THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Introduction: The Impossibility of Coincidence
The events surrounding my case—the precise timing of arrests, surges in SAPS activities, and their seamless alignment with the Consortium’s strategic objectives—defy the notion of mere coincidence. These actions reveal a deliberate campaign to exploit the criminal justice system, not to uphold justice, but to serve the personal and financial goals of private individuals.
Consider the timing of the arrests. The August arrest occurred just as Keith Broad sought to divert attention from a spoliation application I had filed. The December arrest followed days before the new owners of Fisherman’s Bend prepared to move in. In both instances, corrupt SAPS officers, including Sergeant Stevens, acted in synchrony with the landlords’ demands. This pattern of coordination is too precise to attribute to chance.
The statistical improbability of these events compounds the evidence of deliberate orchestration. To claim such alignments are coincidental is akin to asserting one could win the lottery multiple times in a row. Each action—arrests, docket manipulations, and fabricated charges—was meticulously timed to undermine my legal rights and secure the Consortium’s objectives. This was not a pursuit of justice but a calculated campaign to remove obstacles to their plans.
Beyond timing, SAPS activity surged only when landlords sought to reclaim properties I legally leased, then abruptly ceased once their objectives were achieved. These patterns expose the Consortium’s reliance on SAPS to carry out their strategy, underscoring the coordinated abuse of legal mechanisms.
THE STATISTCAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF "COINCIDENCE"
Fact File Statistical Improbability of Arrest Timing – August to March
When examining the 828 days since the criminal docket was opened, the probability of any single significant event—such as an arrest or charge—randomly aligning with a critical court date is 1 in 828.
The first arrest took place on 04 August 2022, the exact date of the spoliation hearing—then the most significant civil court event of the campaign. The second arrest followed on 14 December 2022, less than 24 hours after Broad’s High Court appeal was filed, and immediately before a hearing set to test the evidence.
The odds of two such events aligning with two separate, pivotal court dates is 1 in 685,584.
When factoring in the 14 March 2023 immigration charge—filed the day before the third key court hearing on 15 March 2023—the probability of all three aligning drops exponentially to 1 in 568,313,472.
The claim that these events occurred by coincidence is not only implausible—it is statistically indefensible.
To put this in perspective: the odds of all three arrests aligning with key court dates (1 in 568 million) are roughly equivalent to winning the national lottery jackpot eight times in a row — without buying extra tickets.
EVIDENCE
GRAPHICAL EVIDENCE: PRECISE INEXPLICABLE ALIGNMENT
Coordinated Attacks and Precise Alignment of Civil, Criminal, Illegal Evictions, Docket Activity and Media24's Fabricated Articles
This chart exposes the strategic alignment between civil litigation, criminal charges, illegal evictions, and the timed release of Media24 articles. Every escalation in court was mirrored by a media smear and a new unlawful act—from fabricated arrears claims to manufactured police action.
The overlap is not coincidental. It reveals a deliberate, sustained campaign to discredit, evict, and criminalise me while silencing the evidence of what I uncovered.
A Coordinated Campaign Disguised As Criminal Justice
"It is costing us a fortune to repair the damage to our property, which was supposed to provide us with an income."
Moreover, the contents of the docket and the investigating officers' conduct confirm the absence of legitimate criminal investigations. The docket lacked substantive evidence to justify the arrests or detentions, while delays in bail, the withholding of my passport, and the introduction of fabricated charges were all tools designed to prolong my incarceration.
Each action was intended to cripple my ability to defend myself in court or maintain control of my business.
The Consortium and their collaborators, including SAPS, claim these actions were legitimate. Yet, the cessation of these efforts once the landlords achieved their goals reveals the truth: these arrests, detentions, and fabrications were strategic moves in a broader campaign to neutralize me as an obstacle to their agenda.
The synergy between criminal justice actions, civil litigation, and Media24’s reporting further demonstrates the impossibility of coincidence. Over years, arrests, docket activities, media narratives, and court filings aligned so precisely with the Consortium’s strategy that they cannot be dismissed as random. This pattern underscores a deliberate conspiracy involving multiple parties working in concert to achieve shared goals.
Such systemic manipulation of justice to fulfil private interests is a grave affront to the rule of law. The alignment of these events—each compounding the statistical improbability—exposes the orchestrated campaign of corruption and abuse that demands accountability.
AUGUST CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
AUGUST CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
AUGUST CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
1) The spoliatio application was submitted on 26 July, KB notified 28 July
2) The date of the hearing was 4 August,
3) KB / IB lay the false theft charges and obtain P.O 29 July-1 Aug
4) Concerted moves to arrest begin immediately (by fluke i was in Pringle Bay) and continue through to morning of 4 August
5) Arrest executed 8am 4 August, too late to stop the proceedings
DECEMBER CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
1) An appeal to the November ruling was required between 6 and 16 December. The seizure warrant was applied for on 13 December. The same day Keith Broad filed his court application.
2) Two magistrates declined to authorise either an arrest warrant or a search and seizure warrant.
3) The seizure warrant obtained internally on the false premise of urgency at 8am on 14 Dec
3) Arrest made 10am.
4) application pushed through by K Broad while I was detained
MARCH CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
1) KB attempts to have the hearing while I am detained.
2) Heating date put back twice, so Serg Stevens continues to demand more time for "further investigation"
3) Final date is set at 15 March with my bail application due to stat 14 March
4) Prosecution drop all charges on first sight, to ensure i remained on remand Serg Stevens introduces a new charge, this time the bogus immigration charge to ensure my absense for the hearing .
IMPOSSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
The table demonstrates the impossibility of coincidence with all three sets of charges coming literally to the day when needed to provide a strategic advantage in the three most significant court dates of the entire relationship.
Court dates where my absence would be essential.
A relationship that spanned a year and a half and if the charges were genuine a period of four years
1. THE ARRESTS OF AUGUST & DECEMBER
The arrests were orchestrated to advance the ‘legal’ attempts in the civic courts. There should be absolutely no alignment with a genuine and independent criminal investigation , arrests and charges and the activity, hearings and individual needs in the civil courts..
First Arrest: August 4, 2022:
Following the illegal evictions of 22/24 July, my spoliation application was filed on 27 July, with the hearing scheduled for 4 August. Inge Broad had filed false charges (theft of three TVs and breaking and entering) on 29 July, setting up WdS and his connections in Hout Bay SAPS to arrest me.
The plan was clear: I could either withdraw the application and walk free or proceed and face extreme prejudice in the criminal justice system. Coincidentally, I was in Pringle Bay for a brief break due to fully booked villas, though I had intentionally chosen a location outside of WdS’s reach as we had expected a more physical attempt at removal.
On August 3, believing it was safe to return, I came back to Cape Town. The next morning, just before my attorneys were set to appear in court for the spoliation hearing, WdS, having illegally tracked my phone, forced entry onto the property and arrested me. Terrified, we had already called Central Cape Town SAPS for help. This arrest was not the outcome of a legitimate investigation; it was a calculated ploy by private individuals to manipulate the criminal justice system, ensuring I could not attend court.
The stakes could not have been higher: a win for me would affirm my sole legal right of occupancy, secure an interdict criminalizing any further illegal actions by Broad and WdS, and grant punitive costs, holding Broad liable for both parties' legal expenses of approximately R250,000.
A win for Broad, however, would deny me access, grant him sole legal possession, and leave me with substantial legal costs. I ultimately won on all counts, proving why they wanted me removed. Failing in their primary goal, they shifted to prolonging my detention to find new ways to retain control of the property..
ARREST AND UNLAWFUL DETENTION AS A WEAPON
How the Consortium Used Imprisonment to Eliminate Legal Opposition
This timeline chart exposes how arrests — and more critically, periods of detention — were deliberately timed to remove me as a legal opponent at key moments in the Consortium’s campaign.
Detention was not used to investigate alleged crimes but to silence opposition and prevent me from defending myself or instructing attorneys to challenge their lies in court.
The chart shows detention periods in white, while civil court hearings, fabricated filings, and media attacks by Media24 are marked in yellow, blue, and red — revealing precise coordination.
The goal was simple: with me silenced or physically absent, landlords including Keith Broad, Inge Broad, Paula Disberry, and Raj Moonsamy could submit perjured affidavits unopposed, relying on SAPS actors like Serg Duna, Serg Stevens, and Bellville Commercial Crime Unit to enforce this silencing.
The alignment with Media24’s defamatory articles proves this was no coincidence — it was a criminal strategy executed through calculated collaboration.
Second Arrest: December 14, 2022:
In the November application (the hearing WdS and Broad had postponed pursuing the illegal routes), I applied for the admission of oral evidence which would allow the parties to call witnesses and to cross-examine them and the evidence so that this much higher evidentiary bar would help expose the many lies within Broad’s application—something Keith was very keen to avoid. In early December, the court approved my application and set a date for April 2023. Broad, unhappy to wait any longer and even more unhappy the evidence would be scrutinized, faced a limited window to appeal, effectively expiring on December 16, 2022.
Broad and his attorneys, who had prepared the appeal between 6 and 11 December, filled it with fabricated evidence. Broad knew his case could not withstand scrutiny if I were present. On Broad's instruction, WdS had me arrested on December 14, allowing him to submit his application the following morning, knowing it would proceed unopposed, and ensuring that I was unaware of the submission and powerless to respond meaningfully even if I had known.
The seizure of my devices and data ensured that even if I became aware of the proceedings, the information and means by which I would instruct and brief attorneys to mount a defense no longer existed to me.
THE MORE THAN 100 ATTACKS BY THE CONSORTIUM
The table is a chronological list of the attacks by the landlords in their attempts to retake the properties. The scale, scope, illegality, immorality and hypocrisy of these attacks clearly show who the villains and victims were, who the aggressors were, and what the real goal was. Notice the attacks, including those via SAPS, Media24, and attempts to arrest, detain and extend detention cease once their goal was achieved.
Statistical Improbability of Coincidental Arrest Timing
The timing of my arrests aligned with the most critical court dates of the campaign—moments where my absence was essential to the success of the Consortium’s objectives. Over our 18-month lease and interactions, the probability of just one arrest coinciding with a crucial court date was already low, at approximately 1 in 540 (0.185%). The odds of both arrests aligning perfectly with pivotal hearings escalate dramatically to 1 in 291,600 (0.000343%).
Extending this calculation to encompass the entire 56-month period of my operations reveals an even more improbable figure: 1 in 840,000 (0.000119%). These probabilities alone make clear that these alignments were not random.
The absence of any subsequent arrests or attempts to target me further underscores the orchestrated nature of these actions—Broad and WdS had achieved their goals, leaving no need for additional efforts. The evidence reveals a deliberate exploitation of the justice system by private individuals to secure outcomes that lawful processes could not provide.
Looking at the timeline since my December 2022 arrest, 606 days have passed. The likelihood of a significant event, such as an arrest or a key court ruling, occurring on any specific day within this timeframe is 1 in 606.
The odds of two significant events, such as an arrest and a critical ruling, aligning on the same day drop to 1 in 367,236. This further highlights the rarity of such a coincidence. The timing of these events was evidently planned to ensure maximum disruption to my ability to defend myself.
Similarly, when examining the 828 days since the docket was opened, the statistical likelihood of key events aligning during this period is equally improbable. The odds of any single significant event occurring on a specific day are 1 in 828, while the probability of two such events aligning is 1 in 685,584. These figures illustrate the highly coordinated nature of the docket’s activity, with contributions and legal actions clustered strategically to align with the Consortium’s litigation milestones.
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: Docket activity, Illegal Evictions, & The Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign.
Every occasion of docket activity coincided not with any investigatory needs but aligned with the evictions and the key civil court dates with.
There is no possible explanation for activity on a SAPS docket aligning with the needs of private individuals in their attempts to take back the properties,
THE STATISTCAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF "COINCIDENCE"
Fact File Statistical Improbability of Arrest Timing – August to March
Expanding the timeline further, 1,137 days have passed since I first occupied the properties. The probability of a significant legal event occurring on any specific day within this timeline is 1 in 1,137.
For two critical events, such as an arrest and a court hearing, to align perfectly during this period, the odds plummet to 1 in 1,289,969—approximately 1 in 1.3 million. Such probabilities defy any reasonable explanation of chance and further reinforce the deliberate orchestration of events designed to disadvantage me at critical moments.
These timelines collectively demonstrate the astronomical improbability of these events aligning by chance. The 1,137-day timeline since my occupation reflects odds of 1 in 1,289,969 (approximately 1 in 1.3 million), while the 828-day docket timeline shows odds of 1 in 685,584 (about 1 in 685,000).
The 606-day period since my December arrest carries odds of 1 in 367,236 (about 1 in 367,000). The improbability of these alignments, combined with the outcomes achieved by the Consortium, eliminates any notion of coincidence. These events, spanning multiple years, reveal an unmistakable pattern of deliberate coordination to manipulate legal processes for private gain.
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: The Three Sets Of Charges & The Three Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign.
The three occasions SAPS laid charges coincided to the day with the needs of the three civil court dates, in particular the need for the hearings to proceed without an opponent
2. THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE MEDIA24 ARTICLES
The Disconnect Between the Allegations and Evidence, Versus the Direct Connection Between the Fabrications and De Swardt’s Narrative
Throughout Media24's articles, a glaring disconnect between the allegations and the available evidence is apparent. The content of these articles has little to no relationship with the truth. As the articles progress, this disconnect becomes more pronounced, with the narratives mirroring, parroting, and regurgitating De Swardt’s claims—not sporadically, but consistently and without exception.
Such alignment is not the product of coincidence; it reveals the source of the information and the absence of any journalistic investigation.
These articles demonstrate no effort to corroborate or fact-check claims and no attempt to present balanced reporting. Media24’s failure to engage with me underscores their disinterest in uncovering the truth. Instead, their publications promoted a narrative designed and perpetuated by De Swardt to serve his agenda.
The fabrications starkly contradicted available evidence, confirming that Media24 prioritized agenda-driven reporting over journalistic integrity. For instance, Media24’s portrayal of me as “an alleged luxury accommodation scammer” who “defrauded property owners along Cape Town's Atlantic Seaboard and unsuspecting tourists” directly mirrored De Swardt’s claims, without independent verification (Violates: 1.1, 1.3, and 2.1).
A Comprehensive Review of Allegations
To pre-empt any dismissal of the synergy between the WdS/Broad campaign and the articles’ content, I conducted a detailed review.
First, I catalogued every fabricated claim made by Keith and Inge Broad, De Swardt, and the Consortium between December 2021 and July 2022. These claims spanned multiple forums, including civil court submissions, attorney communications, and malicious prosecutions, amounting to over fifty distinct allegations and derivatives.
Next, I extracted the allegations from the Media24 articles. Remarkably, every single claim made by the Consortium was represented in the articles. No allegations from the Broads or De Swardt were omitted, nor were there any new claims in the articles that had not originated from the Consortium. The complete overlap between the Consortium's fabrications and Media24’s articles transcends bias—it is a direct amplification of every falsehood propagated by Keith and Inge Broad and De Swardt.
CALCULATED STRATEGY
Every major event in this campaign occurred entirely within two critical timeframes, marked on the chart by the two blue lines.
The sequence of SAPS actions (arrests, detentions), court filings, and media attacks moved in exact alignment with the attempts to unlawfully seize properties under lease agreements. When the final property was forcefully taken back, all activity - 'legal', criminal, and media - immediately ceased.
Proving the campaign was not about justice, but a calculated strategy to unlawfully dispossess tenants under the guise of procedural legitimacy.
Statistical Impossibility of Alignment
The statistical likelihood of such alignment occurring by chance is virtually impossible. Assuming a conservative probability of 1 in 10 for each allegation aligning independently, the odds of all 50+ claims aligning perfectly would be 1 in 10^50—a figure so astronomically small it equates to roughly 1 in a nonillion. This level of correlation eliminates any possibility of coincidence, firmly establishing that the alignment was deliberate and coordinated. [Analysis of Sources and Allegations]
Media24’s Role in the Campaign
The direct correlation between the Consortium’s fabrications and Media24’s publications reveals a calculated and deliberate strategy. Every allegation made by Keith and Inge Broad was mirrored in the articles without deviation, transforming them from independent news reports into tools the Consortium could wield as “authoritative” evidence in legal proceedings. The impossible odds of this alignment being incidental leave no room for doubt: this was not journalism, but a deliberate and unchecked amplification of a single agenda. Media24 was complicit in misrepresenting unverified allegations as truth, undermining the integrity of their reporting.
From August 2022 to February 2023, Media24 published articles that mirrored every claim made by the Consortium from December 2021 to July 2022. The alignment was so precise that these articles could be presented in court as corroborative evidence. This level of synchronization defies logic. Assuming even modest probabilities for alignment, the statistical odds confirm that this was coordinated by design. A detailed comparison [Analysis of Sources and Allegations] highlights the precision of this alignment.
Unreported Facts
None of this—and indeed, none of the facts outlined in this complaint, annexures, or the extensive documentation I have meticulously compiled—was ever reported by Media24. The hundreds of folders and files of evidence that counter these fabricated narratives remain entirely absent from their coverage, ensuring that readers are left with a one-sided and manipulated account of events.
THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT: MEDIA24'S FABRICATED ARTICLES & THE CONSORTIUMS CAMPAIGN
The unmistakable and precise alignment between the publication of the articles by Media24, and the campaign by the consortium.
As aligned as the specific timing of the articles was the start and finish of the series of articles. Starting when needed and ending when the goals had been achieved.
THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT: MEDIA24'S FABRICATED ARTICLES & THE CONSORTIUMS CAMPAIGN
The unmistakable and precise alignment between the publication of the articles by Media24, and the campaign by the consortium.
As aligned as the specific timing of the articles was the start and finish of the series of articles. Starting when needed and ending when the goals had been achieved.
3. THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT OF THE DOCKET'S ACTIVITY
The Docket: A Tool for Strategic Manipulation
This alignment was not incidental; it reflects a deliberate and coordinated effort to manipulate legal outcomes by exploiting the justice system for private interests. The timing of its contributions, clustered exclusively around critical litigation milestones, demonstrates that it was never a genuine investigative tool but rather a mechanism to exert leverage at pivotal moments. This pattern of dormancy and strategic reprioritization underscores its role as a tactical asset rather than an instrument of justice.
Orchestrated Timing of Docket Activity
Every instance of docket activity coincided with pivotal civil litigation milestones. Contributions were reactive, not investigative, reflecting a calculated effort to manipulate outcomes rather than uncover truth. Key patterns include:
Bursts of Activity: Contributions to the docket occurred exclusively during moments when the Consortium required leverage in court. These bursts were followed by extended periods of inactivity, revealing a clear pattern of strategic timing rather than systematic investigation.
June 7 Affidavit Cluster: On June 7 and 8, 2022, Paula Disberry coordinated affidavits from witnesses across continents. The sudden appearance of these documents created the illusion of substantial evidence, aligning precisely with her failing civil court strategy. The synchronization of these submissions highlights the reactive and coordinated nature of the docket’s activity.
THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Impossible Convergence of Criminal Charges, Civil Hearings, and Media24 Lies
This chart tracks the exact overlap between the key civil court filing periods, the arrests, detentions, major court hearings, and Media24's defamatory articles
Events that should bear no relation to each other, yet each aligns exactly with the Consortium's active campaign strategy.
Whether assessed over the life of the leases or the full span of relationships with the owners, these timeframes - measured in years - show arrests and detentions landing precisely within the narrow filing windows, often just days wide.
The synchronised bursts of legal and media action are not coincidental. They prove the campaign was coordinated, calculated and criminal.
Impossibility of Coincidence
The improbability of these alignments occurring by chance is staggering. The docket’s sporadic activity, limited to moments critical to civil litigation outcomes, defies any explanation of coincidence. For instance:
Coinciding Arrests with Civil Court Dates: Both the August 4 and December 14, 2022, arrests aligned perfectly with the most critical court dates in the civil litigation battle. These arrests disrupted my ability to respond effectively, creating opportunities for unopposed legal action by the Consortium.
Absence of Evidence Before and After Arrests: No substantive evidence existed in the docket prior to these arrests, nor was any added afterward. Despite access to years of personal and professional data, the investigating officers provided no legitimate contributions, underscoring that prosecution was never the intent—only prolonged detention and strategic disruption.
THE "DOCKET" IN NAME ONLY
THE WAFER THIN FOLDER THEY CALLED A "DOCKET"
Irrefutable legal outcomes proving my position was substantiated, the opposing claims dismantled, yet detention was still executed before judgements could be known
A table exposing the complete lack of investigative activity from SAPS, Bellville Commercial Crime Unit, Hout Bay & Camps Bay SAPS, while all documented movements align directly with civil court deadlines dictated by private individuals.
The table presents irrefutable proof that no genuine police investigation took place.
Sergeant Stevens, Sergeant Duna, Bellville Crime Unit, Hout Bay & Camps Bay SAPS contributing nothing to criminal inquiries - ZERO EVIDENCE GATHERING, NO PROCEDURAL ACTION, AND NO INDEPENDENT CASE DEVELOPMENT.
Dormancy and Strategic Reprioritization
Following the June submissions, the docket remained dormant for six months, only to be abruptly reprioritized for my arrests. This pattern of inactivity followed by sudden bursts of activity demonstrates the reactive nature of the docket’s use. It was not an investigative document but a tool manipulated to achieve specific objectives at critical junctures in civil litigation.
Absence of Evidence from Key SAPS Divisions
Despite the docket’s purported purpose, key SAPS divisions contributed nothing of investigative value:
Belville Commercial Crime, Hout Bay SAPS, and Camps Bay SAPS provided no substantive evidence. Investigating Officers Duna and Stevens failed to produce any meaningful contributions, further confirming the docket’s inadequacy.
Paula Disberry’s Contributions: The only substantive additions came from Disberry, timed precisely to align with her needs in civil court. Her use of the docket highlights its exploitation for personal gain rather than justice.
Conclusion
The docket’s activity, content, and timing reveal a calculated effort to manipulate legal processes for private advantage. Its alignment with pivotal civil litigation milestones, combined with extended periods of dormancy, underscores its reactive and strategic nature. This deliberate orchestration, devoid of legitimate evidence or investigative intent, reflects systemic abuse where legal tools were weaponized to achieve predetermined outcomes. The improbability of these alignments occurring naturally demands scrutiny and accountability, as they epitomize the corruption and exploitation undermining justice and the rule of law.
STATISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Impossible Convergence of Criminal Charges, Civil Hearings, & Media24 Lies
Every major event in this campaign—from civil court case hearings, illegal arrests, trumped up charges, malicious prosecutions, unlawful detentions, Media24’s defamatory coverage, occurred entirely within two critical time points, marked on the chart by the two blue lines:
The start and end of Wouter de Swardt’s involvement in the coordinated effort to take back the properties which in itself coincided with the first and last successful such property grab.
The sequence of SAPS actions (arrests, detentions), court filings, and media attacks moved in exact alignment with the attempts to unlawfully seize properties.
When the final property was forcefully taken back, all activity - ‘legal,’ criminal, and media- immediately ceased. activities that should have had no relationships to the landlords own personal and private goals – supposed criminal investigations, supposed investigative reporting, supposed criminal trials or proceedings through the criminal justice system – all ceased.
Proving the campaign was not about justice, but a calculated strategy to unlawfully dispossess tenants under the guise of procedural legitimacy.
4. THE DECEMBER ARREST'S PERFECT ALIGNMENT
A Coordinated Abuse Of Power
The December arrest reveals a calculated campaign of corruption and greed. It was not merely an isolated event but part of a broader strategy to weaponize the criminal justice system for personal and financial gain.
Correspondence, recordings, and legal documents confirm how private individuals commandeered state resources to execute their plan, highlighting systemic corruption and deliberate abuse of power.
The evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that this arrest was timed and orchestrated to achieve specific outcomes, leaving no doubt about the motives and intent behind it.
REASONS FOR & TIMING OF THE DECEMBER ARREST
DECEMBER ARREST: TIMED FOR PRIVATE GAIN, NOT CRIMINAL JUSTICE
30 Distinct reasons behind the December arrest proving it was a not a police-led criminal case
The table shows both the reasons for the arrest & for it's timing.
Every one of which is dictated by the needs & wants of the private individuals behind the arrests & detentions - Wouter De Swardt, Paula Disberry, Keith & Inge Broad, Raj Moonsamy, Maureen & Richard Schaffer.
All owners of the properties I transformed & they took back afterwards.
- Mapped to specific financial objectives, rental market timing & legal deadlines
- Not a police-led criminal case but a premeditated arrest by private interests, concealed behind procedural mechanisms to achieve financial & legal dominance!
5. THE IMMIGRATION CHARGE'S CONVENIENT TIMING
On March 14, 2023, as the prosecution was preparing to withdraw all charges against me, the Investigating Officer introduced a new and entirely fabricated immigration charge. This addition was clearly designed to delay my release, coinciding strategically with the impending high court hearings scheduled for the next day. This move was not only legally dubious but transparently aligned with the Consortium's pattern of timing legal actions to disrupt my ability to defend myself effectively.
The timing of this charge reflects the same deliberate orchestration seen in the previous coincidences. It ensured that my absence from the high court hearings, where Keith Broad’s lies would have been exposed, was extended. The fabricated charge served no legitimate legal purpose but instead acted as another tool to manipulate the legal process in favour of private interests.
The Motive Behind the Charge
This bogus charge was not merely an attempt to prolong my detention but served a dual purpose. By keeping me incarcerated, the Investigating Officer ensured my absence from critical civil court proceedings where my attendance and preparation would have exposed Broad’s falsehoods. My absence was essential for Broad’s success, as even minimal participation on my part would have been enough to dismantle his fabricated narrative.
Moreover, the timing of the charge—introduced just as the prosecution ceased objecting to bail—demonstrates the desperate lengths to which the Investigating Officer and his collaborators were willing to go. The Investigating Officer’s insistence on an exorbitant bail amount of R100,000 further underscores the malicious intent. This amount bore no relation to the alleged offense and was rightly reduced to R10,000 by the magistrate, who recognized the absurdity of the demand.
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: Arrests Charges, Media24, Civil Court Dates, Illegal & The Three Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign.
The start and end of the series of articles aligning precisely wit the star and finish of the Wouter de Swardt's role in the campaign and likewise the start and finish of the property grabs.
The Details of the Fabrication
The immigration charge alleged that I had failed to leave South Africa in March 2021. This accusation was impossible for several reasons. Firstly, the Department of Home Affairs had automatically extended visas for all individuals who had entered South Africa at the same time I did, covering the period in question. Secondly, I had applied for and received a valid visa extension in late 2021, which extended my legal stay well into 2022. This information was readily available to the Investigating Officer, as it was documented in my passport—a passport that he had illegally retained since early 2022.
Despite possessing this evidence, the Investigating Officer misrepresented the facts to the prosecution. He also failed to disclose that my inability to apply for further visa extensions was due to the illegal theft and withholding of my passport by SAPS throughout 2022 and into 2023.
The Broader Context
The introduction of the immigration charge aligns seamlessly with the broader pattern of abuse and manipulation. Like the arrests, docket activity, and media narratives, this charge was timed and crafted to serve the Consortium’s objectives. It exemplifies how legal mechanisms were weaponized to prevent my participation in proceedings, destabilize my defense, and protect the lies underpinning the Consortium’s strategy.
This fifth coincidence further underscores the deliberate and coordinated nature of the campaign against me, adding yet another layer of improbability to the sequence of events. It highlights how private interests commandeered public legal processes to achieve their ends, sacrificing justice in the process.
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: Arrests Charges, Media24, Civil Court Dates, Illegal & The Three Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign
THE CUMULATIVE IMPACT OF THE COINCIDENCES
When examining the timing of the key events, it becomes undeniable that these events were neither random nor independent. Instead, they reveal a meticulously planned and coordinated effort to achieve specific outcomes.
1. The August and December arrests and their alignment with key civil court hearings
2. The docket activity
3. The publication and timing of Media24 articles,
4. The specific reasons for the December arrest and its timing
5. The introduction of the bogus immigration charge and its timing.
Each layer of coincidence compounds the improbability, creating a sequence of events so statistically rare that they defy any explanation of chance.
What is striking is the precise correlation of the above with the civil proceedings and the illegal attempts to retake the properties
There is no legitimate scenario in which the attempts by private individuals to illegally take over properties or their proceedings to do so via the civil courts should align with the activities of SAPS in the criminal justice arena.
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: Arrests Charges, Media24, Civil Court Dates, Illegal & The Three Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign. The start and end of the series of articles aligning precisely wit the star and finish of the Wouter de Swardt's role in the campaign and likewise the start and finish of the property grabs.
An Astronomical Improbability
The improbability of these alignments can be compared to the odds of winning a major lottery. The likelihood of one arrest coinciding with a critical court date is already minuscule—approximately 1 in 540 (0.185%). The odds of both arrests aligning with such pivotal dates escalate to an extraordinary 1 in 291,600 (0.000343%).
Factoring in the timing of Media24’s articles, docket activity, the December arrest, and the bogus immigration charge, the probability of all these events aligning is reduced to figures approaching 1 in a billion or even 1 in a trillion. For perspective, these odds are far rarer than winning lotteries like Powerball (1 in 292,201,338) or Mega Millions (1 in 302,575,350).
The Alignment of Key Events
The August and December arrests exemplify this improbable alignment. Both were executed on dates when my absence was critical to the Consortium’s objectives. The August arrest prevented my attendance at a spoliation hearing that would have affirmed my legal rights to the properties. The December arrest coincided perfectly with Broad’s filing of a fabricated appeal, ensuring my incapacity to challenge his claims during the judicial system’s holiday period.
Media24’s articles played a parallel role in this campaign, aligning with the Consortium’s fabrications to provide an appearance of credibility. These publications mirrored the Consortium’s falsehoods so precisely that they became a tool for bolstering unverified allegations in court and public forums.
The timing of the bogus immigration charge in March 2023 adds another layer of improbability. Introduced on the eve of high court hearings, the charge ensured my continued incarceration, preventing my participation in proceedings where
Broad’s fabrications would have been exposed. This move was emblematic of the broader
strategy to exploit the justice system to neutralize opposition and shield the Consortium’s agenda from scrutiny.
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: Arrests Charges, Media24, Civil Court Dates, Illegal & The Three Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign
The Outcomes Demonstrate The Malicious Nature Of The Prosecutions.
The table below shows the various charges, who the investigating officer was, the outcomes for each, and whether the outcomes were published or just the charges. What the table shows is that every charge was thrown out once it was out of the hands of the corrupt SAPS officer and scrutinized by the courts and NPA.
Serg Stevens and Mr. de Swardt made significant capital out of my arrest, the charges, and my incarceration. But the stories they fed to the media only ever involved reporting the allegations, criminal charges, and remand. The outcomes were never reported.
As the purpose of the allegations, charges, and remand was the disguised execution of the illegal evictions, the removal of me as the tenant, and my incarceration to legitimize and consolidate their property grabs, as well as ruin me financially and reputationally, in many respects, the outcomes did not matter to those who ran the campaign.
OUTCOMES AS EVIDENCE
Outcomes as Evidence: The Collapse of False Allegations Under Legal Scrutiny
This table presents indisputable proof that every charge, detention, and legal proceeding was built on fabricated claims—and every attempt to uphold these fabrications ultimately failed in court.
📌 Case Withdrawals & Dismissals:
Every accusation collapsed when examined under judicial scrutiny. Charges were withdrawn, cases were dismissed, and legal motions against misconduct were upheld—conclusively disproving the fraudulent claims used to justify arrests and asset seizures.
📌 Judicial Findings:
Courts recognized that procedural abuses and fabricated evidence formed the basis of multiple wrongful detentions. Legal outcomes repeatedly vindicated the accused, reinforcing the scale of corruption that led to these unlawful actions.
📌 Systemic Abuse Confirmed:
The documented failures of these cases serve as direct evidence of state-enabled misconduct. The justice system was manipulated to create legal threats, but at every stage where facts were weighed against accusations, the truth prevailed.
📌 No Accountability Despite Legal Failures:
Despite repeated legal vindications, those responsible for the false charges faced no consequences, ensuring the cycle of abuse continued unchecked. The justice system was used as a weapon—but its own rulings exposed the deception behind the fabricated legal claims.
The Respective Lists of Alleged Crimes: Consortium vs. Me
All of the charges against me were malicious prosecutions, each with its own purpose, and all were withdrawn. Importantly, the moment each charge was outside the purview of the specific SAPS officers and under any scrutiny, they were found to be wholly false, fabricated, and/or manipulated. Whether via the bail applications (mini trials), the Representations to the Senior Public Prosecutor, or attorney discussions with the NPA, the charges against me have been fully examined and found to be without merit.
However, not one of the crimes committed by the consortium or their proxies has yet been investigated or tested. The list, which is not yet complete, exceeds seven hundred individual offenses. Even if a fraction were to proceed to court, the sentences would be measured in multiple decades per individual.
The landlords lost the ability to pretend the arrest was in no way connected to them and that they were merely observers dealing with a situation not of their making when they instructed their attorney to appear at the bail application to inform the court that I would not be permitted entry to either of the properties.
The main purpose of this was to deny me a bail address, which would make bail impossible. What it also did was demonstrate that I had been illegally evicted. The landlords had no right to deny me re-entry or occupation, and no court order existed to that effect.
STATISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Impossible Convergence of Criminal Charges, Civil Hearings, & Media24 Lies
Every major event in this campaign—from civil court case hearings, illegal arrests, trumped up charges, malicious prosecutions, unlawful detentions, Media24’s defamatory coverage, occurred entirely within two critical time points, marked on the chart by the two blue lines:
The start and end of Wouter de Swardt’s involvement in the coordinated effort to take back the properties which in itself coincided with the first and last successful such property grab.
The sequence of SAPS actions (arrests, detentions), court filings, and media attacks moved in exact alignment with the attempts to unlawfully seize properties.
The sequence of SAPS actions (arrests, detentions), court filings, and media attacks moved in exact alignment with the attempts to unlawfully seize properties.
When the final property was forcefully taken back, all activity - ‘legal,’ criminal, and media- immediately ceased. activities that should have had no relationships to the landlords own personal and private goals – supposed criminal investigations, supposed investigative reporting, supposed criminal trials or proceedings through the criminal justice system – all ceased.
Proving the campaign was not about justice, but a calculated strategy to unlawfully dispossess tenants under the guise of procedural legitimacy.
"The belief that there is only one truth, and that oneself is in possession of it, is the root of all evil in the world." - Max Born