THE CONSORTIUM'S MANY AND VARIED ATTACKS
The Dozens of Strategic Attacks on Revenue and the Fabricated Narrative of Rent Arrears
The allegation of rent arrears is particularly deceitful and misleading. It represents not only an audacious attempt to misrepresent the facts but also highlights the motives, methods, and hypocrisy of those conducting the campaign.
From the outset, landlords like Keith Broad (KB) and Inge Broad pushed the false narrative that the modus operandi was to lease properties, pay rent for the first few months, and then deliberately default, all while remaining in occupation without making further payments. Wouter de Swardt (WDS) and Paula Disberry (PD) etc were more than happy to join that chorus,
However, this narrative collapses under scrutiny for two reasons:
-
It was simply untrue, and overlooks the consistent and timely payment history
-
It ignores the deliberate and targeted campaign to destroy the very revenue streams that should have paid the rental accounts.
-
It also ignores the absolute hypocrisy of claiming there were rent arrears, that this was intentional and always part of the plan while at the same time consistently and concertedly doing everything they could to attack the income needed to meet rental commitments
-
And the further deceit, hypocrisy and double standards of taking from us what was the very foundation of the agreement in the first pace, the rental income from letting out the properties, as well as the long term tenure, the combination of the two necessary to repay the enormous investment of time, expertise and money.
-
Added to which the further deceit of claiming publicly they had no knowledge of and given no consent for our renting out the properties to tourists,
_edited.jpg)
THE "INGE" INTERVIEW
[About the insistence she lie about the existence of fraud Int.
We tried blocking his adverts each time we saw any, but he kept creating new ones, said Inge.
THE 100+ ATTACKS BY THE CONSORTIUM
Concerted And Wide Ranging Attacks On Revenue And Person
The attacks on revenue were not random but part of a deliberate, multi-pronged campaign designed to cripple the business and manufacture financial distress.
The coordinated efforts included:
Social Media Smear Campaigns: Fake Instagram profiles were created to mirror the villa names and flood social media with false claims about scams.
Removal of Online Listings (April 2022): In one coordinated strike, landlords collaborated to remove all villa profiles from booking platforms, wiping out the primary source of revenue.
This resulted in the cancellation of bookings worth at least R6 million and forced refunds totaling R2 million.
Repeated Cancellation of Bookings: Guests were frightened off through direct communications, false claims of scams, and targeted misinformation campaigns.
Repeated Illegal Evictions and Property Invasions: Landlords orchestrated multiple illegal attempts to seize properties, sometimes violently, causing operational disruption.
On 24 December 2021, following a completed refurbishment, Keith Broad attempted an eviction despite no rent arrears, costing a month’s revenue due to booking cancellations.
Disruption Through Criminal Charges and Arrests: Arrests were strategically timed to coincide with peak operational periods.
The December 2022 arrest not only disrupted operations but also served as a pretext for landlords to take over properties, preventing access.
Malicious Engagement with Platforms: False claims were made to booking platforms, leading to profiles being removed.
Fabricated allegations, such as the villas being fake or unauthorized, were used to undermine bookings.
Coordinated Media Campaigns: Articles in News24, fed by fabricated claims, sought to destroy reputations and scare potential clients away.
Theft of Critical Assets: Landlords and their agents stole essential documents and assets, including my passport and operational equipment, further hindering the ability to operate and defend against their actions.
Interference with Civil Litigation: While attacking the operational capacity through illegal actions, the landlords simultaneously manipulated the civil court system by presenting fabricated evidence and perjured statements
These attacks were not isolated incidents but a calculated, sustained effort to force financial failure and justify their own illegal actions.
ATTACK'S IMPACT
Projected Versus Actual Bookings Revenue & Assets
This chart lays bare the economic cost of the coordinated attacks by the consortium
-
—a timeline of sabotage that includes illegal arrests,
-
online takedowns,
-
embezzlement,
-
and unlawful evictions,
-
all designed to dismantle operations and seize control.
Each major attack is marked by a sharp decline in revenue, yet what follows each one is even more telling:
a consistent recovery that closely tracks the original revenue trend line, demonstrating both the accuracy of initial projections and the fundamental strength and resilience of the portfolio.
Key events mapped include:
- The post-Omicron rebound, showing exponential growth when operations were under internal control.
- The April 2022 coordinated takedown, wiping out online visibility and costing millions.
key mapped eventgs continued ....
- A series of arrests and detentions, each timed to derail momentum, suppress bookings, and facilitate asset theft.
- Repeated recovery spikes, proving market confidence and operational viability when interference ceased.
The pattern is unmistakable: whenever the business was left unmanipulated, revenue rebounded. This chart is not just financial data—it’s evidence of a systematic campaign to suppress a thriving business, and the undeniable resilience of the work that rebuilt it each time.
The Lies Behind the Arrears Allegations
Landlords’ claims of rent arrears are rooted in hypocrisy and deceit. The same landlords accusing tenants of arrears are the ones who:
-
Sought to destroy revenue streams, knowing these were essential to meet rental obligations.
-
Orchestrated campaigns to undermine the business, while continuing to demand rent.
-
Benefited from significant property improvements that vastly increased the value and rental potential of their villas.
For example, Paula Disberry was instrumental in the April 2022 attacks that wiped out revenue streams but then cited rent arrears as grounds for eviction.
Hypocrisy in the Context of Business Sabotage
The campaign against us demonstrates extreme hypocrisy. Despite relentless sabotage, rent payments continued until the operation was forcibly dismantled. Imagine renting a property from a landlord who:
• Repeatedly sabotages your livelihood.
• Expects you to find alternative revenue streams after each attack.
• Uses your inability to recover as evidence of your supposed untrustworthiness.
This is exactly what happened. Even in the face of these attacks, rent payments continued, proving that the intent was always to honour obligations—not default, as falsely alleged.
It would be akin to a bank approving a loan—with high interest rates and strict repayment terms—only to then deliberately sabotage your ability to repay it. Imagine that bank engaging in multiple actions, many of them illegal, to ensure you lost your job. Each time you found new employment, they intervened to make sure you lost that too. Then, when payments inevitably became late, they imposed penalties and publicly vilified you as a reckless defaulter.
FINANCIAL SABOTAGE, REVENUE DESTRUCTION
Documented targeted financial damage - tracking lost assets, attacks on revenue, and the correlation between orchestrated arrests, court actions, and defamatory media coverage
This evidence-driven financial analysis tracks asset destruction & revenue loss across a plotted timelines, exposing how coordinated legal, criminal, and media actions systematically dismantled projected financial stability.
The figures reveal the direct correlation between SAPS arrests, civil litigation, and Media24 coverage - all strategically aligned with critical financial downturns.
The data indisputably proves that these events were not incidental but a calculated effort to cripple economic viability & destroy legitimate business operations.
Each financial decline is mapped directly to criminal & judicial interference - showing deliberate economic sabotage executed with precision over time!
THE REALITY OF THE RENTAL ACCOUNT
Despite these relentless attacks, rent was paid consistently and on time for nearly two years, from December 2020 through early 2022. The total rent due for the period of occupation was R4,310,853, while the total paid to landlords amounted to R4,453,041, resulting in an overpayment of R142,188.
The April 2022 attacks were the tipping point. With the complete removal of marketing profiles and the cessation of revenue, arrears began to accumulate—but only marginally and only after prolonged and targeted attacks. Even then, the arrears amounted to just a couple of months across all properties before the illegal arrests and evictions terminated operations entirely.
Explanation of the Rental Reconciliation Table
The rental reconciliation table provides a factual breakdown of rent payments, occupation periods, and additional investments, systematically debunking the false claims made by the landlords. It highlights four key elements, exposing the contradictions, hypocrisy, and outright fabrications in their narrative.
Proof That the “Two Months’ Rent” Claim Is a Lie
The table irrefutably disproves the central allegation that I only paid rent for the first couple of months before ceasing payments. It clearly shows 50 months of occupation, with total rent due of R3,938,853.24 and total rent paid of R4,322,053.89—meaning that instead of arrears, there was a surplus of R383,200.65. Rather than paying rent for only a couple of months and then stopping, the table proves that I paid rent consistently for nearly four years, with the total amount paid exceeding what was owed.
This directly contradicts their false claims and exposes the deliberate misrepresentation of the financial reality.
CALCULATED STRATEGY
Every major event in this campaign occurred entirely within two critical timeframes, marked on the chart by the two blue lines.
The sequence of SAPS actions (arrests, detentions), court filings, and media attacks moved in exact alignment with the attempts to unlawfully seize properties under lease agreements. When the final property was forcefully taken back, all activity - 'legal', criminal, and media - immediately ceased.
Proving the campaign was not about justice, but a calculated strategy to unlawfully dispossess tenants under the guise of procedural legitimacy.
EVIDENCE
GRAPHICAL EVIDENCE: PRECISE INEXPLICABLE ALIGNMENT
Coordinated Attacks and Precise Alignment of Civil, Criminal, Illegal Evictions, Docket Activity and Media24's Fabricated Articles
This chart exposes the strategic alignment between civil litigation, criminal charges, illegal evictions, and the timed release of Media24 articles. Every escalation in court was mirrored by a media smear and a new unlawful act—from fabricated arrears claims to manufactured police action.
The overlap is not coincidental. It reveals a deliberate, sustained campaign to discredit, evict, and criminalise me while silencing the evidence of what I uncovered.
The False Claim of “Financial Hardship” on the Landlords
The landlords repeatedly claimed they suffered financial losses due to supposed rent arrears. The reality is the exact opposite. They received more rent than was due, directly benefiting from consistent payments while at the same time orchestrating a campaign to destroy the revenue streams that funded those payments.
They also benefited from millions in property improvements, all paid for by me, and then seized those properties without compensation, inheriting those improvements without ever paying for them. Instead of suffering hardship, the landlords profited significantly while simultaneously trying to paint themselves as victims.
The Myth of “No Consent” for the Business Model
If, as they claim, they had no knowledge of and did not consent to their properties being rented to tourists, how do they explain 50 months of occupation and rental payments?
Nowhere in any contract, letter, email exchange, or legal document is there any reference to me not having permission. On the contrary, multiple conversations and written communications explicitly reference that exact business model. They cannot have it both ways. They cannot claim they were unaware of the operation while simultaneously accepting rent payments every single month for years without objection.
The Extreme Hypocrisy of Their Actions
The landlords agreed to leases that depended on rental income from tourists. They then deliberately and aggressively worked to destroy that income—sabotaging every avenue through which rent could be paid.
Once they had successfully crippled revenue, they took back the properties, eliminating my long-term tenure—the very basis upon which I could recover my investment. At the same time, they publicly framed me as a tenant in arrears, accused me of damaging the properties, and used those false claims to justify their illegal actions.
LOSSES & DAMAGE
Documented Losses: The Price of Corruption & Systemic Misconduct
📌 Total Financial Impact: R227,562,975
✔ Seized assets & blocked funds: R16,000,000+ (Jewelry, bank holdings, safety deposits)
✔ Property losses & stolen rental income: R180,000,000+ (Luxury residences in Llandudno, Hout Bay & Camps Bay)
✔ Legal costs incurred due to wrongful arrests: R3,150,000
✔ Personal losses: R560,000+ (Forced deposits, stolen possessions, and family costs)
📌 How These Losses Were Engineered:
"The consortium of landlords, aided by corrupt police officers and media manipulation, systematically dismantled financial stability by weaponizing legal processes. Properties were unlawfully seized, rental income was hijacked, strategic arrests were timed to remove opposition, and reputational attacks ensured financial ruin."
📌 Significance:
"These figures are not just numbers; they represent a campaign designed to strip assets, obstruct legal defenses, and consolidate control through deception and force."
What the Right Side of the Table Shows: What I Am Owed
This table does more than just disprove the arrears claim—it demonstrates that the landlords owe me millions. Total investments in improvements: R5,200,000.00.
Total furnishings and assets lost: R5,480,000.00. Total wealth transferred from me to them: Over R11 million. This was not a case of rent arrears. This was a calculated, coordinated transfer of wealth.
Conclusion
The table is not just evidence—it is a complete refutation of the landlords’ fabricated claims. Every allegation they made is contradicted by documented transactions, occupation periods, and financial records.
They did not suffer losses.
They did not lack knowledge of the business model.
They were not the victims.
Instead, they engineered a deliberate campaign to extract rent and improvements from me, sabotage the operation, force me out, seize the properties, and walk away with millions in direct financial benefit. This table proves the truth.
VILLAINS & VICTIMS
Exposing the Fabricated Narrative, showing who really lost and won, who lost everything & who cashed in
The brutal financial truth behind the campaign. It ranks every key figure by the financial losses they suffered or gains they enjoyed — starting with myself, who lost over R150 million in income, assets, and opportunity.
It then charts the landlords — Keith Broad, Inge Broad, Paula Disberry, Raj Moonsamy — each of whom reaped enormous financial rewards after breaching their contracts and seizing upgraded properties. Their gains, measured in tens of millions of rand, stand in stark contrast to the fabricated narrative that painted them as victims.
The chart also acknowledges the other casualties of the campaign: staff unlawfully removed, bookings interfered with, and innocent third parties caught in the crossfire. The figures speak for themselves. This was not a case of rogue tenants — it was a coordinated asset grab that created massive winners and devastating losers. And those who screamed ‘victim’ the loudest profited the most.
The Fabricated Narrative of Rent Arrears
The allegation of rent arrears was not only false but strategically employed to divert attention from the landlords’ coordinated sabotage campaign. This is a textbook case of victim-blaming—those responsible for systematically destroying revenue streams and making rent payments impossible then used the resulting arrears as justification for their illegal actions.
For nearly two years, rent was paid in full and on time, even in the face of relentless attacks designed to cripple operations. The only arrears that eventually emerged were a direct consequence of these coordinated efforts to undermine the business and disrupt every revenue source.
The financial records, timelines, and evidence speak for themselves: far from being an errant tenant, I demonstrated exceptional resilience and compliance, maintaining payments until the sabotage campaign escalated to the point where recovery became impossible.
LOSSES & DAMAGE
Stolen Jewelry Collection: Asset Seizures & Luxury Losses
📌 Total Estimated Value: R15,415,200
✔ 22-Carat Untreated Yellow Sapphire Ring – R2,880,000
✔ Boodles Diamond Tennis Bracelet – R672,000
✔ Rolex Gold – R1,820,000
✔ Exclusive Designer Pieces from Cartier, Bulgari & Boodles
📌 Context:
"These items, spanning fine jewelry and rare timepieces, were part of a meticulously curated collection—confiscated and never returned."
📌 Significance:
"The loss isn’t just financial; it represents a deliberate attempt to erase assets, obstruct legal defenses, and inflict reputational harm.
IMPACT, DAMAGE, LOSSES & BLOCKED ABILITY TO REPORT CRIMES INCLUDING THEFT
How Unlawful Evictions & Corrupt Interference Led to Stolen Properties, Revenue & Personal Assets
Keith Broad’s Misrepresentation to the Courts & Recycling of False Evidence
This table reveals how every case cited in Keith Broad’s December application originates from the same small group of individuals, proving that:
✔ Keith Broad falsely presented these cases as separate, independent, and unrelated, despite all originating from the same consortium members—himself and Paula Disberry.
✔ Several cases were listed twice, artificially inflating the number of allegations.
✔ Many cases had already been thrown out by the prosecution, yet were deliberately included to mislead the courts.
✔ Media24 selectively reported only damaging claims, ignoring counter-evidence and case dismissals.
✔ The timing of the application was deliberate, ensuring Darren Russell was incarcerated and unable to challenge the false claims.
✔ The dossier compiled by Wouter de Swardt served as the foundation for these cases, laundering fabricated claims through multiple channels to create the illusion of independent corroboration.
This table exposes the deception behind the legal attacks, proving that the cases were not independently verified—but systematically engineered to remove opposition and seize control of assets.
The Overarching Truth
The landlords’ narrative of arrears is a fabrication, designed to justify their own illegal actions and obscure the truth of their malicious campaign. Their claims conveniently ignore the fact that rent was consistently paid for nearly two years—despite their concerted efforts to destroy the very revenue streams from which rent was funded.
Rather than a tenant in arrears, the reality is the opposite: I showed extraordinary commitment to honoring my obligations despite relentless attacks. The hypocrisy is undeniable—those who went to extreme lengths to sabotage revenue later weaponized the financial impact of their own actions.
Their story collapses under the weight of evidence, exposing what this really was: a calculated effort to force me out by any means necessary, regardless of facts, fairness, or legality.
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: Arrests Charges, Media24, Civil Court Dates, Illegal & The Three Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign. The start and end of the series of articles aligning precisely wit the star and finish of the Wouter de Swardt's role in the campaign and likewise the start and finish of the property grabs.
300+ CRIMINAL OFFENCES
Criminal Offences Committed Against Darren Russell by SAPS Officers and Consortium Members (2022-2023)
This evidence table documents more than 300 distinct criminal actions. Each entry references a specific offence, including unlawful arrest, obstruction of justice, malicious prosecution, evidence tampering, media manipulation, and conspiracy to defeat the ends of justice.
This is not an exhaustive list — but the detail and scale are enough to establish the pattern of systemic, organised criminal conduct. All listed actions are either criminal under South African law or constitute direct abuse of process, and many have been repeated across multiple fabricated charges.
THE PROPERTIES INDIVIDUALLY
12 Hove Road “Hove Heaven”
Despite the challenges of the Omicron variant and the relentless attacks by the landlords, no rent arrears were recorded until after they completely removed all marketing. The narrative spun by Paula Disberry is both false and intentionally misleading.
For nearly a year and a half, rent was paid in full and on time, with the sole exception of a minor delay in June 2021, when payment was a week late. Over this period, I paid more than R2 million in rent and utilities, maintaining consistent and reliable payments.
However, June 2021 marked the beginning of illegal eviction attempts by Paula Disberry and Peter Van Wyk. Just seven days after rent had been paid, they launched their first illegal eviction attempt. Paula Disberry later played a direct role in my August arrest and even attempted to sabotage my bail application by submitting a false affidavit, further exposing her calculated interference.
By mid-2022, the relentless attacks, SAPS involvement, and constant undermining of my business operations had taken their toll. After my traumatic experience in Pollsmoor and seeing the extent to which the landlords were willing to go, I sought a settlement to end the hostilities. A full and final agreement was reached, under which I relinquished my rights to the property in exchange for the cessation of attacks.
Despite this, Paula Disberry benefited immensely from my tenancy. The property, which had struggled to find a tenant, was significantly improved, and rent was consistently paid until the April 2022 attacks—attacks in which she played a key role. These attacks decimated the operation, leading to temporary arrears—but even those arrears were far outweighed by the improvements left behind.
PERJURY & OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
The Fabricated Case List: How Every Legal Action in the December Application Traces Back to the Same People
Keith Broad’s Misrepresentation to the Courts & Recycling of False Evidence
This table reveals how every case cited in Keith Broad’s December application originates from the same small group of individuals, proving that:
✔ Keith Broad falsely presented these cases as separate, independent, and unrelated, despite all originating from the same consortium members—himself and Paula Disberry.
✔ Several cases were listed twice, artificially inflating the number of allegations.
✔ Many cases had already been thrown out by the prosecution, yet were deliberately included to mislead the courts.
✔ Media24 selectively reported only damaging claims, ignoring counter-evidence and case dismissals.
✔ The timing of the application was deliberate, ensuring Darren Russell was incarcerated and unable to challenge the false claims.
✔ The dossier compiled by Wouter de Swardt served as the foundation for these cases, laundering fabricated claims through multiple channels to create the illusion of independent corroboration.
This table exposes the deception behind the legal attacks, proving that the cases were not independently verified—but systematically engineered to remove opposition and seize control of assets.
32 Fisherman’s Bend, “Llandudno Legend”
The allegations of rent arrears for Fisherman’s Bend are equally baseless. Rent was consistently paid throughout the year, culminating in a December 2023 payment of R250,000—the equivalent of 2.5 months’ rent. This payment was made with the commitment to complete the remainder of the upcoming year within a week.
The timing of the arrests orchestrated by Monosemy and Broad was not coincidental. These arrests deliberately coincided with critical payment periods, ensuring maximum disruption to operations and facilitating the illegal takeover of the property.
Moreover, the property was vacated prematurely due to the arrests, meaning half of December’s rent—already paid in advance—was never utilized. This further highlights the deceit of the landlords’ narrative, as the rent account remained in good standing until their illegal actions forcibly ended the tenancy.
UNLAWFUL DETENTIONS
100% LEGAL VICTORIES, NOT ONE REPORTED BY MEDIA24
A table documenting the outcomes of every civil & criminal case, proving my position was substantiated, the opposing claims dismantled, yet detention was still executed before judgements were known
This table presents irrefutable legal outcomes, proving that every civil & criminal ruling validated my position, while exposing the consortium's claims as baseless and unsubstantiated.
Despite the total collapse of their legal arguments, the premeditated goal was never a courtroom victory - it was detention before rulings emerged, ensuring maximum damage and obstruction of justice.
16 Leirmans Road, “Llandudno Luxe”
Rent for Leirmans Street was paid in full and on time, with payments made quarterly in advance. Yet, despite this impeccable payment record, landlords Keith and Inge Broad perpetuated false claims of arrears to justify their illegal actions.
The reality tells a far different story. Not only was rent consistently paid, but utility bills were also settled in full—even when the landlords themselves failed to pay their municipal obligations. By the time the municipality cut off services due to their non-payment, I had already paid R100,000 toward utilities, forcing them to make a belated payment of R60,000 to restore services.
As the campaign to remove me intensified, I sought assurances from the Broads regarding the safety and security of myself, my staff, and my guests should we continue occupying the property. Their refusal to provide these assurances, combined with escalating illegal actions, made continued occupation untenable.
The situation further deteriorated with illegal evictions, arrests, and interference with bail applications. Despite a brief return to the property in November, during which I spent R50,000 to restore it after damage caused by Broad’s hired thugs, the property was again seized through illegal means in December. This entire saga exposes the landlords’ malicious intent and the complete fabrication of rent arrears allegations.
THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT: MEDIA24'S FABRICATED ARTICLES & THE CONSORTIUMS CAMPAIGN
The unmistakable and precise alignment between the publication of the articles by Media24, and the campaign by the consortium.
As aligned as the specific timing of the articles was the start and finish of the series of articles. Starting when needed and ending when the goals had been achieved.
MEDIA24'S DEFAMATORY CAMPAIGN
Media24’s Defamation Campaign: A Coordinated Effort to Control the Narrative
This table exposes an indisputable pattern—a deliberate and sustained defamation campaign by Media24 across multiple major South African media titles.
The repetition and cross-publication of defamatory articles reinforce that this was not isolated reporting but a strategically executed campaign designed to spread and maintain a false narrative. Each article was published across multiple outlets, ensuring that misinformation reached the widest possible audience.
Despite detailed, evidence-based rebuttals demonstrating the articles were false, Media24:
-
Refused to retract, correct, or acknowledge their errors.
-
Dismissed legitimate challenges with lies and deflection.
-
Never removed the articles, leaving the damage as severe today as when first published—or worse, as time amplifies the harm.
The timing of publication further proves deliberate orchestration. Articles were released only when the consortium's campaign was in full force—aligning directly with strategic legal maneuvers designed to obstruct justice. When events turned in favor of the truth, Media24 ceased coverage entirely.
Through this selective, one-sided reporting, Media24 chose their beginning, manipulated the middle, and erased the end, ensuring that the only narrative that remained was the one that served their agenda.
7 Monterey Road “Hout Bay Hamptons”, ”Little Hamptons”
The two properties on Monterey Road followed the same pattern of relentless attacks and false arrears allegations. Rent arrears only emerged after the coordinated removal of all marketing platforms, which decimated revenue and resulted in dozens of booking cancellations.
As revenue dried up, I sought assurances from the landlords that if arrears were fully paid, I would be allowed to remain safely and securely in the property. These assurances were never provided, and the attacks continued unabated.
While I was detained in Pollsmoor, the landlords seized the opportunity to take back control of the properties. When it became clear that I was going to secure bail, they immediately changed all the locks, ensuring that I would have no ability to return—despite this violating both legal and ethical standards.
CORRUPT MANEUVERS
KEITH BROAD'S APPLICATION SUBMITTED 13 DECEMBER 2022 & SERG STEVENS SEIZURE WARRANT SUBMITTED 13 DECEMBER 2022
On December 13, 2022, two legal actions unfolded in perfect synchrony: Keith Broad submitted his appeal against the November court ruling, while Serg Stevens applied for a seizure warrant that would prevent any defense against that appeal.
The warrant was not only timed to coincide with the application but was illegally used to confiscate critical equipment and ensure absence by illegally arresting me - an absence that was necessary for Keith Broad to secure a favourable ruling. The evidence exposes a deliberate obstruction tactic. where 'legal' mechanisms were weaponized to eliminate opposition and manipulate judicial process.
PERJURY, ONE EXAMPLE OF MANY
One of Dozens Of Examples of Keith Broad's Perjury & Contempt of Court
Absolute, categorical and irrefutable proof of very significant perjury. A black and white example, one of many, of Keith Broad's tactics, character, methods and lies. Signed, sealed ad submitted to the courts
Every single application Keith Broad submitted was a masterclass in both perjury and deception. He knew no judge would grant an eviction order against a tenant who was up to date with their rent, had conducted themselves perfectly and who had spent a fortune on the property.
It was therefore essential Keith Broad lie to achieve that goal, which then made it essential to remove the opposition and destroy the ability to attend and defend.
Their Own Accusations Expose Them
If, as they claim, the income I received from renting out the properties was the proceeds of fraud, scams, and criminal enterprises, then what they are also admitting is that they knowingly accepted money obtained through alleged criminal activity. It is a crime to knowingly accept payments that are the proceeds of illegal activity.
Yet they accepted those payments month after month after month—never once returning any of it, never once handing it over to the police or supposed victims. Instead, they enriched themselves with what they now claim was fraudulently obtained money.
This alone exposes the dishonesty of their claims. They either knowingly accepted money they now claim was criminal, or their accusations are false. Whichever way you look at it, their entire narrative collapses.
Criminal Offences Committed by Knowingly Receiving Stolen Money in South Africa
In South African law, knowingly receiving stolen money or money obtained through criminal activities falls under several criminal offences.
Money laundering under the Prevention of Organised Crime Act (POCA) 1998 makes it a criminal offence to receive, possess, use, or deal with property, including money, while knowing or reasonably suspecting that it is the proceeds of unlawful activities. Under Section 4 of POCA, the penalty can be up to 30 years’ imprisonment or a fine of up to R100 million.
Receiving stolen property is a crime under both common law and the Criminal Procedure Act. A person who knowingly receives stolen property is guilty of receiving stolen goods, and the punishment is equivalent to the original theft offence. This means that if the money was stolen, the receiver is treated as if they committed the theft themselves.
Fraud under common law applies if the recipient of the money knew it was illegally obtained and still accepted it. They could be guilty of fraud for misrepresenting their right to possess and use the funds. The penalty for fraud in South Africa can be up to 25 years’ imprisonment, depending on the amount involved.
The Financial Intelligence Centre Act (FICA) makes it a criminal offence to knowingly receive and use large sums of money that come from criminal sources without reporting it. Failure to report suspicious transactions under FICA is punishable by fines of up to R100 million or imprisonment of up to 15 years.
The Proceeds of Crime provisions under POCA make it an offence to knowingly benefit from money obtained through unlawful means, even if the recipient did not commit the original crime. Those convicted can face asset confiscation, long-term imprisonment, and significant fines.
If the landlords truly believed that the rent payments they received were from criminal activity, then they were legally obligated to report it to law enforcement. Failure to do so is itself a crime under POCA & FICA.
By knowingly accepting the money and using it for their own benefit, they committed money laundering under POCA. If they later falsely claimed to authorities that the payments were criminal proceeds while having already benefited from them, they may also be guilty of fraud.
If their accusations were true, they knowingly participated in a serious criminal offence and could face severe legal consequences.
EVIDENCE
GRAPHICAL EVIDENCE: PRECISE INEXPLICABLE ALIGNMENT
Coordinated Attacks and Precise Alignment of Civil, Criminal, Illegal Evictions, Docket Activity and Media24's Fabricated Articles
This chart exposes the strategic alignment between civil litigation, criminal charges, illegal evictions, and the timed release of Media24 articles. Every escalation in court was mirrored by a media smear and a new unlawful act—from fabricated arrears claims to manufactured police action.
The overlap is not coincidental. It reveals a deliberate, sustained campaign to discredit, evict, and criminalise me while silencing the evidence of what I uncovered.
THE MOST INVESTIGATED PERSON - AND YET NO EVIDENCE EXISTS
Systemic Investigations, Fabricated Narratives, and Zero Credible Proof
Despite two and a half years of investigations by more than 70 individuals and organizations, no credible evidence has been found to support the allegations against me.
These investigations included unrestricted access to financial records, business transactions, private correspondence, court proceedings, and seized devices—yet every legal, financial, and institutional review cleared me completely.
The only “evidence” presented has either originated from the consortium itself, been manipulated, or been outright fabricated.
ARREST AND DETENTION FOR STRATEGIC ADVANTAGE
The Fabricated Case List: How Every Legal Action in the December Application Traces Back to the Same People
Keith Broad’s Misrepresentation to the Courts & Recycling of False Evidence
This table reveals how every case cited in Keith Broad’s December application originates from the same small group of individuals, proving that:
✔ Keith Broad falsely presented these cases as separate, independent, and unrelated, despite all originating from the same consortium members—himself and Paula Disberry.
✔ Several cases were listed twice, artificially inflating the number of allegations.
✔ Many cases had already been thrown out by the prosecution, yet were deliberately included to mislead the courts.
✔ Media24 selectively reported only damaging claims, ignoring counter-evidence and case dismissals.
✔ The timing of the application was deliberate, ensuring Darren Russell was incarcerated and unable to challenge the false claims.
✔ The dossier compiled by Wouter de Swardt served as the foundation for these cases, laundering fabricated claims through multiple channels to create the illusion of independent corroboration.
This table exposes the deception behind the legal attacks, proving that the cases were not independently verified—but systematically engineered to remove opposition and seize control of assets.
AUGUST CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
AUGUST CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
AUGUST CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
1) The spoliatio application was submitted on 26 July, KB notified 28 July
2) The date of the hearing was 4 August,
3) KB / IB lay the false theft charges and obtain P.O 29 July-1 Aug
4) Concerted moves to arrest begin immediately (by fluke i was in Pringle Bay) and continue through to morning of 4 August
5) Arrest executed 8am 4 August, too late to stop the proceedings
DECEMBER CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
1) An appeal to the November ruling was required between 6 and 16 December. The seizure warrant was applied for on 13 December. The same day Keith Broad filed his court application.
2) Two magistrates declined to authorise either an arrest warrant or a search and seizure warrant.
3) The seizure warrant obtained internally on the false premise of urgency at 8am on 14 Dec
3) Arrest made 10am.
4) application pushed through by K Broad while I was detained
MARCH CHARGES PRECISE TIMING
1) KB attempts to have the hearing while I am detained.
2) Heating date put back twice, so Serg Stevens continues to demand more time for "further investigation"
3) Final date is set at 15 March with my bail application due to stat 14 March
4) Prosecution drop all charges on first sight, to ensure i remained on remand Serg Stevens introduces a new charge, this time the bogus immigration charge to ensure my absense for the hearing .
IMPOSSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
The table demonstrates the impossibility of coincidence with all three sets of charges coming literally to the day when needed to provide a strategic advantage in the three most significant court dates of the entire relationship.
Court dates where my absence would be essential.
A relationship that spanned a year and a half and if the charges were genuine a period of four years
"History is filled with those who stole under the banner of justice" - George Orwell