events occurring naturally, proving that this was not coincidence but a coordinated operation serving private interests.
The damning condemnation by multiple magistrates, who independently recognized that the cases had no legitimacy and were purely designed for illegal detention and financial benefit.

The Repeated Playbook: Three Cases, The Same Corrupt Strategy

By any legal or logical standard, the three cases against me should have had no connection to each other. They were:

Filed months apart.
Handled by separate police stations.
Investigated by different officers.
Initiated by supposedly unrelated complainants.

Yet, every single aspect of their execution, orchestration, and manipulation followed the exact same playbook—a pattern that is not only statistically improbable but legally indefensible.

Each case was initiated immediately after the previous one collapsed, ensuring I remained in legal jeopardy at all times.
Each case relied entirely on fabricated witness statements, dictated to individuals under duress or threat of prosecution.
Each arrest followed the same pattern of procedural violations—no proper investigation, no due diligence, and no exculpatory evidence considered.
Each bail hearing faced identical, baseless objections, designed to extend my imprisonment and prevent me from legally challenging my accusers.
Each charge was followed by media leaks, ensuring a false narrative was cemented before I could present the truth.

The only common denominator in these separate cases was the group of private individuals who engineered them, using different SAPS (South African Police Service) officers as their enforcers each time.

The Impossible Probability Of These Events Occurring By Chance

The staggering repetition of misconduct across three separate legal cases is not just suspicious—it is statistically impossible to have occurred naturally.

To illustrate the mathematical certainty of collusion, we calculate the probability of 60 identical procedural irregularities occurring in two cases. Even with a highly generous assumption that each irregularity had a 50% (1 in 2) chance of occurring randomly, the probability of all 60 happening in both cases is:

P=(1/2)60=1 In 1.15 Quintillion = (1/2)^{60} = 1 \Text{ In } 1.15 \Text{ Quintillion}P=(1/2)60=1 In 1.15 Quintillion

When extended across three cases, where the same 60+ procedural irregularities occurred in each, the probability becomes:

P=(1/2)120=1 In 1.3×1036 (1 In 1.3 Undecillion)P = (1/2)^{120} = 1 \Text{ In } 1.3 \Times 10^{36} \Text{ (1 In 1.3 Undecillion)}P=(1/2)120=1 In 1.3×1036 (1 In 1.3 Undecillion)

For context, the estimated number of atoms in the entire universe is only 10⁸⁰.

Even if we use a far more conservative estimate—assuming a 20% (1 in 5) chance of any given irregularity occurring naturally—the numbers still prove absolute impossibility:

For Two Cases: P=(1/5)60=1 In 8.67×1041\Text{For Two Cases: } P = (1/5)^{60} = 1 \Text{ In } 8.67 \Times 10^{41}For Two Cases: P=(1/5)60=1 In 8.67×1041 For Three Cases: P=(1/5)120=1 In 7.52×1083\Text{For Three Cases: } P = (1/5)^{120} = 1 \Text{ In } 7.52 \Times 10^{83}For Three Cases: P=(1/5)120=1 In 7.52×1083

These calculations demonstrate that the sequence of identical misconduct in my case could not have happened by accident. The mathematical certainty of collusion reinforces what is already clear:

The arrests were staged, planned, and executed using a repeatable formula.
SAPS (South African Police Service) officers were actively working under private direction, not independently investigating crimes.
Each new case was introduced as a contingency when the previous one fell apart.

The Magistrates' Condemnation: A Judicial System Alarmed By The Corruption

The most damning confirmation of this systemic misconduct comes not from me, but from two separate, unrelated magistrates, who each independently condemned the lack of evidence, procedural violations, and undue external influence over the cases against me.

The magistrate in the first arrest openly questioned how a case so devoid of merit had even reached his courtroom.
He rebuked the prosecution’s insistence on opposing bail, describing it as a blatant abuse of the judicial system.
He directly called out the improper influence of Wouter de Swardt, stating "this is my courtroom, not Mr. de Swardt’s."
A second magistrate, in an entirely separate case, issued an identical condemnation, further proving the systemic nature of the corruption.
Both magistrates demanded an official investigation—an extraordinary measure, confirming that even the judiciary recognized the severity of these abuses.

These independent judicial rulings destroy any argument that these cases were legitimate legal actions. The fact that two magistrates, without knowledge of each other’s rulings, reached the same damning conclusions is further proof that this was a coordinated conspiracy, not isolated police misconduct.

Conclusion: The Identical Conduct Proves This Was A Coordinated Criminal Operation

The repeated execution of the same unlawful strategy across three separate cases is not incompetence—it is criminal conspiracy. The identical procedural violations, identical fabricated evidence, identical false arrests, and identical abuse of the legal system prove a deliberate and orchestrated effort to entrap me, remove me from my properties, and enable financial gain for private individuals.

The SAPS (South African Police Service) officers involved were not operating independently—they were following a clear and deliberate strategy.
The cases against me were never about enforcing the law—they were about abusing the law as a weapon.
The statistical impossibility of coincidence confirms that this was planned, coordinated, and executed with precision.
The judicial condemnation from multiple magistrates proves that the courts themselves recognized this as a perversion of justice.

This chapter serves as an irrefutable indictment of the corruption, collusion, and manipulation of the justice system. It is not speculation, not opinion, but a fact-driven, evidence-backed exposé of one of the most blatant abuses of power in modern South African legal history.

This was not a series of unrelated cases. This was a criminal enterprise operating under the guise of law enforcement. And those responsible must be held accountable.

CORRUPT ABUSE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: BELLVILLE COMMERCIAL CRIMES UNIT, SERGEANT STEVENS & WOUTER DE SWARDT

The Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit (BCCU), under the direction of Sergeant Stevens, played a central and premeditated role in the orchestrated legal attack against me. This chapter provides detailed, irrefutable evidence that the criminal justice system was hijacked to serve private interests, weaponized to enable financial gain for landlords and private individuals, and deliberately misused to obstruct justice, fabricate charges, and sabotage my legal position.

What becomes immediately evident from the evidence presented is the direct, precise correlation between the timing of police activity and the objectives of the landlords and private complainants. If the SAPS (South African Police Service) and these landlords claim that the two matters were unrelated—i.e., that my arrests and detentions had no connection to the landlords' attempts to reclaim my properties—then the pattern of events should be random. Instead, the evidence overwhelmingly shows that police action was directly tied to the landlords' efforts, increasing when they needed legal leverage and ceasing entirely once they had succeeded in their goal.

This provable link between police operations and private financial interests forms the backbone of the case for systemic corruption, demonstrating:

Police officers acted as enforcers for landlords and private individuals, not as impartial law enforcement officials.
The use of arrest and detention was never about justice—it was a strategic tool to weaken my legal standing and force unlawful evictions.
Each landlord's engagement in "assisting the investigation" peaked when they needed to regain control of a property and disappeared the moment they had succeeded.
The timing of SAPS (South African Police Service) interventions, criminal charges, detentions, and case activity aligns perfectly with key moments in the landlords’ financial and legal campaigns.

A Coordinated Campaign: How SAPS (South African Police Service) And Private Parties Worked Together

This chapter presents the detailed breakdown of how three landlords, private investigator Wouter de Swardt, and Sergeant Stevens worked in unison. The correlation between their legal manoeuvres and the police's abusive conduct is undeniable.

For Paula Disberry (PD), the period of active police engagement lasted from December 2021 to October 2022—precisely the period during which she was attempting to reclaim her property through both civil and illegal means. Her activity peaked when I contested her eviction attempts in court. Once she succeeded, her involvement and SAPS activity ceased entirely.
For Keith Broad (KB), SAPS’ involvement aligns precisely with his legal and illegal efforts to regain the property. His initial attempts to unlawfully reclaim the property failed, leading him to engage Wouter de Swardt and SAPS from June 2022 onwards. The peak of SAPS involvement—the arrests, detentions, and malicious prosecutions—perfectly coincides with KB's most crucial legal battles. The final unlawful seizure of the property in April 2023 resulted in the immediate cessation of his and SAPS' activities.
For Ragi Moonsamy (RM), SAPS (South African Police Service)' engagement was perfectly synchronized with his opportunity to regain possession. Having been uninvolved for over a year, his activity suddenly began in November 2022, aligning exactly with the expiration of my prepaid lease period. His coordinated actions with SAPS (South African Police Service) enabled the unlawful eviction in December 2022, which occurred within the tiny window of opportunity that RM had available. Once his objective was achieved, his cooperation with SAPS (South African Police Service) ended immediately.
For SAPS (South African Police Service) itself, the Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit’s pattern of activity precisely followed the needs of these private individuals.

June 2022: SAPS activity spikes when KB escalates his efforts.

August 2022: My arrest coincides perfectly with KB’s immediate legal needs.

December 2022: My second arrest occurs at the exact moment that KB and RM required it to secure my properties.

March 2023: The extended remand period correlates with RM's need to finalize and legitimize his illegal takeover of my residence.

April 2023: Once KB succeeded in his court battle and RM had fully secured the property, all SAPS activity abruptly ceases.

If SAPS (South African Police Service) and Sergeant Stevens claim this was all coincidental, then they are suggesting that an astronomically improbable sequence of perfectly timed events occurred naturally. In reality, the evidence proves that SAPS was acting at the direction of private financial interests, not the law.

The Impossible Coincidence: Statistical Evidence Of Collusion

The sheer improbability of these events aligning purely by chance is mathematically staggering. Out of 1,100+ days since the beginning of the leases, my arrests occurred within a single day of the exact dates needed by the landlords. Not once, but twice.

If we were to assume that each individual event had a 1 in 2 (50%) chance of happening at any given time, the probability of these identical events occurring twice in separate cases would be:

(1/2)60=1 In 1.15 Quintillion(1/2)^{60} = 1 \Text{ In } 1.15 \Text{ Quintillion}(1/2)60=1 In 1.15 Quintillion

Applying this across all three cases:

(1/2)120=1 In 1.3×1036 (1 In 1.3 Undecillion)(1/2)^{120} = 1 \Text{ In } 1.3 \Times 10^{36} \Text{ (1 In 1.3 Undecillion)}(1/2)120=1 In 1.3×1036 (1 In 1.3 Undecillion)

These odds are beyond impossible. Even using a vastly more generous estimate, assuming each event had a 20% (1 in 5) chance of occurring randomly, the numbers still prove absolute impossibility:

(1/5)60=1 In 8.67×1041(1/5)^{60} = 1 \Text{ In } 8.67 \Times 10^{41}(1/5)60=1 In 8.67×1041

(1/5)120=1 In 7.52×1083(1/5)^{120} = 1 \Text{ In } 7.52 \Times 10^{83}(1/5)120=1 In 7.52×1083

For context, the estimated number of atoms in the entire universe is only 10⁸⁰.

There is no possibility that these events occurred without deliberate orchestration. The direct alignment between private financial interests and SAPS (South African Police Service) activities is evidence of corruption, not coincidence.

The Illegal Retention Of Evidence & Continued Threats

Even after the fraudulent charges collapsed, Sergeant Stevens and Bellville Commercial Crimes continued to manipulate the system to obstruct justice.

Despite holding my equipment for 600+ days, SAPS (South African Police Service) has refused to return it, claiming an ongoing investigation. This excuse is demonstrably false. If the investigation were legitimate, the data would have been processed within weeks.
The claim that further charges will be brought remains an open-ended threat, used to suppress legal action against those responsible.
The refusal to return my passport and legal documents is a calculated obstruction tactic, ensuring I cannot mount a full legal challenge.

These actions confirm that the abuse of the justice system was never about enforcing the law—it was about using the law as a weapon.

Conclusion: A Criminal Justice System Subverted For Private Gain

The coordinated misuse of SAPS (South African Police Service) resources, procedural misconduct, and manipulation of court proceedings proves that my arrests and legal battles were never about law enforcement. They were deliberate acts of legal warfare, executed to:

Illegally Dispossess Me Of My Properties
Render Me Financially And Legally Powerless
Ensure The Landlords Could Unlawfully Benefit From My Removal
Use The Criminal Justice System As A Tool For Private Gain

The overwhelming evidence confirms that SAPS (South African Police Service) officers, landlords, and private investigators colluded in an illegal operation. This was not law enforcement—this was state-backed organized crime.

THE USE AND ABUSE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR PRIVATE GAIN

The criminal justice system in South Africa is designed to uphold justice and protect citizens, but in my case, it was hijacked, manipulated, and abused to serve the financial and personal interests of private individuals. This chapter presents a fact-based, irrefutable account of how the law was turned into a weapon, how SAPS (South African Police Service), the NPA, and private individuals colluded, and how an elaborate campaign of deception, fraud, and intimidation was executed with the full cooperation of corrupt law enforcement officers.

This chapter lays out the clearest proof yet that my arrests and detentions had nothing to do with criminal offenses and everything to do with achieving financial and personal objectives for landlords, investigators, and opportunists. By abusing the criminal justice system, they were able to achieve what they could not have done legally:

Seizing properties unlawfully, without having to go through lengthy and expensive eviction proceedings.
Bypassing civil litigation entirely, avoiding courts, legal fees, and due process.
Using SAPS (South African Police Service) as a free, state-funded tool to enforce their private objectives.
Destroying my financial and legal ability to fight back by cutting off my income and assets.
Orchestrating a fraudulent media campaign to reinforce a public perception of guilt before any trial could take place.

This was not law enforcement—it was organized crime disguised as justice.

The Criminal Justice System As A Private Weapon

Rather than engage in legitimate legal proceedings, the landlords, Wouter de Swardt (WDS), and other private individuals chose a far easier, faster, and more destructive method:

Fabricate enough allegations to trigger an arrest.
Manipulate the legal system to keep me detained.
Seize my assets and properties while I am in prison.
Use police and media pressure to reinforce a false narrative of guilt.
Ensure financial exhaustion, leaving me unable to mount a legal defense.

Had they attempted this through legal channels, they would have faced years of litigation, hundreds of thousands in legal fees, and an uphill battle proving their claims in a fair court process. Instead, they bypassed all of that by enlisting corrupt SAPS officers to do their work for them—at no cost, using taxpayer-funded resources, and with immediate results.

The False Criminal Charges Were Always A Means To An End

If their objective had been to see justice served, why did the legal effort vanish the moment they secured by properties?
Why were the alleged “victims” never interested in restitution, only in ensuring I was detained?
Why did they not simply pursue civil claims if they believed they had suffered losses?
Why did SAPS (South African Police Service) immediately switch to a new set of charges every time one case collapsed?

The answer is simple: they never cared about justice—they cared about the result.

They did not want an investigation—they wanted an arrest.
They did not want a trial—they wanted an indefinite detention.
They did not want compensation—they wanted me removed.

The Manufacturing Of A Fraud Case Through Witness Manipulation

One of the most damning aspects of this case is the sheer scale of witness intimidation, coercion, and manufacturing of evidence.

Multiple managers were threatened with 10-30 years in prison unless they signed pre-written statements.
Guests who had minor complaints were actively discouraged from resolving them—because resolution would undermine the fraud narrative.
Police officers refused to consider any evidence proving my innocence, even when it was provided directly to them.
The entire case was constructed retroactively, with charges being formulated first, and evidence being fabricated to fit them later.

This pattern proves that the criminal case was never built on facts—it was built on coercion, lies, and the strategic withholding of exculpatory evidence.

The Bail Hearing Manipulation: How Wouter de Swardt And Saps Illegally Prevented My Release

Perhaps the clearest moment of outright criminal interference occurred on the day of my bail hearing, December 19, 2022.

The judge had already granted me bail.
I was about to be released and should have walked out that day.
Wouter De Swardt, unable to allow that, directly interfered with the court process.

At the last moment, Wouter De Swardt:

Called the Investigating Officer (IO) and instructed him to object to bail.
Had someone text or call the prosecutor, demanding an appeal.

Used entirely fabricated claims to justify keeping me in detention, including:

“At Least Five More Charges Are Coming.” (They Never Materialized.)
“Some New Cases From Paarl.” (They Never Materialized.
“He Is A Flight Risk.” (This Had Already Been Tested And Rejected In My Prior Bail Hearing.)

Based on nothing but Wouter De Swardt’s direct interference, the judge was forced to recall my case and reverse the decision. That is not justice. That is outright criminal collusion between a private investigator and SAPS (South African Police Service) officers.

The Financial Motive: What They Gained By Keeping Me Detained

Had I walked out on bail that day:

I would have returned to my properties.
I would have been able to stop the landlords from illegally taking control.
I could have regained access to my business, secured bookings, refunded clients, and stabilized operations.
I could have contested their fraudulent legal actions in real-time, blocking their attempts to sell my assets.

Keeping me in detention was the final move that ensured their complete success.

The properties were seized.
My ability to fight back was crippled.
They could proceed with financial gain without resistance.

The Destruction Of My Reputation As A Further Weapon

Beyond the legal abuse, an even greater attack was waged on my reputation.

Dozens of misleading articles were published, using SAPS (South African Police Service) statements as fact, despite no trial ever occurring.
Guests were deliberately misled into believing I had stolen from them, even when I had actively tried to refund them.
Every attempt was made to reinforce a public perception of guilt, ensuring that even after I was exonerated, the damage would be permanent.

This was not just a legal attack—it was a campaign to erase my ability to recover, to permanently brand me as a criminal, and to ensure I could never regain my business, reputation, or financial standing.

Conclusion: The Criminal Justice System As A Tool For Financial Conquest

This was never about justice—it was about execution.
It was about removing an obstacle, destroying my ability to fight back, and ensuring my adversaries profited.
The criminal justice system was hijacked, turned into a weapon, and used not for prosecution, but for persecution.

This chapter fully documents the systematic abuse of police resources, judicial manipulation, and outright corruption that turned a civil dispute into a state-sponsored attack. This is not a legal case—it is one of the most shocking abuses of power in modern South African legal history.

NEXT CHAPTER .....

CHAPTER SUMMARY PART 4

The Truth Suid Afrika

Discover the untold stories behind the false headlines of the Media24 articles. Uncover the truth behind the fabricated content of those articles. Understand the motivation that powered the consortium's actions.

'CHAPTER SUMMARY PART 4' - READ MORE

Screenshot 2025-03-10 001101_edited_edited_edited_edited_Compressed_edited.jpg

Screenshot 2025-03-30 160439_edited_edited_edited_edited_Compressed.jpg

"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

- Martin Luther King Jr.

NEXT CHAPTER ....

THE COLLECTION

The Truth Suid Afrika

'THE COLLECTION - READ MORE

12-Hove-Road-Transformed-Into-Luxury-Villa-By-Darren-Russell (43)_edited.jpg

JUSTICE 3i_edited_edited_edited_edited_edited_edited_Compressed_edited_Compressed.jpg

"Truth has power. And if we all gravitate toward similar ideas, maybe we do so because those ideas are true and written deep within us." - Richard Bach

CHAPTER SUMMARIES PART THREE : WEAPONISATION OF SAPS & THE MEDIA BY MEDIA24

Chapter Summaries Index – Overview of Key Campaign Pages

CHAPTER SUMMARIES, CHAPTER MENU AND SUBJECT INDEX

CORRUPTION, COLLUSION & COMPLICITY

Introduction: The Criminal Alliance Between SAPS Officers and Private Individuals

The Illegal Arrests: How SAPS (South African Police Service) Became an Instrument for Private Interests

The First Arrest: Illegal, Warrantless, and Coordinated for Financial Gain

The Role of Private Investigator Wouter de Swardt: A Civillian Dictating Police Actions

The Second Arrest: A Blueprint for Weaponizing the State

CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY: DELIBERATE WEAPONIZATION OF LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR PRIVATE GAIN

The Illicit Partnership: How SAPS (South African Police Service) Officers Became a Tool for Private Financial Interests

Case Study: The First Illegal Arrest (March 2022)

Case Study: The Second Illegal Arrest (May 2022)

The Judicial Interference and Perjury by SAPS Officers

Conclusion: SAPS (South African Police Service) as an Instrument for Criminal Collusion

Corruption and Criminality: The Deliberate Weaponization of Law Enforcement for Private Gain

The Illicit Partnership: How SAPS (South African Police Service) Officers Became a Tool for Private Financial Interests

Key aspects of their corrupt and criminal conduct included:

Illegal Arrests & Unlawful Detentions

Fabrication of Charges & Judicial Interference

Collusion with Private Investigator Wouter de Swardt

Obstruction of Justice & Witness Intimidation

Financial & Property-Related Crimes

Conclusion: A Case Study in Institutionalized Corruption

CORRUPTION AND CRIMINALITY: A CHRONOLOGY OF ORCHESTRATED INJUSTICE

The Orchestration Of My Arrests: Deliberate Manipulation Of The Justice System

First Arrest (4 August 2022) – False Charges, Fabricated Evidence, and an Orchestrated Bail Objection:

Second Arrest (December 2022) – Further Fraudulent Charges and a Coordinated Effort to Keep Me Detained:

The Corrupt Nexus: Law Enforcement, Private Interests, And Judicial Interference

The Campaign Of Systematic Sabotage And Financial Motive

Legal Implications And The Clear Evidence Of Conspiracy

UNLAWFUL CONDUCT OF SERGEANT STEVENS & BELVILLE COMMERCIAL CRIMES UNIT

A Systematic Campaign Of Abuse

The Theft And Sabotage Of My Immigration Status

The Fabrication Of Criminal Charges And Docket Manipulation

The Illegal Seizure Of Property And Financial Gain Of The Landlords

The Militarized Raid And Extreme Misuse Of State Resources

Direct Collusion Between SAPS (South African Police Service) And Private Investigators

The Pattern Of Corruption: Every Step Of The Process Was Manipulated

Unjustifiable Use Of Force And Corrupt Seizure Of Evidence

The Role Of Home Affairs And Immigration Manipulation

The Clear Legal Violations And Criminal Accountability

The Impact Of These Crimes

Conclusion: The Largest Case Of Corrupt Collusion In South African Law Enforcement

THE CRIMES OF BELLVILLE COMMERCIAL CRIMES UNIT:

A Case Built On Lies, Coercion, And State-Backed Threats

The False Charges And Fabricated Evidence

Witness Coercion: The Use Of Intimidation To Manufacture A Case

The Militarized Raid: A Spectacle Of Force Without Justification

The Illegal Seizure Of My Property And Data Suppression

The Role Of Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit In Suppressing Justice

Legal Ramifications: The Crimes Of Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit

Conclusion: Bellville Commercial Crimes Unit Must Be Held Accountable

SERGEANT STEVENS CHRONOLOGY OF CORRUPTION & CRIMINALITY

A Timeline Of Abuse: The Key Themes Revealed

The Evidence: A Detailed Record Of Unlawful Actions

Conclusion: A Systematic Abuse Of State Power

CORRUPT RELATIONSHIPS: HOUT BAY SAPS’ REFUSAL TO ARREST KEITH BROAD DESPITE A HIGH COURT WARRANT

The Legal Basis: The High Court’s Arrest Warrant

Attorney Interventions: SAPS (South African Police Service) ’ Defiance of Legal Demands

The Stark Contradiction: Ignoring a Valid Arrest Warrant While Executing an Illegal One

Conclusion: A Justice System Subverted by Institutionalized Corruption

THE 358 QUESTIONS WITHOUT CREDIBLE ANSWERS: EXPOSING SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION IN SAPS

The Pattern Of Collusion: Evidence That SAPS (South African Police Service) Was Acting For Private Interests

A Breakdown Of The Most Critical Questions That Demand Answers

The Inescapable Conclusion: A Deliberate, Pre-Meditated Conspiracy

IDENTICAL CONDUCT: THE STATISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE IN MY ARRESTS

The Repeated Playbook: Three Cases, The Same Corrupt Strategy

The Impossible Probability Of These Events Occurring By Chance

The Magistrates' Condemnation: A Judicial System Alarmed By The Corruption

Conclusion: The Identical Conduct Proves This Was A Coordinated Criminal Operation

CORRUPT ABUSE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: BELLVILLE COMMERCIAL CRIMES UNIT, SERGEANT STEVENS & WOUTER DE SWARDT

A Coordinated Campaign: How SAPS (South African Police Service) And Private Parties Worked Together

The Impossible Coincidence: Statistical Evidence Of Collusion

The Illegal Retention Of Evidence & Continued Threats

Conclusion: A Criminal Justice System Subverted For Private Gain

THE USE AND ABUSE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR PRIVATE GAIN

The Criminal Justice System As A Private Weapon

The False Criminal Charges Were Always A Means To An End

The Manufacturing Of A Fraud Case Through Witness Manipulation

CHAPTER SUMMARIES PART THREE :
WEAPONISATION OF SAPS & THE MEDIA BY MEDIA24