EYE WITNESS
ACCOUNTS
The Voices of Courage Amid Fear
The accounts that follow are not merely witness testimonies; they are the voices of individuals who stood against a tide of fear, manipulation, and systemic abuse. These are the stories of people who experienced firsthand the calculated actions of the Consortium and their accomplices within SAPS. Their courage to speak out has not only fortified my case but has also shone a light on the deeply entrenched corruption and criminal tactics employed to destroy lives for profit.
What makes these accounts extraordinary is the shared context of risk. Each witness faced threats, intimidation, and manipulation—many fearing for their safety if they dared to speak the truth. These are not individuals with agendas or vested interests. They came forward because their consciences would not allow them to remain silent.
The following individuals have provided their accounts:
-
Markus, the housekeeper of 16 Leirmans Road, who was unlawfully arrested during a secret and illegal raid staged under the guise of an official police operation. His testimony reveals the extent of collusion between private individuals and law enforcement to execute unlawful evictions and abuse of state power.
-
Chandre Abrahams, the portfolio manager, who endured relentless harassment and threats to coerce her into fabricating statements. Her steadfast refusal to perjure herself highlights the lengths to which the perpetrators went to manufacture a case against me.
-
Ollie Sokanyile, the property manager, who became a direct target for standing up against the unlawful actions of the landlords and their private investigator. His account details the violence and abuse he faced, including wrongful imprisonment.
-
Mario Boffa, the agent, whose chilling confession unveils the horrifying plot involving embezzlement, torture, and murder—planned to strip me of imagined wealth.
These stories, along with their supporting evidence—including recordings, transcripts, and documented interactions—paint a harrowing picture of the lengths to which the Consortium and their allies went to further their agenda. Links to comprehensive evidence are included for those seeking a deeper understanding.
EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNT LEIRMANS RD HOUSEKEEPER
HK: uh, but still would see that, uh, Mr. Wouter, was so in charge
HK: In my opinion. In my opinion.
HK: In my opinion, in my opinion Darren, definitely that guy was running the operation because he was, he was the one who was leading everyone even because I saw that at Leirmans,
HK: He was the one asking the questions.
HK: He was the one leading them to, to the rooms.
HK: He was the one doing this and that.
HK: So, I thought, I thought, oh, so this is a police in charge, the chief of police in Cape Town.
HK: I was like, oh, this should be a bigger case because even the big bosses here.
MARKUS: THE HOUSEKEEPER OF LEIRMANS ROAD
Caught in the Crossfire of Greed and Corruption
Markus, the housekeeper at 16 Leirmans Road, became an unwitting casualty in the Consortium’s ruthless campaign. As a loyal employee, Markus dutifully carried out his responsibilities, only to find himself caught in the sinister web woven by his employer and their associates. His testimony is a testament to the calculated abuse of power and disregard for human rights that defined their actions.
The Secret Raid and Unlawful Arrest
In December 2022, while attention was diverted to my arrest, Markus found himself at the center of a secret and illegal operation. Under the guise of a legitimate police action, a group led by Wouter de Swardt and involving both real and impersonated SAPS officers stormed the property. Markus, performing his duties as usual, was blindsided when these individuals entered the premises without lawful authority.
Threatened at gunpoint, Markus was handcuffed and forcibly removed from the property. Despite his protests and clear evidence that he had committed no crime, he was subjected to threats of violence, including explicit warnings that he would be shot if he resisted. The group confiscated his keys, locked him out of the property, and handed control back to Keith Broad.
EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNT LEIRMANS RD HOUSEKEEPER
HK: So that's why it really terrorised me because seeing all those bosses coming to a house that you are living, it should tell you that it's really big, big crime.
HK: Because you look at, you look at the doors, how the doors were smashed, almost each and every door was broken in two like, and the guy, Clement’s brother was like, he heard some like, uh, What some, not bombs, but what you call it, the, these, these things that they saw to make some noise. I don't know what to call them.
DR: Who, who's this? The police.
HK: Some blast. Okay. He had some blast. I don't know, maybe he was hearing them hitting the doors or what, but he said I had a lot of blast, you know, almost each and every room. So,
DR: Yeah, I, yeah, that's, that's all I could hear from upstairs was, was, was blasts.
HK: Yeah. It was like he saw some of the officers, the way they entered the house, some of them climbed the walls with the, I don't know, you know, those kind of like swat tactics. So, the things that we see in movies. So, I was like, yo, because I was trying to explain to him like, you know, they had to grab me by the belt, like, ah, I like you because for us, some of us, We were so under the cloud, this and that.
The Aftermath
Markus was not only removed from his place of work but also stripped of his dignity and security. His arrest served no purpose other than to further the Consortium’s goal of regaining control of the property while creating an atmosphere of fear and submission. Markus’s experience underscores the Consortium’s willingness to exploit and endanger innocent individuals to achieve their aims.
A Voice for Justice
Despite the trauma he endured, Markus bravely came forward to share his account. His testimony highlights the collusion between private individuals and SAPS officers in orchestrating illegal operations under false pretenses. It also provides critical insight into the use of intimidation and violence as tools to suppress opposition and silence witnesses.
Evidence supporting Markus’s account includes video footage of the raid, audio recordings of the threats he received, and official documents exposing the lack of lawful warrants or procedures. These materials can be accessed through the provided links.
TRANSCRIPT DOCUMENT
The Housekeeper’s Testimony: How the December 14 Arrests Were Used to Disguise Illegal Evictions
On December 14, 2022, both Markus, the housekeeper, and Darren Russell were illegally arrested in a coordinated operation designed to disguise two unlawful evictions as legitimate police actions.
Markus describes how SAPS officers—some real, some impersonated—stormed the property, forcibly removing him under threats of violence, while simultaneously seizing control of the residence for the landlords.
The transcript reveals explicit collusion between private individuals and law enforcement, proving that the arrests were never about justice—but about executing illegal property takeovers under false pretences.
CHANDRE ABRAHAMS:
THE PORTFOLIO MANAGER
Targeted for Doing the Right Thing
Chandre Abrahams, a portfolio manager with a reputation for integrity, became another victim in the Consortium’s campaign. Her professional dedication and willingness to uphold the truth made her a threat to their objectives, drawing her into their web of coercion, manipulation, and intimidation.
The Initial Involvement
As the property manager overseeing some of the Consortium’s properties, Chandre was an essential intermediary between landlords, tenants, and service providers. Her role required her to maintain meticulous records and mediate disputes—a position that often placed her in the crossfire of conflicting interests. However, she was not prepared for the scale of dishonesty and coercion that emerged during the Consortium’s campaign.
In 2022, Chandre was asked to produce documents and statements that would bolster the Consortium’s case against me. Despite immense pressure, she refused to falsify records or provide misleading information. Her decision to act ethically set off a chain of retaliatory actions designed to undermine her credibility and silence her.
The Retaliation
Chandre became the target of a coordinated effort to discredit and intimidate her. She was subjected to threats of legal action, defamation, and harassment, including direct pressure from Wouter de Swardt and his associates. On several occasions, she was coerced into meetings where she was pressured to alter official documents to align with the fabricated narrative being constructed against me.
Her refusal to cooperate led to her being labelled as “uncooperative” and "a liability." These tactics were not just designed to silence her but also to serve as a warning to others who might consider challenging the Consortium’s narrative.
The Breaking Point
The tipping point came when Chandre’s professional integrity was attacked publicly. False allegations were made against her, suggesting that she had been complicit in my alleged misconduct. These claims were not only baseless but also strategically designed to erode her standing within the property management community. Chandre was effectively blacklisted, losing clients and income as a direct result of the Consortium’s smear campaign.
Her Courageous Stand
Despite the immense personal and professional cost, Chandre stood her ground. She provided a detailed account of her experiences, highlighting the extent of the Consortium’s influence and their willingness to weaponize lies and threats to achieve their goals. Her testimony is a cornerstone in exposing the depth of corruption and misconduct at play.
Chandre’s account is supported by documented evidence, including correspondence showing the pressure placed on her to alter records, recordings of threatening communications, and affidavits confirming the false allegations made against her. These materials are accessible through the provided links.
CONVERSATION: PORTFOLIO MANAGER & MARIO BOFFA
MB Who is threatening you, because Paula and Peter is threatening me?
CA So, so basically, Paula said to me, and Benette, Benette who is the police, who is in the police force. She is insisting on a statement [Belville Commercial Crime]
CA Nooo, I can't do it. I can't do a statement because I can't lie. You can't lie!.. She is insisting heavily on a statement.
CA She is insisting heavily on a statement.
CA Nooo, I can't do it. I can't do a statement because I can't lie. You can't lie!
MB Like you said, while you were here, everything was running legitimately.
AUDIO RECORDING PORTFOLIO MANAGER CHANDRE ABRAHAMS, THREATENED WITH 10-30 YEARS IN PRISON
Chandre Abrahams’ Testimony: How She Was Pressured to Lie & Refused
This transcript exposes the relentless coercion campaign against Chandre Abrahams, a portfolio manager who was pressured by Paula Disberry, Wouter de Swardt, and others to sign a pre-written false witness statement. The exchanges reveal:
✔ She was repeatedly threatened with imprisonment (10–30 years) unless she complied.
✔ She was pressured to falsely claim she witnessed fraud—despite knowing everything was legitimate.
✔ She categorically rejected their demands, stating there was no fraud or criminality.
✔ The consortium’s desperation to fabricate evidence proves their case was baseless.
Chandre’s refusal to lie is a testament to her own integrity, honesty ad resolve, and exposes the depth of corruption behind the fabricated allegations, proving that the case was built entirely on coercion, deception, and intimidation.
TRANSCRIPT DOCUMENT
Chandre Abrahams’ Testimony: How She Was Pressured to Lie & Refused
This transcript exposes the relentless coercion campaign against Chandre Abrahams, a portfolio manager who was pressured by Paula Disberry, Wouter de Swardt, and others to sign a pre-written false witness statement. The exchanges reveal:
✔ She was repeatedly threatened with imprisonment (10–30 years) unless she complied.
✔ She was pressured to falsely claim she witnessed fraud—despite knowing everything was legitimate.
✔ She categorically rejected their demands, stating there was no fraud or criminality.
✔ The consortium’s desperation to fabricate evidence proves their case was baseless.
Chandre’s refusal to lie is a testament to her own integrity, honesty ad resolve, and exposes the depth of corruption behind the fabricated allegations, proving that the case was built entirely on coercion, deception, and intimidation.
OLLIE SOKANYILE: THE PROPERTY MANAGER
First Hand Experience Of Other Victims
A Target of Retaliation and Injustice
Ollie Sokanyile, a dedicated property manager known for his professionalism and loyalty, became an unfortunate target in the Consortium’s malicious campaign. His role in assisting both tenants and guests placed him in the crosshairs of those orchestrating the campaign, leading to unjust arrests, imprisonment, and professional sabotage.
The July 2022 Incident
Ollie’s troubles began in July 2022 when he responded to an urgent call from guests and the housekeeper of the Llandudno property. They reported a violent illegal eviction attempt led by Wouter de Swardt, accompanied by eight hired thugs. Acting out of duty and concern for the occupants’ safety, Ollie arrived at the scene to intervene.
Upon arrival, Ollie was met with aggression and intimidation. He was physically assaulted, verbally abused, and thrown out of the property by de Swardt and his associates. Despite his efforts to de-escalate the situation and protect the tenants, the property was overtaken, locks were changed, and the guests were left stranded on the street. Ollie’s intervention, however, was noted—and not forgotten.
VIDEO RECORDING
Wouter de Swardt Threatens Property Manager with Prison – 22 July
This footage captures Wouter de Swardt threatening Ollie — the on-site property manager — with prison for refusing to move out of the way during the illegal eviction. Six months later, de Swardt made good on the threat:
Ollie was arrested without cause, held in Hout Bay SAPS cells, and almost sent to Pollsmoor.
This video is central to the case, showing how de Swardt used SAPS connections to punish and silence those who opposed the campaign.
VIDEO RECORDING
Wouter de Swardt Goads Property Manager and Makes False Allegations – 22 July
This video captures Wouter de Swardt attempting to provoke Ollie, the on-site property manager, into calling Darren to the scene — while making knowingly false statements about him being in South Africa illegally.
At the time, de Swardt was in possession of Darren’s passport, which he had illegally withheld.
Ollie’s refusal to enable the trap ultimately led to his own arrest months later — a retaliatory act coordinated through SAPS. This video stands as evidence of defamation, provocation, and the campaign’s escalating abuse of legal systems.
VIDEO RECORDING
SAPS Officer Misrepresents the Law – 22 July Illegal Eviction
SOUND ENHANCED: Video from the 22 July illegal eviction showing a SAPS officer falsely claiming the eviction was “a civil matter” despite the absence of a court order.
This statement directly contradicted legal requirements under the Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act (PIE) and enabled the unlawful entry led by Wouter de Swardt on behalf of Keith Broad.
This is one of several instances of police complicity in the broader campaign to seize properties unlawfully.
Retaliatory Arrest and Imprisonment
Six months later, in December 2022, Ollie was targeted for his earlier actions. He was falsely accused of trespassing and other fabricated offenses, leading to his arrest and wrongful imprisonment. This arrest was not the product of a legitimate investigation but a calculated act of retaliation orchestrated by de Swardt and the Consortium.
Ollie’s time in custody was harrowing. He was detained under inhumane conditions and subjected to humiliation, all while knowing the charges against him were baseless. His imprisonment served no purpose other than to punish him for standing up against the Consortium’s illegal actions and to send a chilling message to anyone else considering opposition.
Professional and Personal Fallout
The arrest and imprisonment had a devastating impact on Ollie’s career and personal life. His reputation was tarnished, his credibility questioned, and his ability to secure new employment severely hindered. The Consortium’s narrative painted him as a rogue property manager, further isolating him from potential allies.
Courage in the Face of Adversity
Despite these challenges, Ollie remained steadfast in his commitment to the truth. He provided a detailed affidavit outlining the events of July 2022 and the subsequent retaliation he faced. His testimony sheds light on the lengths to which the Consortium and its associates were willing to go to silence dissent and maintain control.
Ollie’s account is corroborated by multiple sources, including eyewitness testimony, video evidence of the illegal eviction, and records of his arrest and detention. These materials are available through the provided links and serve as a testament to his bravery and integrity.
EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNT LEIRMANS RD HOUSEKEEPER
HK: Mm-hmm. Yeah. So that's my recollection. That's my, that's everything that I remember about the whole deal. Um, it was so traumatizing to me, you know, seeing the police, you know, I'm a law-abiding citizen. So, seeing the police, you're like, what did I do? You know? Um.
DR: But you said that they never, they never actually charged you with anything.
They told you; you were arrested. They didn't tell you what for but moved you to Fisherman's where they did the mugshots, but then they let you go. So, they ne they never actually gave you a, a crime that you're supposed to committed.
HK: Exactly. I was at, I didn’t understand I was told that I'm under, that's why they took me, uh, to, to Fisherman.
MARIO BOFFA: THE AGENT
A Reluctant Participant or a Willing Accomplice?
Mario Boffa occupies a unique position within this narrative. Unlike the other individuals whose lives and livelihoods were destroyed by the Consortium’s campaign, Mario was not a victim but a key player whose actions served to further their agenda. A real estate agent with long-standing relationships across the property sector, Mario’s role was crucial in executing the Consortium’s plans.
A Web of Relationships
Mario’s connection to the Consortium was far from incidental. His extensive dealings with Wouter de Swardt and key landlords in the Consortium placed him in an ideal position to act as an intermediary. However, these relationships went beyond professional ties. Evidence suggests that Mario’s involvement was rooted in a mix of personal alliances, shared financial interests, and, in some cases, questionable loyalties.
While Mario’s role was ostensibly to facilitate property transactions, he leveraged his insider status to support the Consortium’s campaign. His actions often blurred the line between legitimate business dealings and active complicity in corrupt practices. These included assisting with unlawful evictions, spreading misinformation about tenants, and enabling the manipulation of contracts to benefit the landlords.
Facilitator of Corruption
Mario’s role in the Consortium’s activities cannot be understated. As an agent familiar with the properties and the individuals involved, he provided critical logistical support. This included advising landlords on how to frame their false allegations, coordinating with private investigators, and exploiting his knowledge of the property market to create obstacles for tenants attempting to assert their rights.
Mario’s alignment with de Swardt and the landlords often placed him at the center of operations aimed at undermining tenants and forcing them out. His proximity to these individuals allowed him to act as a liaison, ensuring that the landlords’ interests were protected at all costs—even if that meant violating ethical and legal boundaries.
The Moral Ambiguity
While Mario’s exact motivations remain unclear, his actions suggest a willingness to prioritize personal gain over professional ethics. Unlike other agents who might have distanced themselves from such controversies, Mario appeared to embrace his role within the Consortium. Whether driven by financial incentives, personal allegiance, or a misguided sense of loyalty, his involvement paints a troubling picture of how systemic corruption can infiltrate even ostensibly neutral roles.
A Complicated Legacy
Mario’s involvement raises important questions about the role of real estate professionals in perpetuating or resisting systemic abuses. His actions were not those of an unwilling participant, but of an individual who chose to align himself with the Consortium’s objectives. This complicity, whether born of greed or naivety, contributed directly to the suffering of tenants and the unlawful gains of the landlords.
The Evidence Speaks
Mario’s role in the Consortium’s campaign is substantiated by communications, contractual arrangements, and testimony from other individuals involved. These materials highlight his centrality to the landlords’ efforts and his willingness to act against the interests of fairness and legality.
As with other sections, links to supporting documents, emails, and relevant evidence will provide additional context and clarity to Mario’s actions.
AUDIO RECORDINGS THE CONFESSIONS OF MARIO BOFFA; EMBEZZLEMENT, TORUTURE, MURDER AND THEFT
This hours of secretly recorded video footage, capturing Mario Boffa’s casual discussion of a premeditated criminal conspiracy involving Johann Schalkwyk, Denis Dalton, Andre du Rand, and himself. The exchanges reveal:
✔ Their plan to embezzle R1.2 million, detailing how financial accounts would be emptied.
✔ Their intent to drug, torture, and kill Darren Russell, ensuring no resistance or legal retaliation.
✔ The strategy to install Mario Boffa in his place, fabricating a disappearance to avoid suspicion.
✔ The complete lack of hesitation or remorse, proving this was a calculated, deliberate operation.
This transcript obliterates any plausible deniability, exposing the cold, methodical nature of the crime and the depth of corruption behind the conspiracy.
THE CONFESSIONS OF MARIO BOFFA: EMBEZZLEMENT, FRAUD, THEFT, CONSORTIUM CRIMINALITY, TORTURE & MURDER
Repulsed By The Graphic Detail. Not The Actual Act Of Murder
📌 DR: "Don’t do it. Or don’t talk about it?"
📌 MB: "No, don’t talk about it."
📌 DR: "You can do it—just don’t talk about it?"
📌 MB: "No, please don’t talk. I didn’t want to hear the details."
📌 MB: "They raved about it—how nobody would ever know. How it would be done." : "I begged them to stop. It was freaking me out."
📌 MB: "I said, 'Please stop. This is freaking me out.'"
📌 DR: "But they said… okay?"
📌 MB: "They would have got taken. Remember, they are so sick, and they believe either what Paula told them or whatever else convinced them." "They are so convinced that there are diamonds, money in this house, and millions on your phone. They know I know my way around a computer—so they needed me at some point."
📌 MB: "That’s why they wanted to first drug you. And I said, 'My mom said don’t do it.' So then they saw I was a bit resistant to it."
THE CONFESSIONS OF MARIO BOFFA: EMBEZZLEMENT, FRAUD, THEFT, CONSORTIUM CRIMINALITY, TORTURE & MURDER
Planned Violence & Digital Exploitation: The Strategy Unfolds
📌 MB: "Andre was ready—he wanted to start hitting you that day, putting you in a state where you'd be out, then handling the laptop and computer."
📌 DR: "That’s what he said about the dumbbells?"
📌 MB: "Yes."
📌 DR: "Hitting me with the dumbbells."
📌 MB: "Yeah, yeah. I said, 'You can't. Please, you can't do that. Everybody will see what he looks like. What if you kill him—then we have another body to get rid of?'"
TRANSCRIPT DOCUMENT
Mario Boffa’s Secretly Recorded Confession: A Criminal Plot to Embezzle, Torture & Murder
This transcript exposes hours of secretly recorded video footage, capturing Mario Boffa’s casual discussion of a premeditated criminal conspiracy involving Johann Schalkwyk, Denis Dalton, Andre du Rand, and himself. The exchanges reveal:
✔ Their plan to embezzle R1.2 million, detailing how financial accounts would be emptied.
✔ Their intent to drug, torture, and kill Darren Russell, ensuring no resistance or legal retaliation.
✔ The strategy to install Mario Boffa in his place, fabricating a disappearance to avoid suspicion.
✔ The complete lack of hesitation or remorse, proving this was a calculated, deliberate operation.
This transcript obliterates any plausible deniability, exposing the cold, methodical nature of the crime and the depth of corruption behind the conspiracy.
NEXT CHAPTER .....
EYE WITNESS ACCOUNT: HOUSEKEEPER'S ILLEGAL ARREST
The Truth Suid Afrika
Discover the untold stories behind the false headlines of the Media24 articles. Uncover the truth behind the fabricated content of those articles. Understand the motivation that powered the consortium's actions.
"When the privileged play the game, the rules bend for them; when the powerless play, the rules crush them." - Howard Zinn