KEITH BROAD AND INGE BROAD'S VIOLENT HOME INVASION & THEIR MANY ILLEGAL EVICTIONS
Introduction
There has never been a period since the transformation of the property was completed that was free from conflict involving Keith and Inge Broad. The attempts to reclaim the property began just two days after the refurbishment was finished and have continued unabated.
The campaign against me started with illegal physical evictions carried out by Keith but escalated far beyond that. Keith and Inge made repeated attempts to unilaterally cancel the lease, treating it as if it were a casual, revocable arrangement—akin to cancelling a dinner reservation. Their expectation was that I would simply comply, hand over the keys, and vacate the premises without question.
Harassment was relentless. They demanded increasing sums of money, often through fabricated charges. Extortion, threats, and intimidation became routine. Their conduct was marked by aggressive behaviour, abuse, and foul language, with the clear intent to pressure me into submission.
Their financial manipulation was blatant. Keith and Inge demanded payment of bills earlier and earlier, reducing standard payment terms to a matter of hours. Typically, utility invoices issued by the agent carried strict seven-day payment terms, or, at the very least, standard deadlines of fourteen to twenty-eight days. However, Keith and Inge dismissed these terms entirely, treating invoices issued mere hours prior as "arrears" and using them as an excuse for further aggression and harassment.
The most egregious aspect of their demands, however, was the fraudulent nature of the charges. In many instances, we were invoiced for utilities and other expenses before the billing period had even commenced or long before they were legally due.
At the time, we were unaware of the full scale of their deception. It was only later that we discovered none of the money we had paid them for utilities—totalling over one million rand—had been forwarded to the municipality. The result was devastating in April 2022, our electricity was cut off. By that stage, we had already paid every invoice issued, yet none of those payments had reached the intended recipients. The screaming, threats, and pressure to pay earlier and earlier had been nothing more than a calculated ploy to extract and pocket the money.
VIDEO EVIDENCE
Keith Broad’s Home Invasion: A Premeditated Attack Including Threats, Forced Entry, and the Violent Attempt to Seize the Property
The video provides undeniable visual proof of Keith Broad’s premeditated and unlawful attack, revealing his deliberate disregard for legal protections, tenant rights, and due process.
Captured in real time, the footage exposes forced entry, threats, and physical aggression, documenting his attempt to seize the property without legal authority.
His shifting explanations and outright lies contradict the indisputable evidence visible in the recording.
This video stands as critical evidence of the illegal eviction attempt and reinforces the broader pattern of abuse and criminal misconduct.
The Guests and Keith’s Plan
On 27 February 2022, a family from Germany—a mother, father, and their infant child—arrived for their 16-day holiday, which had been booked well in advance. Keith was fully aware of their reservation, having been informed by Willem, the housekeeper, who was not only complicit in the evictions but actively engaged as Keith’s informant and enforcer.
Just before their arrival, Keith gave explicit instructions to Willem to lock and secure the property, denying access not just to me and my staff but also to the guests themselves.
The scene that unfolded was appalling. The guests, initially confused, soon became frantic. The mother stood on the doorstep in tears, holding her baby, unable to comprehend how they had been locked out of their paid accommodation. Keith, however, remained unmoved. He flatly refused to open the property, showing no concern for the distress he had caused.
It was only when both my attorney and the rental agent intervened—making it clear that we would take immediate legal action—that Keith begrudgingly agreed to unlock the premises. His decision had nothing to do with remorse or ethical obligation; it was a cold calculation. WhatsApp messages he later sent attempted to portray his compliance as an act of kindness, but the reality was clear—he opened the property because he feared the legal and financial consequences of a high court recovery action.
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB1-8/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
On 1 March 2023, Keith and Inge Broad forced their way into my home — without a court order, without a warrant, and without any legal authority whatsoever. I told them clearly and repeatedly that they had no right to enter, but they pushed their way in anyway, barging through the gate and into the house.
This was not a misunderstanding. It was a calculated act of criminal trespass — a deliberate attempt to intimidate me and unlawfully seize the property.
It formed part of their ongoing campaign of harassment, defamation, and asset theft. What you're seeing in these videos is a home invasion, carried out in broad daylight by individuals who believed they were above the law — and who acted with total impunity.
TRANSCRIPT DOCUMENT
Keith Broad’s Home Invasion: A Premeditated Attack Including Threats, Forced Entry, and the Violent Attempt to Seize the Property
This transcript captures the full-scale aggression of Keith Broad’s illegal home invasion, where he kicked down the front door, issued explicit threats of violence, and attempted to forcibly remove the legal tenant without any legal authority.
The exchange reveals his complete disregard for lease agreements, eviction laws, and tenant rights, proving that this was not a dispute—but a violent takeover attempt.
The transcript exposes his false claims, shifting excuses, and outright lies, all designed to justify his unlawful actions.
Guest Refund
The guests were so traumatized by the experience that, by the second day of their stay, they contacted their rental agent and requested to be moved to another villa. They had no confidence in the property after what had transpired. It was impossible for them to relax, enjoy their holiday, or move past the ordeal, knowing that they had been locked out upon arrival while Willem, the housekeeper, stood by indifferent and unmoved as the wife sobbed, holding her infant child. Willem outright refused to open the property unless Keith personally instructed him to do so.
Legally, we were under no obligation to agree to a cancellation and refund. The disastrous experience was in no way our fault. However, the situation had been so disturbing and unacceptable that we made the decision to refund the guests in full.
This was a significant financial loss. Instead of receiving income for the full two-week booking, we incurred a substantial deficit. The impact went beyond just that one reservation—Keith’s previous illegal evictions had already damaged our business. Guests booked to stay in the weeks and months that followed cancelled or were unable to book with confidence. We were forced to leave gaps in our booking schedule, creating buffers to prepare for the next unlawful eviction attempt.
The cumulative financial loss over the next several months amounted to hundreds of thousands of rand. Keith refunded nothing. Even in cases where we had paid rent and utilities upfront for weeks or months in advance, no reimbursement was ever considered. The notion that we should be refunded for the period in February 2022, when we were denied access to our own property, was entirely rejected by Keith.
Keith’s deception did not stop there. He later went on to exploit the guests’ distress for his own benefit, spreading false claims among neighbours and Llandudno residents. He falsely alleged that the crying woman with her baby outside the property was the victim of one of my so-called “scams” and that she had arrived only to be told she had no booking. This outright fabrication was an attempt to manipulate public perception, deliberately omitting that the guests had been unlawfully locked out under Keith’s direct orders.
This pattern of behaviour was not isolated or accidental—it was a calculated tactic. Keith and Inge repeatedly created real victims, showing no concern for the suffering they caused. Their only objective was to push their unlawful agenda forward, regardless of the human and financial cost.
VIDEO RECORDING
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion Keith & Inge Broad – Illegal Home Invasion (1 March)
On 1 March 2023, Keith and Inge Broad forced their way into my home — without a court order, without a warrant, and without any legal authority whatsoever. I told them clearly and repeatedly that they had no right to enter, but they pushed their way in anyway, barging through the gate and into the house.
This was not a misunderstanding. It was a calculated act of criminal trespass — a deliberate attempt to intimidate me and unlawfully seize the property. It formed part of their ongoing campaign of harassment, defamation, and asset theft. What you're seeing in these videos is a home invasion, carried out in broad daylight by individuals who believed they were above the law — and who acted with total impunity.
KEITH BROADS PERJURY, HIS APPLICATION IN DEFENCE OF THE PROTECTION ORDER
"I did not kick the door in, I pushed it lightly and it fell open"
KEITH BROAD'S DENIAL HE KICKED THE DOOR IN
Keith's Plan
Keith’s own WhatsApp messages made his intentions explicit—as soon as the guests’ two-week booking ended, he intended to take over the property and deny us occupation once again. This time, it was likely to be permanent.
We recognized the immediate risk and made the strategic decision not to inform Keith or Willem of the cancellation and refund. This ensured that we were in legal occupation at the time of checkout, securing our leasehold rights. Had we vacated and allowed Keith to seize possession, the only way to recover the property would have been through an expensive and time-consuming legal action. However, by remaining in rightful occupation, the legal burden shifted to Keith—he would have to initiate legal proceedings to remove us, an application that was guaranteed to fail.
By this point, we had already paid the rent for the entire quarter—January, February, and March. Not only were we fully up to date, but in most cases, we had been paying two to three months ahead. Yet, none of this mattered to Keith.
Keith’s tactics remained the same—every illegal eviction attempt, every act of aggression, every baseless demand was carried out regardless of whether rent had been paid in full. He manufactured excuses to justify his unlawful conduct, falsely claiming arrears or fabricating grievances to serve as a pretext for his actions.
By the time he executed his July 2022 evictions, we had already paid Keith over R1,000,000 in rent and utilities—money that was supposed to cover lawful occupation but was instead pocketed while he continued his campaign to unlawfully remove us. On top of this, we had invested double that amount into transforming the property. None of it mattered.
Keith’s conduct was never about arrears, contractual disputes, or legal obligations. It was about one thing only—forcibly seizing control of a property he had no right to reclaim.
Keith’s Housekeeper: A Willing Accomplice in Illegal Evictions and Fraud
From the moment of the first illegal eviction, I made it clear to Willem, the housekeeper, that if he continued to participate in Keith’s unlawful actions, his position would become untenable.
I repeated this warning after the second illegal eviction. And again, after the third.
After this latest incident, there was no conceivable way he could remain employed. Willem was no longer just an employee—he had actively assisted Keit
VIDEO EVIDENCE
Keith Broad’s Home Invasion: A Premeditated Attack Including Threats, Forced Entry, and the Violent Attempt to Seize the Property
The video provides undeniable visual proof of Keith Broad’s premeditated and unlawful attack, revealing his deliberate disregard for legal protections, tenant rights, and due process.
Captured in real time, the footage exposes forced entry, threats, and physical aggression, documenting his attempt to seize the property without legal authority.
His shifting explanations and outright lies contradict the indisputable evidence visible in the recording.
This video stands as critical evidence of the illegal eviction attempt and reinforces the broader pattern of abuse and criminal misconduct.
Wellem's Role As Keith's Spy
It was uncovered early in our occupation that Willem had been spying on us for Keith. Within just two months, he was caught sending daily updates to Keith, including photographs of the work being done on the property.
When confronted, Willem admitted to sending these reports almost daily, detailing every stage of the transformation process. This revelation was crucial for several reasons:
Extreme Breach of Privacy and Legality – Engaging in unauthorized surveillance of a tenant’s activities, particularly in a private residence, is an unlawful and extreme invasion of privacy.
Keith’s Involvement and Monitoring – The claim that Keith was unaware of the works or that they had been conducted without permission was completely false. The detailed, ongoing updates he received, complete with photographic evidence, demonstrated that he was not only aware but closely monitoring the improvements being made to his property.
Undermining Keith’s False Claims – Keith would later falsely assert that he had no knowledge that any work was being done, alleging instead that the property was being damaged. This claim was categorically false—his own housekeeper was providing him with near-daily photographic updates. The very premise that I had been induced into the lease to renovate and upgrade the property was a core part of our agreement, yet Keith would later try to deny it outright.
Keith’s hypocrisy was blatant—he accepted and monitored the renovations, then later pretended ignorance to justify his unlawful actions.
KEITH BROAD & INGE BROAD - HOME INVASION
KB: That’s what you think my friend
DR I have lease agreement
KB: YOU HAVE GOT FUCK ALL LEASE
DR I have a lease agreement
KB: READ IT TO ME
KB: YOU DON’T HAVE A FUCKING LEASE
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB02/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
On 1 March 2023, Keith Broad kicked in the front door and stormed into the property — screaming, swearing, and threatening to drag me out.
I repeatedly told him he had no right to enter, but he forced his way in anyway, shouting “you have no f*ing lease” and calling me a ct.
This was not a misunderstanding. It was a violent and deliberate home invasion — part of a broader campaign of defamation, threats, and criminal intent. What you’re seeing is the moment the mask came off — and Media24 chose to protect the man behind it.
The Housekeeper’s Role in Financial Fraud
Beyond acting as Keith’s informant, Willem was also directly involved in fraudulent financial schemes against us. One of the earliest renovation projects we undertook was a full redecoration of the property—inside and out.
During discussions, Willem claimed to know reliable decorators who could do the work at a reasonable rate. He quoted a daily rate for the workers, which seemed fair at the time. However, once the project began, the following red flags emerged:
-
The initial estimate of one to two weeks for completion quickly disappeared, with progress slowing to a crawl.
-
The number of workers on-site fluctuated wildly, with an unreasonably high number of men arriving at times, driving up the costs.
-
Work was being deliberately delayed, stretching out far beyond what was originally agreed.
-
The full extent of the fraud only became clear when one of the decorators, unaware of the scam, questioned the amount they were actually being paid.
What we uncovered was outrageous:
The workers were receiving only half of what we had been told was their daily wage.
The remaining money was being pocketed by Willem—most likely with Keith’s knowledge.
Had this scam gone undetected, it would have resulted in Willem and Keith siphoning off at least R30,000 in stolen wages.
Keith’s Protection of Willem and Refusal to Act
When we discovered the deception, we immediately raised the issue with Keith. Under normal circumstances, a housekeeper caught engaging in fraud and illegal surveillance would be dismissed immediately, and police action would be warranted.
However, Keith did nothing.
Instead of addressing the serious breach of trust, privacy, and financial misconduct, Keith:
-
Stalled and delayed any action, repeatedly claiming he would "look into it."
-
Refused to discipline or dismiss Willem, despite overwhelming evidence of his dishonest and unlawful behaviour.
-
Allowed Willem to continue working at the property, knowing full well that he had engaged in fraud and illegal surveillance on his behalf.
This was not an isolated incident—it was part of a pattern. Keith had no interest in acting against Willem because Willem was too useful as a tool in his ongoing campaign of illegal evictions and harassment.
KEITH BROAD & INGE BROAD - HOME INVASION
KB: OF COURSE YOU CAN YOU CUNT. YOU BROKE, YOU BROKE HALF HE FUCKING HOUSE DOWN.
DR Yeah. It looks like I broke the house down
KB: YES YOU HAVE. I'LL FUCKING DRAG.
KB: FUCKING IDIOT. ….YOU YOU CUNT
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB03/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
In this clip, Keith Broad claims I’m the one who needs a court order — while telling me he doesn’t. He insists he can physically remove me because he’s “cancelled” the lease by letter.
This is not just wrong — it’s unlawful. You can’t evict a tenant with a lawyer’s letter. You can’t cancel a lease by force. What you’re watching here is not confusion over legalities — it’s calculated intimidation from someone who believed he could bypass the law entirely.
And Media24 rewarded him for it. Not once did their coverage address this footage or question the legality of his claims.
Keith's Attack
By the time the guests checked out, I had already moved back into the property. We immediately began cleaning, repairing damage, and securing the premises. One of the most critical actions was changing the locks—we knew that Willem still had a set of keys and would refuse to return them, leaving us vulnerable to an attack at any time.
Willem returned from his day working at Keith’s house earlier than expected. I took him aside and, in calm and professional terms, reiterated what I had told him before: his employment at the property could no longer continue. His continued presence created an unacceptable risk, as one phone call from Keith could lead to another illegal eviction.
Willem was not surprised. He did not argue. He began packing his belongings.
However, as he was gathering his things, one of my staff overheard him calling Keith. At that moment, we knew trouble was coming.
Keith’s Arrival: Violence and Threats
Keith arrived at the property shortly, thereafter, accompanied by:
-
Bobby Broad (Keith’s relative, Gail’s husband).
-
An unidentified third man.
I was informed that they were carrying baseball bats. I did not see them myself—I was too focused on Keith, who kicked the front door in with such force that it splintered into two pieces.
The altercation escalated immediately. The video and transcript evidence leave no doubt about the aggression, the threats, and Keith’s attempt to violently seize the property.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: That’s what you think, my friend.
DR: I have a lease agreement.
KB: YOU HAVE GOT FUCK ALL LEASE.
DR: I have a lease agreement.
KB: READ IT TO ME.
KB: YOU DON’T HAVE A FUCKING LEASE.
DR: Sorry, I have a copy on my laptop.
KB: GO AND GET IT.
KB: GO AND FUCKING GET IT.
KB: AND GET THE FUCKING LAWYER'S LETTER THAT YOU WERE SENT TWO WEEKS AGO EVICTING YOU.
DR: You can’t evict me, you moron, with a letter.
KB: OF COURSE YOU CAN, YOU CUNT. YOU BROKE HALF THE FUCKING HOUSE DOWN.
DR: Yeah? It looks like I broke the house down?
KB: YES, YOU HAVE. I’LL FUCKING DRAG YOU OUT.
KB: FUCKING IDIOT. YOU'VE DONE THIS. NOT ONE PERSON. WE FUCKING FOUND OUT. EVERYONE IS LOOKING FOR YOU, YOUR CUNT.
KB: YOU’RE GOING TO GO TO JAIL.
The level of aggression in this exchange speaks for itself. This was not a landlord-tenant dispute—this was a violent home invasion.
Video Evidence and Transcripts
The video footage of the incident is indisputable. It clearly shows Keith’s aggression, as well as the force used to break the door.
Later, in formal court applications and sworn affidavits, Keith falsely claimed that when he arrived at the property:
-
The door was already slightly ajar.
-
He simply gave it a light push.
-
It fell open on its own.
This was a blatant lie. The sheer force required to smash the door into pieces is evident from the photographs and video footage.
KEITH BROAD & INGE BROAD - HOME INVASION
POLICE: Um, what did you say? From 2021?
DR From October 21, October,
POLICE: It says here the lease period will be a fixed period of 24 months, then 24 months and
KB: His lease is terminated because he broke through walls.
DR It is not terminated. You can't just write a letter,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
KB: It is
DR It is not terminated. You can't write a letter in terminated lease.
KB: The FUCKING lawyers did it man
KB: The lawyers. Are you mad.
KB: You shouldn’t even FUCKING be here
POLICE: So it says here the lease period, fixed period for 24
DR 24 months , then 24 months then 12
POLICE: 24 months , then 24 months then 12
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB04/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
This video captures Keith Broad mid-rant, screaming again that I have “no lease” and “no right” to be there — despite being fully paid up and legally in occupation. He had no court order. No authority. Just rage, threats, and violence.
This wasn't about missed rent — it was about seizing control through force.
Once again, Media24 ignored the video and printed lies instead — painting me as the trespasser and Keith as the victim. Watch this and decide for yourself. They flipped the roles entirely — quoting Keith’s version while omitting the documented facts.
False Claims in Court Documents
Keith repeatedly misrepresented what happened in his court documents. Among his most blatant falsehoods:
-
He claimed that he arrived with PPA security to conduct a legal eviction.
-
He implied that I had no right to be there.
-
He suggested that I had been evicted legally weeks earlier.
Reality:
-
It was me and my staff who called PPA security and the police—not Keith.
-
His arrival was completely unlawful.
-
His intention was clear: to forcefully take possession of the property through violence and intimidation.
Had PPA security and the police not been present, there is little doubt that Keith would have followed through on his physical threats. Given the rage, aggression, and presence of weapons, I have no doubt that I would have ended up in ICU—or worse.
Police Response and Keith’s Reaction
Keith repeatedly insisted that the property was his, that I had no right to be there, and that he was going to sleep there that night.
The money I had paid in rent and utilities—over R1,000,000—meant nothing to him. The significant renovations and upgrades I had undertaken—at my own expense—meant nothing to him.
Even when the PPA security team asked to see documentation, the truth became clear:
-
The lease was valid.
-
The rent had been fully paid on time.
-
There was no legal justification for Keith’s actions.
After a prolonged confrontation, Keith was eventually forced to leave—but his demeanour and behaviour showed exactly what his intentions had been.
This was not a negotiation.
This was not an argument over rent.
This was a premeditated attack.
Had there been no security, no police, and no witnesses, the outcome would have been far worse.
KEITH BROAD & INGE BROAD - HOME INVASION
POLICE: So it says here the lease period, fixed period for 24
DR 24 months , then 24 months then 12
POLICE: Yes, 24 months , then 24 months then 12
KB: Get out of the FUCKING house, its my house
DR Nobody's leaving the house
KB: Out of the house
KB: Get out of the FUCKING house, its my house
POLICE: I now I understand,
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB05/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
Keith Broad shouts that I “broke his office” and “destroyed the house” — while we’re standing inside a property I’d fully renovated and paid to transform.
The irony is breath-taking. There was no damage — only value. But Keith knew the truth made his actions worse, so he invented another lie to cover the first. This video shows what he tried to seize: a high-end, meticulously finished villa.
And Media24 helped by erasing that truth from every article they published. They published claims of damage — without ever showing what the space actually looked like.
Keith’s Attack: A Breakdown of the Transcript Evidence
The transcript and video evidence from this incident reveal a disturbing pattern of behaviour—one that combines abuse, physical threats, and outright disregard for tenant rights and legal processes. Below is a structured breakdown of the key themes captured in the transcript excerpts, exposing the true nature of Keith Broad’s unlawful actions.
1. Abusive Behaviour, Name-Calling, and Foul Language
From the moment Keith forced his way in, his aggression was undeniable. He resorted to shouting, swearing, and hurling insults, displaying complete disregard for any form of civil engagement.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: YOU HAVE GOT FUCK ALL LEASE.
KB: YOU DON’T HAVE A FUCKING LEASE.
KB: GO AND FUCKING GET IT.
KB: YOU CUNT. YOU BROKE HALF THE FUCKING HOUSE DOWN.
KB: FUCKING IDIOT. YOU’VE DONE THIS. NOT ONE PERSON. WE FUCKING FOUND OUT. EVERYONE IS LOOKING FOR YOU, YOUR CUNT.
KB: YOU’RE GOING TO GO TO JAIL.
Analysis: Keith’s behaviour was openly aggressive and abusive. This was not an argument between landlord and tenant—this was a violent and unprovoked verbal attack designed to intimidate and threaten. His use of explicit language and personal insults demonstrates a complete loss of control and a clear intent to dominate through intimidation.
WHATSAPP CHAT EXPORT
The Attorney’s Record of Keith & Inge Broad’s Escalating Lies, Criminality and Aggression
This WhatsApp chat export provides a detailed legal record of Keith and Inge Broad’s systematic misconduct, as documented by legal counsel. The exchanges reveal:
✔ The timeline of escalating legal attacks, proving that every move was premeditated and coordinated.
✔ The moment Wouter de Swardt was appointed, marking a significant increase in criminal conduct.
✔ The attorney’s direct involvement in defending against fabricated claims, exposing the false narratives pushed by Keith and Inge.
✔ The legal strategy used to counteract unlawful evictions, fraudulent filings, and procedural manipulation.
These messages obliterate the false claims made by Keith and Inge Broad, proving that their legal manoeuvres were never about justice—but about executing a calculated property takeover.
2. Explicit Threats of Violence
Keith’s threats were not just implied—they were direct, aggressive, and clearly intended to intimidate. Below are the most explicit threats found in the transcripts and evidence.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: I’ll fucking drag you out.
KB: You are going outta here tonight. No, I’m not. Yes, you are. I’ll fucking drag you.
KB: I WILL FUCKING COME THERE AND SMACK YOU.
KB: You shut up. Yes. I want to make you one? No, you won’t. And I’ll smack you as well.
KB: You think you’re tough, eh?
Analysis:
-
These statements remove all doubt—Keith was fully prepared to use violence.
-
The threat to "drag" me out is a direct admission of illegal eviction by force.
-
His repeated use of "fucking" before his threats shows anger and lack of restraint.
-
The "I WILL FUCKING COME THERE AND SMACK YOU" threat suggests his aggression extended beyond just this incident.
This was not a negotiation or dispute—this was an explicit threat of physical harm.
3. Total Disregard for Tenant Rights and Housing Laws
Keith acted as if tenant rights, lease agreements, and legislation like the PIE Act simply did not apply to him. His repeated references to “his house” demonstrate that he viewed the law as irrelevant—in his mind, possession of the title deed meant he could take back the property whenever he wanted.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: THIS IS MY FUCKING HOUSE. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE HERE.
KB: I’M STAYING HERE TONIGHT. YOU CAN LEAVE.
Analysis: Keith’s statements completely ignore the existence of tenant rights, contractual obligations, and legal eviction processes. His personal belief that property ownership overrides all legal frameworks is not only incorrect but legally dangerous—it highlights the extreme entitlement and disregard for the rule of law.
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB05.1/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
In this clip, Keith Broad first tries to convince security that I was in rental arrears — but when pressed, he admits the rent was fully up to date.
Without missing a beat, he pivots to a new claim: that I “broke into the back room,” attempting to justify his unlawful eviction attempt on new grounds.
In reality, I had added an en-suite bathroom to that space — a renovation he himself had suggested. This is how Keith operated: fabricate first, shift the story when challenged.
Media24 never reported these contradictions — they simply repeated his version, even as it changed in real time.
4. The False Belief That a Landlord Can Simply "Cancel" a Lease
One of Keith’s most dangerous and legally incorrect statements was his assertion that he could simply cancel the lease and expect me to leave immediately.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: YOU DON’T HAVE A FUCKING LEASE. IT’S CANCELLED.
KB: READ IT TO ME.
KB: I SENT YOU A LAWYER'S LETTER TWO WEEKS AGO EVICTING YOU.
Analysis: Keith’s understanding of lease agreements and eviction law is either deeply flawed or intentionally misleading.
-
A lease agreement cannot be “cancelled” unilaterally.
-
A letter from a lawyer is NOT an eviction order.
-
Only a court order can legally terminate a tenancy under South African law.
Keith deliberately misrepresented the legal process, attempting to coerce compliance through deception.
5. The Misuse of a Lawyer’s Letter as a Fake Eviction Notice
Keith repeatedly referenced the lawyer’s letter as though it had the same legal standing as a court-ordered eviction.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: AND GET THE FUCKING LAWYERS LETTER THAT YOU WERE SENT TWO WEEKS AGO EVICTING YOU.
Analysis: A lawyer’s letter has NO legal power to evict a tenant. This is one of the most blatant legal manipulations used by landlords to intimidate tenants who may not fully understand their rights.
Under South African law, an eviction requires a formal court application, legal due process, and judicial oversight. Keith’s weaponization of a meaningless letter was a deliberate attempt to bypass legal proceedings.
KEITH BROAD & INGE BROAD - HOME INVASION
DR: So you accept the rent is paid and up to date
KB: Ah
DR: So the rent is paid yes
KB: Ah, Eh? Yes, my rent is paid
DR: So the rent is paid
KB: No., But its got nothing to do with the rent, its nothing to do with the rent
DR: But the rent is paid, you just said
KB: Its got nothing to do with the rent
KB: No, but it's got nothing to.
DR: But the rent is paid
KB: It's got nothing to do with the rent.
DR: Okay.
KB: It's got to do with what you've done to this house.
DR: That's 540,000 in rent.
DR: In six months alone,
DR: Over R120,000 in utilities
WHATSAPP CHAT EXPORT
Conversation With Keith Broad's Agent and Cousin Gail Broad. Gail Broad’s WhatsApp Chat Export: Proof That the Proposal Was Theirs, Not Mine
How Keith and Inge Broad Knew, Approved, and Benefited from the Sub-Rental Mode:
This WhatsApp chat export obliterates the false claims made by Keith and Inge Broad, proving that:
✔ The sub-rental model was their idea, not mine—they introduced and pushed the proposal.
✔ They knew and consented to the property transformation—which they later misrepresented as damage.
✔ They relied on this model to ensure rent payments—contradicting their fabricated arrears claims.
✔ They falsely accused me of double bookings, damage, and misappropriation of stored items—all disproven by their own messages.
The transcript exposes the deception behind their allegations, revealing how they engineered the lease to secure a free refurbishment, only to later weaponize false claims for financial gain.
6. False Claims That I Needed a Court Order, Not Him
Keith twisted legal obligations, falsely claiming that I, not he, needed a court order to remain in the property.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: YOU DON’T HAVE A COURT ORDER. YOU NEED A COURT ORDER TO STAY HERE.
Analysis: This is entirely false. Under PIE Act regulations, the onus is on the landlord to obtain a court order to remove a tenant—not the other way around. Keith’s blatant misrepresentation of legal obligations was intended to intimidate and manipulate.
7. Keith’s Declaration That He Would Be Staying at the Property
Keith acted as if he could unilaterally decide who occupied the property, regardless of the lease agreement or the law.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: I’M STAYING HERE TONIGHT.
KB: YOU CAN LEAVE.
Analysis: This not only disregards tenancy laws but also highlights his real intent—he was not here to negotiate or resolve an issue. He came with a premeditated plan to take control of the property by force.
8. His Shifting Excuses for Eviction
Keith initially told PPA security and the police that this was about rent arrears. When confronted with evidence that all rent and bills had been fully paid, he immediately changed his justification.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: YOU OWE ME RENT. THAT’S WHY YOU NEED TO LEAVE.
DR: No, I don’t. Everything is paid.
KB: YOU DAMAGED MY HOUSE. YOU BROKE HALF OF IT DOWN.
Analysis: This blatant shift in reasoning exposes Keith’s real agenda—he was looking for any excuse to justify illegal eviction.
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB06/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
In this video, Keith screams that the lease was “terminated” by a letter — and insists I had no legal right to remain. But South African law is clear: a lease can’t be cancelled by letter, and eviction requires a court order. What you’re hearing is not legal reasoning — it’s raw aggression backed by false claims.
This was never a contractual misunderstanding — it was a premeditated campaign to steal back the property, aided by lies, intimidation, and media distortion.
Media24 omitted this reality entirely, instead quoting Keith's affidavit as fact.
9. The False Claim That I Had "Broken the House Down"
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: YOU BROKE HALF THE FUCKING HOUSE DOWN.
Analysis: The reality was that I had completely transformed and upgraded the property, with Keith’s full knowledge, encouragement, and approval. His false accusation was purely a tactical move, used only after other excuses had failed.
10. Declaring That I Would "Lose Everything"
This section includes statements where Keith attempts to completely discredit me and assert dominance, suggesting that my future was ruined.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: See it, man, you’re gonna lose everything.
KB: You’re so stupid.
KB: You wouldn’t live for nothing. Six months. This, you live for nothing. That’s why the people walked out. Because you lied to them or you kicked them out. They’re asking me for the fucking money.
Analysis:
Keith was not just trying to evict me—he was trying to destroy me completely. His statements about losing everything and implying that people had turned against me were designed to psychologically intimidate and exert control.
11. Keith’s Hypocrisy: Blaming Me for the Guests Leaving
After forcing the guests into a traumatic experience, Keith later attempted to shift the blame onto me, claiming I was responsible for their early departure.
Transcript Excerpt:
KB: You made them leave. They asked me for the fucking money.
KB: They walked out. They walked out. You kicked them out.
KB: You wouldn’t let them in. You lied to them.
Analysis:
-
The guests did not leave because of me—they left because they were traumatized after being locked out, ignored, and left standing in distress.
-
The housekeeper Willem, who Keith defended, was directly responsible for locking them out and refusing to let them in.
-
Blaming me for their departure is not just false—it’s another manipulation tactic.
Keith’s duplicity is blatant—his own people were responsible for scaring the guests away, yet he attempted to rewrite history to suit his narrative.
Final Analysis: Keith’s Actions Were Not Just Illegal—They Were Premeditated
The transcripts and video footage make it undeniably clear that Keith’s actions were:
✔ Premeditated – He planned this attack, arriving with backup and attempting to forcibly seize the property.
✔ Illegal – Every element of his conduct violated tenancy law, the PIE Act, and criminal statutes.
✔ A Deliberate Manipulation of the Law – His false claims about leases, lawyer’s letters, and court orders were intended to mislead and intimidate.
Keith’s own words condemn him.
KEITH BROAD & INGE BROAD - HOME INVASION
IB Your not going to get anywhere. Right.
KB: Youre a fucking idiot
DR: I'm stupid? Yes, I'm stupid
DR: Two million on the property and half a million in rent
DR: I must be nuts
KB: You are stupid
KB: What do you think you're gonna FUCKING live here forever
KB: No. No. You're out, man.
DR: Okay.
KB: You're out today. You are out.
DR: Okay.
KB: This is my house. I will stay here tonight.
DR: Okay
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB07/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
"I’m Staying. You Leave." Keith tells me flat-out: “I’m staying here tonight. You can leave.” This, after forcing his way in, smashing the front door, and threatening me with violence.
He wasn’t bluffing — he believed he could occupy the property by force while I was still legally in it. There was no notice. No eviction. Just trespass and threats.
Media24 left that part out — preferring a narrative that cast him as the rightful owner facing a rogue tenant. This is the footage they omitted. Their articles never once acknowledged that he entered unlawfully or threatened to take occupancy.
WHATSAPP MESSAGES: THE UNFILTERED TRUTH
The WhatsApp exchanges with both my attorney and Keith’s managing agent disprove Keith’s court claims entirely. These messages confirm:
✔ Keith’s illegal actions.
✔ His full awareness of his wrongdoing.
✔ His deliberate use of timing to cause maximum harm.
✔ His manipulation of the eviction process—seeking to extract full rent until he could physically seize the property.
1. WhatsApp Messages with Attorney Johannes Loubser
Key Excerpts from February 27 – March 2, 2022:
DR [27/02/2022, 18:52:26]: Johannes, you’re not going to believe this—or possibly you will—but Keith has gone and done it again. He’s asked Willem to lock us out of our house. This is the third time in as many months.
The guest landed hours ago after a full day of travel. I dropped the bags at the property, went to the beach, and came back to find it locked. Keith knew the guest was about to check in, and he timed this deliberately to cause maximum damage and distress.
Analysis:
-
Keith’s actions were not about arrears or legal disputes—he orchestrated the timing for maximum harm, ensuring a traveller arriving after a long-haul journey was stranded outside.
-
This was not negligence—it was a strategic, deliberate act of cruelty.
Johannes [27/02/2022, 19:01:18]: His lawyer also sent a letter, Darren, showing an intention to cancel the lease. I strongly suggest we take this seriously and apply to Court. I will obviously forward and prepare a letter in response to their letter. Do you have access to the house currently?
Analysis:
-
Keith falsely portrayed this letter as an eviction order, which it was not.
-
Legally, it held no weight—it was merely a scare tactic.
-
Johannes immediately identified this for what it was—a legally baseless manoeuvre requiring court intervention.
Johannes [27/02/2022, 19:44:10]: No, I mean that he cannot lock you out without a court order.
Analysis:
-
Keith had been told repeatedly that his actions were unlawful.
-
His decision to proceed regardless proves malicious intent.
Johannes [27/02/2022, 19:45:11]: That is massive bullying and extortion.
Analysis:
-
Even Keith’s own lawyer knew what this was—extortion and illegal self-help.
-
This was not about business or law—this was about Keith forcing an outcome through intimidation.
2. WhatsApp Messages with Keith’s Managing Agent, Anton Moller
Keith’s own managing agent confirmed in writing that his actions were illegal and irrational.
Key Excerpts from February 26 – March 27, 2022:
Anton [27/02/2022, 20:42:56]: The guests are only allowed back in because your lawyer sent Keith a very clear outline of what would happen if he didn’t. Keith caved but dressed it up as concern for the poor family who had touched his heart. Such a croc of shit…the man doesn’t have a heart.
Analysis:
-
Keith attempted to rewrite history by pretending he allowed the guests back in out of kindness.
-
In reality, he only backed down under legal threat.
-
Even his own agent saw through his lies.
Anton [27/02/2022, 20:31:52]: According to Keith, the original rental agreement and the new verbal arrangement are now both terminated. However, he will allow your guests to stay for the two weeks.
How nice of him… whilst you have paid rent up to the end of March!
Analysis:
-
Keith still wanted full rent paid, despite attempting to take the property back.
-
His position was completely self-serving—he would continue accepting full payments until the very moment he physically seized control.
Anton [27/02/2022, 21:12:10]: I just thought that if Keith in his head has terminated the lease and it’s all over, then surely he’s not expecting any rent for April? If this termination was correct—which we know it’s not—then clearly the tenant would not pay any further rent. Maybe we should call his bluff and say if you’re terminating the lease, Keith, we don’t pay rent anymore, because I imagine that’s the last thing he wants.
Analysis:
-
Keith was fully aware the lease was still in effect—he just wanted to twist the situation to serve his goal.
-
His play book was clear:
-
Lock us out.
-
Claim the lease was over.
-
Still demand full rent.
-
Take back the property once we gave up fighting.
-
Anton [27/02/2022, 21:48:21]: I’m done. I’m drawing a line with immediate effect. I’ve tried my very best to make this work, my friend, but obviously, I sadly failed.
Analysis:
-
Even Keith’s own managing agent could no longer tolerate his conduct.
-
Anton’s resignation is proof that Keith’s behaviour was indefensible.
Analysis: The WhatsApp Evidence Proves Keith’s Lies
✔ Every independent professional involved—his agent, my attorney—rejected Keith’s version of events.
✔ Keith’s attempt to rewrite history was destroyed by his own agent’s words.
✔ His illegal eviction tactics were clearly premeditated.
✔ His continued demand for full rent, even while locking us out, exposes his duplicity.
Keith was not just trying to reclaim the property—he was doing so while maximizing rent payments, dragging it out until he physically took control.
KEITH BROAD & INGE BROAD - HOME INVASION
DR: TO THE POLICEMAN: you did note that he broke in. And kicked the door in
KB: Well, you locked me out.
KB: It's my house. I'll break in whenever I want
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB08/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
This clip happens outside the house, but the threats continue. Keith tells me again that I have no right to be there and says he’ll “drag me out” if necessary.
It was filmed minutes after he kicked the door in. His aggression is clear. His contempt for the law even clearer.
Every part of this campaign was filmed — Media24 still inverted the truth, casting Keith as the target of harassment and me as the attacker. One viewing of this video tells a very different story.
Yet Media24 promoted the falsehood that I had harassed Keith — ignoring his threats and actions.
ANTON RESIGNS: THE BREAKING POINT
After enduring months of abuse, harassment, and threats, Keith’s conduct on February 27, 2022, was the final straw for Anton Moller, his managing agent. Anton resigned that day, walking away from his role as Keith’s agent—despite the substantial fees he was earning from the arrangement.
This resignation is highly significant for several reasons:
✔ Letting agents do not typically resign from paying clients.
✔ Anton was not being paid by Keith—he was being paid by me—so his decision was not financial but ethical.
✔ He endured constant interference, insults, and manipulation from Keith and Inge.
✔ Keith’s illegal behaviour made it impossible to continue managing the property professionally.
Anton’s resignation further exposes Keith’s conduct for what it was—so outrageous that even his own representatives refused to work with him.
1. The Tipping Point: Anton’s Final Exchange with Inge Broad
Keith’s wife, Inge Broad, had been part of the harassment campaign, often blaming Anton for the chaos instead of recognizing that Keith’s illegal actions were the problem. Anton’s final message to her makes his frustration clear:
WhatsApp Excerpt – Anton to Inge (27/02/2022, 21:48:21):
Anton Agent: I’m now listening to your personal insults again, of which I take a dim view—unjustified, unfair, and not factually correct!
You don’t have ANY idea on how much effort & time I’ve put into this rental, the complicated issues, the administration, sending out accounts, checking and correcting your amounts, following up on a daily basis, sending emails, meetings with Darren, 100’s of WA messages and emails, meetings with Keith & Darren, mediating to keep them out of court, saving them enormous legal expenses. Obviously, you don’t know anything about this as Keith and his personal assistant don’t inform you.
Analysis:
-
Anton had spent months trying to manage Keith’s erratic and unlawful behaviour.
-
He had gone far beyond the normal responsibilities of a property manager—handling legal disputes, mediating conflicts, and trying to prevent Keith from dragging the matter into court.
-
Instead of gratitude, he was met with insults and blame.
2. The Breaking Point: Anton’s Formal Resignation
Anton immediately resigned, making it clear that Keith’s conduct had made the situation unworkable.
WhatsApp Excerpt – Anton Resigns (27/02/2022, 21:54:38):
Anton Agent: Sorry Darren.
I can’t go on like this. I’m done! I’m drawing a line with immediate effect. I’ve tried my very best to make this work, my friend, but obviously, I sadly failed!
Analysis:
-
Anton had been patient for months—but February 27 was the breaking point.
-
He had tried to mediate and manage an unmanageable landlord, only to be abused, overruled, and disrespected at every turn.
-
Resigning immediately shows how toxic and unsustainable Keith’s behaviour was.
3. The Financial Factor: Walking Away from Income
Letting agents rarely resign from profitable clients. However, Anton was being paid directly by me, not Keith, meaning Keith’s actions were so unbearable that Anton walked away from income he was still receiving.
WhatsApp Excerpt – Anton to Inge (27/02/2022, 21:48:21):
Anton Agent: Since Keith has terminated the original Lease Agreement and is not honouring the new verbal arrangement with Darren, Rawson Properties is technically not the agent anymore. We hereby withdraw from being the agent for your property with immediate effect!
We will pay the Mun & utility funds over to you once received, whereafter we will not be involved anymore.
Analysis:
-
Anton had no financial incentive to resign—his fees were still being paid.
-
His departure was based purely on principle and frustration.
-
This reinforces how extreme Keith’s conduct was—so bad that even those financially benefiting from the situation chose to walk away.
4. Keith’s Manipulation and Manufactured Chaos
Even in the final moments before Anton resigned, Keith continued to shift the goalposts, fabricating new accusations and financial demands out of nowhere.
WhatsApp Excerpt – Anton to Darren (27/02/2022, 22:16:15):
Anton Agent: Thanks, Darren. I agree with you 💯
The man is literally insane. He has a tenant pumping millions into his property, I have paid him at least R20,000 or R30,000 a month over what it’s worth, and a tenant with whom there will never be a day’s void. It’s a landlord’s dream.
Analysis:
-
Keith’s claims of financial distress were completely false.
-
Even his own agent recognized the absurdity of his behaviour.
Anton knew Keith was trying to extract more money by creating fake issues.
Final Analysis: Anton’s Resignation Confirms Keith’s Conduct Was Indefensible
✔ Even Keith’s own agent could no longer justify or tolerate his actions.
✔ The resignation was immediate and final—Anton wanted nothing more to do with Keith.
✔ Keith’s fabricated issues were transparent—his only goal was to extract more money and take back the property.
✔ Anton had been patient, professional, and diligent—but even he had reached his limit.
Keith’s conduct was so outrageous, so unethical, and so unmanageable that even his own team abandoned him.
A Personal Loss and a Bad Omen
Anton’s resignation was a significant personal loss, and I knew immediately that the situation would deteriorate rapidly without him. His departure came as a shock—not because it was unexpected, but because it was the last thing I wanted or needed. However, it was completely understandable.
If I had ever had a spare moment to reflect during those months of relentless battles with Keith, I would have realized Anton’s resignation was inevitable. No one should have to endure what he went through, nor should they have to dedicate the level of work and time that he did for a situation that was impossible to manage.
But my sadness at his resignation was also personal. Anton was one of the very few people I met in South Africa who was honourable, professional, and honest. Unlike so many others, he did not plot, plan, or scheme. He did not see me as an opportunity for financial gain. He was one of the very few people I truly trusted, and that trust came from his straightforward honesty and professionalism.
Anton possessed qualities that I did not—and that Keith certainly did not. Diplomacy, patience, and a calm, calming presence. Without Anton, the situation would have spiralled out of control much faster. And without Anton, the various compromises that were reached after Keith’s attacks would never have been possible.
As frustrated and distressed as I was with Keith’s constant attacks and manipulations, I hope I never took it out on Anton. I likely vented, yes, but I never directed my frustrations at him. Keith, however, operated differently. He and Inge treated Anton appallingly.
Anton sent me several voice notes that Inge had left him, and her tone was unmistakable contempt. She did not speak to him as a person but rather as if he were a servant or a slave.
While R10,000 a month is not an insignificant sum, the stress, chaos, and relentless energy drain Keith created made it completely unjustifiable.
A few names come to mind when I think of those I trusted—Anton, Chandre, Markus, Lauren, and Louise. It’s a sad indictment that, after four years in South Africa, I can only think of four people.
Scams Within Scams
It was only after signing the lease that I discovered yet another scam Keith had orchestrated. I had assumed—as would any reasonable person—that the landlord’s managing agent fees were being paid by the landlord. That is standard practice. However, it turned out that I was the one paying the management fees—not Keith.
Initially, discussions about the lease had been based on a rental amount of R80,000 per month. But suddenly and very late in the process, this was increased to R90,000 per month. By that point, we were too far into negotiations to back out. As I was focused on the long-term, I did not consider it a dealbreaker.
However, I later learned that the R10,000 increase was not rent—it was Rawson Properties’ agency fee. Normally, management fees are paid by the landlord. Yet Keith manipulated the arrangement so that I, the tenant, was covering his management costs.
This was not an accident. It was a calculated move, designed to maximize Keith’s personal financial benefit at my expense.
KEITH BROAD & INGE BROAD - HOME INVASION
DR: that’s how it works
KB: He wants a court order.
DR: Jesus Christ. Gimme a half a million back
KB: YOU must go to court to get a court order my friend.
KB: coz I'm back in this house
DR: You must go to court to court order.
KB: And mi back in this house
KB: He says I must get a court order. No, you must get, come and listen.
DR: The fact that you have got a sinister lawyer does not mean
KB: Listen to this FUCKING IDIOT. It's a joke.
KB: Ya your lawyer said he receives it.
KB: He's an IDIOT, man. I'm sitting with this oak, saying he's not doing that. Says he owns the house. Can you believe this prick
KB: The lease is cancelled. I own the house . He is out.
KB: And that’s it
DR: You cannot cancel a lease with a letter
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB09/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
Series Media24 Inversion: Every clip in this series exposes the same truth: Keith Broad was violent, aggressive, and unlawful — and Media24 turned him into the victim.
Article after article ignored the footage, distorted the facts, and refused all efforts to correct the record. What you’re watching isn’t disputed. It’s documented.
And yet, to this day, they’ve left the lies online, rejecting every attempt at transparency. This isn’t just injustice — it’s what a coordinated smear campaign looks like. They reversed the entire narrative — and their refusal to correct it shows exactly how deliberate it was.
THE PROTECTION ORDER APPLICATION
As a direct result of Keith’s conduct that day, I was left with genuine fear for my safety, the safety of my staff, and even the guests. The physical aggression, explicit threats, and repeated unlawful evictions made it clear that this was not going to stop unless legal action was taken.
To try and establish some level of security, we applied for a protection order.
This was not just about personal safety—it was also about stabilizing the property’s income. A property that should have been generating over half a million rand per month was instead making a fraction of that, purely due to Keith’s continuous illegal evictions, interference, and the ever-present threat of another attack. The stop-start nature of the booking diary made it impossible to operate with confidence, as we were constantly on edge, expecting another unlawful eviction attempt.
We completed the protection order application, ensuring that every statement made within it was entirely accurate, supported by:
✔ Video evidence of Keith’s aggression and forced entry.
✔ Transcript evidence of his threats and unlawful conduct.
✔ WhatsApp evidence proving his intent, dishonesty, and manipulations.
A protection order—especially when finalized—is not a civil matter; it is a criminal one. Had Keith breached it, a warrant for his arrest would have been issued immediately.
The filing of this application was a necessary step, not just to protect us from physical harm but also to try and restore a sense of normality and security to the property’s operations.
[PROTECTION ORDER]
Analysis and Key Points from the Protection Order Application
The Protection Order Application and Affidavit lay out the harassment, threats, and unlawful conduct that made this legal step necessary. The key details from the provided excerpts include:
1. Basis for the Application: Keith’s Threats and Harassment
The affidavit makes it explicitly clear that Keith not only engaged in aggressive, unlawful behaviour but actively threatened physical violence.
Excerpt (Point 8 – Protection Order Affidavit):
He proceeded to harass and threaten me at the property, calling me names such as "pussy" and "idiot" and "stupid," swearing at me and refusing to leave despite multiple requests. He stated that he would "klap" me and threatened to assault me.
Key Takeaways:
✔ Keith’s behaviour went beyond intimidation—it involved explicit threats of physical violence.
✔ Swearing, name-calling, and refusing to leave escalated the situation.
✔ This was not a one-time outburst but a continuation of his unlawful tactics.
2. Keith’s Forced Entry and Illegal Eviction Attempts
The affidavit details how Keith repeatedly violated the lease agreement, attempting to take back possession of the property through unlawful means.
Excerpt (Point 6 – Protection Order Affidavit):
On the 1st of March 2022 at around 18:36, Mr. Keith Ronald Broad arrived at the property with two security/bodyguards, kicked or broke down the door, and attempted to evict me from the property without following any due process. This was after previously unlawfully denying me access to the property on three occasions.
Key Takeaways:
✔ Keith broke into the property—this was not a dispute, but an outright illegal home invasion.
✔ This followed previous attempts to unlawfully deny access—proving a clear pattern of misconduct.
✔ Keith’s disregard for legal processes highlights his belief that the law did not apply to him.
3. Keith’s False Claim That He Could Cancel the Lease at Will
Keith falsely claimed that he had cancelled the lease and that I had no right to be in the property.
Excerpt (Point 7 – Protection Order Affidavit):
Mr. Broad claimed that the lease has been cancelled by his lawyers (which I deny) and that I should vacate the property, repeatedly stating that it is his house and that he will personally take immediate occupation.
Key Takeaways:
✔ Keith acted as if he had the unilateral right to cancel a lease—when legally, he did not.
✔ He completely disregarded the lease agreement, which explicitly confirmed my right to occupy the property.
✔ The repeated phrase “his house” reinforces his belief that the lease agreement was irrelevant—showing total contempt for tenant rights and the law.
4. Reasonable Fear of Further Violence
The affidavit makes it clear that this was not an isolated incident but an ongoing pattern of harassment, intimidation, and aggression.
Excerpt (Point 10 – Protection Order Affidavit):
I have a reasonable apprehension that he will return to the property today and further attempt to assault, harass, and evict me and therefore take the law into his own hands to avoid following the necessary court process.
Key Takeaways:
✔ This was not paranoia—it was a logical, evidence-based expectation based on Keith’s past actions.
✔ Keith had already demonstrated that he was willing to break the law to achieve his goal.
✔ The fear that he would return was entirely justified—hence the need for a court order.
5. Legal Urgency: A Matter of Criminal Conduct, Not Just a Civil Dispute
The affidavit underscores that this was not merely a landlord-tenant dispute but a case of intimidation, harassment, and criminal threats.
Excerpt (Point 11 – Protection Order Affidavit):
I confirm that there are no merits whatsoever to Mr. Broad’s allegations and actions, and I require this Court’s urgent protection, in view of Mr. Broad’s threat, intimidation, and harassment.
Key Takeaways:
✔ This was not a civil matter—it was a case of personal safety and legal protection from criminal behaviour.
✔ The application was urgent because Keith’s behaviour showed no signs of stopping.
✔ This statement further invalidates any claims Keith later made in legal proceedings.
6. Financial and Contractual Impact: Keith’s Harassment Disrupting Business
The protection order affidavit also provides critical financial context regarding the lease and my investments into the property.
Excerpt (Point 4 – Protection Order Affidavit):
One of the properties used for the said short-term accommodation business is located at 16 Leirmans Road, Llandudno. I let this property from Mr. Keith Ronald Broad for a quarterly amount of R270,000 under a valid lease with Rawson Rentals. The lease is valid until 14 October 2023, with a further option to renew and expressly permits me to refurbish the premises, which refurbishment I have done at great cost.
Key Takeaways:
✔ The lease was legally binding and had a long-term validity—Keith’s attempts to cancel it were unlawful.
✔ I had invested significantly in refurbishing the property with explicit permission.
✔ Keith’s actions directly sabotaged the business potential of the property.
Final Analysis: The Protection Order Was Absolutely Necessary
The affidavit makes it indisputably clear that:
✔ Keith’s threats of violence, home invasion, and forced eviction attempts were ongoing and escalating.
✔ His belief that he could unilaterally cancel the lease and remove me was entirely false.
✔ His actions were criminal, not just civil disputes—necessitating urgent legal protection.
✔ The financial impact of his harassment was severe, affecting both business operations and safety.
The protection order was not just justified—it was essential to prevent further physical harm, financial damage, and unlawful eviction attempts.
LEASE AGREMENTS & CONTRACTS
Lease Agreements: Proof of Legal Tenure & Fraudulent Misrepresentation by Keith Broad, Inge Broad
Legally Binding Lease Confirming Five-Year Tenure
The signed lease agreements establish my valid five-year tenancy, the single non-negotiable condition needed to recover my multimillion-rand investment. Despite this, Keith Broad & Inge Broad violated the agreement immediately after renovations were complete, seizing back the property for their own financial gain.
Page 8, Clause 15 of the lease was deliberately crossed out and initialled by both parties, proving full consent to the subletting model. This directly contradicts Keith & Inge Broad’s later fabricated claims that they neither knew of nor approved short-term rentals.
The lie is further exposed through the affidavit of Anton Moller, managing agent for Keith Broad, confirming subletting approval, alongside extensive WhatsApp conversations with Gail Broad, Keith’s cousin and letting agent. These messages show active discussions about subletting, guest placements, property condition, and the agreed refurbishment plan.
Despite full landlord approval, once renovations dramatically increased property value, Keith & Inge Broad reversed their stance, falsely claiming the agreed refurbishments were malicious tenant damage to fabricate legal grounds for eviction. This criminal deception was part of their coordinated scheme to erase documented agreements, unlawfully reclaim the property, and steal the financial benefits of my investment
THE DEFENCE OF THE PROTECTION ORDER
Keith's response to that protection order was an affidavit that bore no relationship to the truth. Compare his affidavit with the video footage on the transcripts and his affidavit is a master class in perjury
Keith Broad’s Affidavit (Defence Against Protection Order)
I, the undersigned, KEITH RONALD BROAD, do hereby make oath and say:
-
I am the respondent in this matter.
-
From the outset, there have been many disputes between the applicant and myself. These disputes continue to accrue and have led to an acrimonious relationship between us.
-
However, my actions never went as far as constituting harassment for purposes of the Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011 (“the Act”).
-
The applicant was consistently and repeatedly tardy in making payment of the amounts due in terms of the lease.
-
Requests for payment of monies owing were almost always made by the appointed estate agent, Mr. Anton Moller. Asking a tenant for prompt payment of overdue amounts does not constitute harassment.
-
I believe that applicant has brought this application not because he is genuinely afraid of being harassed by me, but rather as a bargaining tool in our settlement negotiations.
-
The events of 1 March 2022 were regrettable, but applicant has provided the Honourable Court with a one-sided account that omits the reason why I arrived at the property that day.
-
I will provide the omitted facts. Once the full factual setting is considered, the events of 1 March 2022 will be seen in a different light.
-
My housekeeper, Mr. Wellem Chirwa, has been working at my Llandudno property for the past five years. He had his own room there. During his tenancy, applicant made unauthorized structural changes to the property.
-
Around 17h30 on 1 March 2022, I received a phone call from Mr. Chirwa, who informed me that applicant and his men were threatening him and telling him to leave.
-
They were acting aggressively, knocking on his door, intimidating him, and insisting that he start packing his things.
-
As soon as I heard this, I left my place of work in the Foreshore and drove to the Llandudno property to assist Mr. Chirwa.
-
When I arrived at the property, Mr. Chirwa had been thrown out of the house and was left stranded on the side of the road.
-
My reaction was regrettable, but reasonable in the circumstances.
-
Mr. Chirwa was assaulted and unlawfully evicted from his room at my property. This was unjust behaviour by the applicant.
-
Mr. Chirwa later made a statement at the Hout Bay Police Station.
-
What followed was an exchange of words between myself and the applicant, including his employees, but no physical confrontation.
-
The "bodyguards" I arrived with were, in fact, members of PPA Security, who handle security for my property.
-
I asked PPA to accompany me as I was nervous after hearing that applicant and his employees were acting aggressively toward Mr. Chirwa.
-
I deny that I unlawfully denied applicant access to the property. Any such instances occurred after the lease was cancelled.
-
I deny that my wife and I have continuously harassed the applicant on WhatsApp.
-
The applicant has sought this protection order under false pretences and is not genuinely afraid.
-
I pray that the interim protection order be set aside and that applicant’s application be dismissed with costs.
Keith Broad Affidavit In The September Hearing Of Both Protection Orders
Summary: Keith Broad is a Compulsive Liar
Every key claim in Keith’s affidavit is demonstrably false, as video, transcripts, and messages directly contradict him. His entire defence hinges on rewriting reality to paint himself as the victim.
Keith Broad’s Affidavit vs. The Evidence
SAPS CORRUPTION
Arrest Application & Warrant For Keith Broad Ignored
Yet They Executed An Arrest To Remove Me, With No Warrant and No Cause
An arrest warrant for Keith Broad had already been issued - official, judicial, enforceable.
But instead of executing it, Hout Bay SAPS shielded Keith Broad while illegally arresting me on his orders.
This exposes the blatant double standards at the heart of Hout Bay SAPS's conduct.
They buried a valid arrest warrant for Keith Broad yet acted immediately on his private instructions to arrest me - without a warrant, cause or any legal justification.
This proves that Hout Bay SAPS were active collaborators in a corrupt campaign led by Keith & Inge Broad, with backing from Paula Disberry, Raj Moonsamy, & media operatives at Media24.
THE DEFENCE OF THE PROTECTION ORDER
Keith's response to that protection order was an affidavit that bore no relationship to the truth. Compare his affidavit with the video footage on the transcripts and his affidavit is a master class in perjury
Keith Broad’s Affidavit (Defence Against Protection Order)
I, the undersigned, KEITH RONALD BROAD, do hereby make oath and say:
-
I am the respondent in this matter.
-
From the outset, there have been many disputes between the applicant and myself. These disputes continue to accrue and have led to an acrimonious relationship between us.
-
However, my actions never went as far as constituting harassment for purposes of the Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011 (“the Act”).
-
The applicant was consistently and repeatedly tardy in making payment of the amounts due in terms of the lease.
-
Requests for payment of monies owing were almost always made by the appointed estate agent, Mr. Anton Moller. Asking a tenant for prompt payment of overdue amounts does not constitute harassment.
-
I believe that applicant has brought this application not because he is genuinely afraid of being harassed by me, but rather as a bargaining tool in our settlement negotiations.
-
The events of 1 March 2022 were regrettable, but applicant has provided the Honourable Court with a one-sided account that omits the reason why I arrived at the property that day.
-
I will provide the omitted facts. Once the full factual setting is considered, the events of 1 March 2022 will be seen in a different light.
-
My housekeeper, Mr. Wellem Chirwa, has been working at my Llandudno property for the past five years. He had his own room there. During his tenancy, applicant made unauthorized structural changes to the property.
-
Around 17h30 on 1 March 2022, I received a phone call from Mr. Chirwa, who informed me that applicant and his men were threatening him and telling him to leave.
-
They were acting aggressively, knocking on his door, intimidating him, and insisting that he start packing his things.
-
As soon as I heard this, I left my place of work in the Foreshore and drove to the Llandudno property to assist Mr. Chirwa.
-
When I arrived at the property, Mr. Chirwa had been thrown out of the house and was left stranded on the side of the road.
-
My reaction was regrettable, but reasonable in the circumstances.
-
Mr. Chirwa was assaulted and unlawfully evicted from his room at my property. This was unjust behaviour by the applicant.
-
Mr. Chirwa later made a statement at the Hout Bay Police Station.
-
What followed was an exchange of words between myself and the applicant, including his employees, but no physical confrontation.
-
The "bodyguards" I arrived with were, in fact, members of PPA Security, who handle security for my property.
-
I asked PPA to accompany me as I was nervous after hearing that applicant and his employees were acting aggressively toward Mr. Chirwa.
-
I deny that I unlawfully denied applicant access to the property. Any such instances occurred after the lease was cancelled.
-
I deny that my wife and I have continuously harassed the applicant on WhatsApp.
-
The applicant has sought this protection order under false pretences and is not genuinely afraid.
-
I pray that the interim protection order be set aside and that applicant’s application be dismissed with costs.
Keith Broad Affidavit In The September Hearing Of Both Protection Orders
Summary: Keith Broad is a Compulsive Liar
Every key claim in Keith’s affidavit is demonstrably false, as video, transcripts, and messages directly contradict him. His entire defence hinges on rewriting reality to paint himself as the victim.
Keith Broad’s Affidavit vs. The Evidence
REBUTTAL TO KEITH BROAD'S AFFIDAVIT
1. Introduction & Context
This document serves as a formal rebuttal to the affidavit submitted by Keith Ronald Broad in response to the Protection Order application. The affidavit submitted by Mr. Broad is riddled with falsehoods, contradictions, and outright perjury, which are easily disproven by video evidence, WhatsApp messages, transcripts, and court records.
The purpose of this rebuttal is to systematically discredit his claims and expose his deliberate attempts to mislead the court.
2. Point-by-Point Rebuttal of Keith Broad’s Falsehoods
Claim 1: “My actions never went as far as constituting harassment.”
Reality: The Protection Order was granted based on overwhelming evidence of Keith’s harassment. Video footage, WhatsApp messages, and multiple witness statements confirm his aggressive and unlawful conduct, including:
-
Physically kicking in a door on 1 March 2022.
-
Threatening me with physical violence in person and via WhatsApp.
-
Repeatedly locking me out of the property illegally.
-
Sending harassing messages demanding payments that were not due.
Claim 2: “The applicant was consistently tardy in making payment.”
Reality: This is a blatant falsehood. Payment records and emails from Keith’s own estate agent, Anton Moller, confirm that payments were made as per the lease agreement. Keith altered the terms last minute, causing confusion, and then weaponized false claims of non-payment to justify his harassment.
Claim 3: “Requests for payments were made by Anton Moller, not me.”
Reality: WhatsApp messages prove Keith personally harassed me for money. He even threatened to lock the house if I did not comply. Anton Moller, on the other hand, was simply following Keith’s instructions.
Claim 4: “Applicant is using this protection order as a bargaining tool.”
Reality: The protection order was filed because Keith attempted an illegal eviction on 1 March 2022, harassed staff, and created a hostile environment.
-
Police were called multiple times due to Keith’s threats.
-
Staff left due to fear of Keith’s actions.
-
Guests were driven away, resulting in substantial financial damage.
Claim 5: “I arrived at the property to assist Mr. Chirwa.”
Reality: Keith arrived with security guards, forcibly broke down a door, and attempted to unlawfully evict me. Video evidence shows Keith yelling threats and acting aggressively—his intent was never to assist anyone but to forcefully take control of the property.
Claim 6: “Mr. Chirwa was thrown out of the house and left stranded.”
Reality: Mr. Chirwa left voluntarily. Keith coached him into making false claims after the fact. Chirwa’s statements contradict themselves, and in court, he was unable to produce any credible evidence of wrongdoing on my part.
Claim 7: “My reaction was regrettable but reasonable in the circumstances.”
Reality: Video footage proves Keith’s actions were anything but reasonable.
-
Breaking down a door
-
Verbally abusing me and staff
-
Threatening further unlawful action
These are not the actions of someone acting “reasonably.”
Claim 8: “The bodyguards were PPA Security, acting as neutral bystanders.”
Reality: PPA Security was brought by Keith and actively participated in intimidation. They blocked access and enabled his unlawful actions.
Claim 9: “I never unlawfully denied access to the property.”
Reality: Multiple documented instances show Keith locking me out illegally.
-
The lease was still valid.
-
The actions were unlawful and intended to force an eviction outside of legal processes.
Claim 10: “I deny that my wife and I harassed the applicant via WhatsApp.”
Reality: WhatsApp messages from Keith and Inge prove continuous harassment.
-
Demanding money that was not owed.
-
Sending insulting and threatening messages.
-
Direct statements about locking the house and taking it over.
Claim 11: “The applicant has suffered no harm and is not genuinely afraid.”
Reality:
-
Staff resigned out of fear.
-
Guests left due to intimidation.
-
The business suffered financial losses due to Keith’s actions.
The court granted the protection order because it recognized the clear and ongoing threat posed by Keith Broad.
3. Legal Consequences of Perjury
Keith Broad has lied under oath multiple times, and this constitutes perjury under South African law.
-
Contradictions in his affidavit prove intentional deceit.
-
Video, WhatsApp, and transcript evidence directly contradict his statements.
-
Coached statements by Mr. Chirwa further demonstrate manipulation and dishonesty.
Perjury in South Africa carries serious legal consequences, including criminal charges and imprisonment. This document will be submitted as further proof of his deliberate attempt to deceive the court.
4. Conclusion
Keith Broad’s affidavit is a fabricated attempt to rewrite reality. The protection order was granted for good reason—his ongoing harassment, unlawful eviction attempts, and physical intimidation tactics.
This rebuttal proves that:
-
Keith Broad is a compulsive liar.
-
His claims are demonstrably false.
-
His affidavit should be dismissed as perjured testimony.
Further legal action may be necessary to hold him accountable for perjury and to ensure that the protection order remains enforced.
VIDEO RECORDING REF: KB012/16
Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion & Illegal Eviction Attempt
01 March 2022
On 1 March 2023, Keith Broad kicked in the front door and stormed into the property — screaming, swearing, and threatening to drag me out.
I repeatedly told him he had no right to enter, but he forced his way in anyway, shouting “you have no f*ing lease” and calling me a ct.
This was not a misunderstanding. It was a violent and deliberate home invasion — part of a broader campaign of defamation, threats, and criminal intent. What you’re seeing is the moment the mask came off — and Media24 chose to protect the man behind it.
KEITH BROAD AFFIDAVIT IN THE SEPTEMBER HEARING OF BOTH PROTECTION ORDERS
Keith's Arrest Warrant
Keith’s Arrest Warrant: A Justice System Failure
After securing the protection order, we finally experienced a temporary lull in Keith’s harassment. However, this was not the end—just a shift in tactics. Rather than continuing his overt aggression, Keith adjusted his approach, enlisting Wouter de Swart (WDS) to act on his behalf.
At this stage, we were unaware of two critical facts:
-
If an arrest warrant was ever issued, it would be up to the local police station with jurisdiction to execute it.
-
Keith and WDS had far more influence over the local SAPS than we initially realized.
In July 2022, when WDS led yet another unlawful eviction attempt, complete with assaults and forced removals, we had no hesitation in escalating the matter. We went straight to the High Court, which promptly issued an arrest warrant for Keith Broad. The court forwarded this warrant to Hout Bay SAPS for execution.
Then—silence.
Our attorney followed up with both calls and emails. No response. Another formal legal letter was sent, demanding that SAPS execute the warrant. Still, nothing.
A Blatant Disregard for the Law
Despite holding a clear and enforceable High Court order, SAPS Hout Bay flatly refused to act. This was not a case of bureaucratic delay—it was deliberate inaction.
However, saying SAPS did nothing wouldn’t be entirely accurate.
Instead of arresting Keith Broad for his very real and documented breaches of the protection order, they arrested me. And not on any genuine legal grounds—but on completely manufactured charges.
Trumped-Up Charges: The SAPS Cover-Up
The charge they initially concocted? Theft of three televisions.
This was particularly absurd, as:
-
The TVs had already been reported stolen by guests.
-
I was the one who reported the theft to SAPS weeks earlier.
-
A crime reference number had been issued, fingerprints taken, and an official docket opened—by the very same SAPS station that later arrested me on the same fabricated charge.
This wasn’t incompetence. This was a deliberate, calculated move to shield Keith from facing justice.
The Reality of the Situation
Let’s be absolutely clear:
-
A real arrest warrant, issued by the High Court, for serious and proven criminal conduct was ignored.
-
Meanwhile, SAPS proactively fabricated a case against me and executed an arrest without a warrant, fully aware that the allegations were entirely false.
Keith had successfully manipulated the police, using them as his personal enforcers. This wasn’t just negligence—it was corruption in plain sight.
NEXT CHAPTER .....
The Truth Suid Afrika
Discover the untold stories behind the false headlines of the Media24 articles. Uncover the truth behind the fabricated content of those articles. Understand the motivation that powered the consortium's actions.
"Those who wield authority without scrutiny wield corruption without consequence." - Naomi Klein