
THE 358 QUESTIONS
Serg Stevens Conduct & The Many Questions It Raises
If I were to sit with Sergeant Stevens and ask him questions, I would have an awful lot of them. Three hundred and fifty-eight for sergeant Stevens alone. His conduct was so extraordinary, malicious, premeditated, calculating, illegal, immoral, and sinister that, even though I know the answers to most of these questions, I would still want to hear his explanation.
In essence, I’d want to understand how he could possibly try to wriggle out of acknowledging what he was up to and why he chose to act as he did.
Because no police officer acts in the way Sergeant Stevens did, and certainly not for such an extended period, with so many individual actions that speak to his true motivations and intentions. His conduct, along with that of his colleagues, raises fundamental and deeply troubling questions. If answered honestly, these questions would expose significant and systemic corruption within law enforcement. There are no plausible explanations, only the truth of how deeply this abuse runs.
Consider, for instance, the following questions. I’ll address them purely as an example, as the same principles and methodology apply to all of the questions I will raise throughout this document. It would be too lengthy a task to repeat this structure for each of the 358 questions included, but in reading all of the questions, there is no credible or plausible explanation other than the ones I have outlined.
-
Could you explain why there is no indication of any investigative work conducted by you or SAPS prior to the arrest?
The fact that no legitimate investigation was carried out prior to my arrest demonstrates that this was a case of malicious prosecution, with no regard for actual criminal conduct on my part. There is no explanation for this failure other than the clear intent to use the legal system as a tool to harm me.
-
Why does the docket contain only a limited number of affidavits?
-
Why was Paula Disberry, an individual in significant legal conflict with me, the one providing the affidavits?
No legitimate police investigation would contain only a handful of affidavits, particularly not when all of them came from the very individual with whom I was embroiled in high-stakes civil litigation. This directly calls into question the integrity of the entire case.
-
Did you personally interview any of the individuals for whom Paula Disberry supplied affidavits? If not, could you explain why?
-
Did you verify any part of the statements made in Paula Disberry’s affidavit or check the accuracy of the evidence provided?
The answer is clear: he did not. The only logical conclusion is that the landlords effectively built the docket themselves, with SAPS showing no interest or initiative in conducting any legitimate investigation.
-
Why is the only substantive activity in the docket dated June 7, with no entries before or after that date?
The answer is glaringly obvious: the date aligns with key civil court hearings where Paula Disberry was trying to seize back the property. No legitimate police action would have resulted in a six-month lull in activity before and after June 7, followed by a sudden flurry of activity tied to the landlord’s needs. This is not a case of legitimate investigation; it’s a clear attempt to time the arrest with the landlords’ civil case.
-
What prompted the decision to arrest when no new evidence had been presented in the six months following Paula Disberry’s affidavits?
-
What evidence have you gathered that substantiates the allegations or charges brought against me?
Again, the answer is simple: the arrest was dictated by private individuals, purely to suit their needs and timetable. There is no legitimate police activity here—no investigation, no new evidence, and no substantiated charges. The December 2022 arrest was orchestrated to serve the interests of the landlords, not to uphold justice.
There Can Be No Credible Or Plausible Explanation
This is the crux of the purpose behind this document. There can be no credible explanation for:
-
A. The absence of any legitimate investigative work prior to my arrest.
-
B. The selective and suspicious nature of the affidavits in the docket.
-
C. The refusal to interview key witnesses or verify the evidence.
-
D. The unexplained gap in activity before and after June 7.
-
E. The timing of the arrest in direct correlation with the landlords’ civil case needs.
There are no credible explanations or justifications for these actions. And these were just the first eight questions used as examples.
The conduct exhibited by Sergeant Stevens, his colleagues, and the landlords was so extreme, so targeted, and carried out over such a prolonged period that the only plausible explanation is the one I’ve outlined. This was not a series of coincidental failures or innocent mistakes. It was a concerted effort to manipulate the justice system for the benefit of private interests, and the systemic corruption involved cannot be denied.

FACT FILES: EXPOSING THE LIES, REVEALING THE TRUTH
On 28 July 2022, Private Investigator Wouter de Swart impersonated a police officer, calling Chandre’s husband under false pretences to gather personal information about her vehicle and its ownership.
This unsettling act, combined with surveillance of my properties, video recordings, and implied threats, violated the protection order and aimed to intimidate and destabilize my staff and associates. These actions underscore the alarming lengths Mr. de Swart and his collaborators are willing to go, seemingly to obstruct justice and deflect accountability.

Sergeant Stevens Conduct And The Many Questions It Raises: Examples From The Document
If I were to sit with Serg Stevens and ask him questions I would have an awful lot of them. His conduct was so extraordinary, malicious, premediated, calculating, illegal, immoral, and sinister that even though I know the answers to most of the questions, I would still want to hear his explanation. In essence to see how he could possibly try to wriggle out of acknowledging what he was up to and why. Because no police officer acts in a way Serg Stevens did, and for such an extended period and with so many individual actions that speak to his real motivation and intent
PRE-ARREST
Pre-Arrest
-
Could you explain why there is no indication of any investigative work conducted by you or SAPS prior to the arrest?
-
Why does the docket contain only a limited number of affidavits?
-
Why was PD, an individual in significant conflict with the accused, the one providing the affidavits?
-
Did you personally interview any of the individuals for whom Paula Disberry supplied affidavits? If not, could you explain why?
-
Did you verify any part of the statements made in PD’s affidavit or check the accuracy of the evidence provided?
-
Why is the only substantive activity in the docket dated June 7, with no entries before or after that date?
-
What prompted the decision to arrest when no new evidence had been presented in the six months following PD’s affidavits?
-
What evidence have you gathered that substantiates the allegations or charges brought against the accused?
Passport
-
Who handed you the accused’s passport?
-
Why was the passport not returned to the accused?
-
On what grounds did you continue to hold the accused’s passport?
Pre-Arrest Notice to Others
-
How far in advance of the arrest was Ragi Moonsamy informed?
-
How far in advance of the arrest was Keith Broad informed?
-
How far in advance of the arrest was IB informed?
-
How far in advance of the arrest was Paula Disberry informed?
-
Why was PD, who had no relationship with the accused at the time, aware of the arrest beforehand?
-
Why was the housekeeper informed of the arrest prior to its execution, and why was he offered a job with the owner post-arrest?
-
On whose authority was the job offer made, and who conveyed it?\
Media
-
Who contacted the media to inform them of the arrest?
-
How long before the arrest were the media informed?
Timing of Arrest
-
When was the decision made to arrest the accused?
-
Who made that decision, and what were the reasons behind it?
-
What role did Mr de Swardt play in the decision to arrest?
-
Why was the accused arrested on December 14?
-
Why was the arrest executed on that specific date, a year after the related matter was allegedly fabricated?
Relationships and Conflicts
-
Were you aware of the relationships between KB, IB, PD, and MR DE SWARDT?
-
Were you aware that Mr de Swardt was working for KB?
-
Were you aware of the objectives of MR DE Swardt’s mandate?
-
Were you aware of the extensive civil litigation between the accused and KB?
Coincidences and Timing
-
Was it a coincidence that the arrest coincided with the timing of KB’s submission in the civil court matter?
-
Was it a coincidence that the arrest was executed just a few working hours after Keith Broad submitted that application?
Use of Resources
-
On what basis did you justify the extensive use of police and state resources?
-
Why was it deemed necessary to utilize a dozen police personnel for the arrest?
Arrest Warrant
-
Where did you apply for an arrest warrant from a magistrate?
-
Was the warrant granted or rejected?
-
If rejected, did you apply for another arrest warrant from a magistrate?
-
If rejected, did you submit a new application with additional evidence or the same evidence?
-
Where did you apply for the warrant?
-
Was the arrest warrant granted or rejected?
-
If granted, where is the arrest warrant?
-
If rejected, on what basis was the arrest executed?
Seizure Warrant
-
Why did a seizure warrant suddenly deemed urgent?
-
Where did you apply for the seizure warrant?
-
What was the reason for its initial rejection?
-
Did you apply for the seizure warrant elsewhere?
-
When reapplying, did you present additional information to justify the warrant?
-
Was the warrant issued by a magistrate or a SAPS officer?
-
What was the justification for not following the usual procedure of obtaining a warrant from a magistrate?
-
What urgency justified circumventing the standard procedure?

FACT FILES: EXPOSING THE LIES, REVEALING THE TRUTH
The consortium, Wouter de Swardt, and SAPS officers spread false claims about my identity and activities to instil fear and distrust.
These lies, ranging from alleged Interpol warrants to fabricated villa scams, were weaponized to intimidate others into compliance.
Witnesses were coerced with threats of prosecution and lengthy prison sentences unless they agreed to scripted testimonies—proving the case was built on manipulation, not evidence.

Urgency of Arrest
-
The accused had been residing at the property for a year, and you held his passport, making travel impossible. Considering the property was both his home and business, what urgency justified the arrest? Specifically, why could the arrest not wait a day or two to obtain a seizure warrant from a magistrate, given that the matter had already waited a full year?
Special Task Force
-
Why was a Special Task Force (STF) team deployed?
-
Who made the request for the STF team?
-
On what basis was that request made?
-
What information or evidence led to the conclusion that an STF team was necessary?
-
Who provided that evidence?
-
Did you or the STF find any reason during or after the search and arrest that substantiated the premise for including the STF?
Eviction
-
Why were the keys to the accused’s home handed over to MR DE SWARDT?
Benette
-
Who is Benette?
-
Is Benette a police officer, and was he/she appointed by SAPS to investigate the accused?
-
If not, why was Benette contacting potential witnesses claiming to be a police officer?
-
What is the relationship between Benette and Belville?
-
What is the relationship between Paula Disberry and Benette?
-
Why did some of those contacted believe that Benette was working for and on behalf of PD?
-
Why were Paula Disberry and his partner PVW contacting potential witnesses, purporting to be assisting, or running an investigation into the accused?
-
Why were those contacted told a series of falsehoods?
-
Why were those contacted threatened with ten to thirty years in prison?
-
Why and on whose authority was immunity from prosecution offered?
Follow-Up
-
How long before the arrest did Mr de Swardt inform you that it was needed?
-
If the arrest was a police operation to apprehend the accused at his home, was the landlord communicated with extensively prior to, during, and after the arrest?
-
If the arrest was a police operation to apprehend the accused at 32 Fisherman’s Bend, why was the landlord of 16 Leirmans Road communicated with extensively prior to, during, and after the arrest?
THE ARREST
-
At what point was the decision made to arrest the accused?
-
Who made the decision to arrest the accused?
-
What were the reasons behind the decision to arrest the accused?
-
Is there any evidence in the docket that resulted from your own efforts or investigation?
-
Why is there no indication of any investigative work undertaken by you or SAPS prior to the arrest?
-
What is the history and mandate of WEDS?
-
What is Denis Dalton’s role and mandate in this operation?
-
Did you apply for an arrest warrant or only a seizure warrant?
-
If you applied for an arrest warrant, where did you apply for it?
-
Was the arrest warrant granted or rejected?
-
If the arrest warrant was rejected, what were the reasons for its rejection?
-
If the arrest warrant was rejected, did you present new and additional information to a different magistrate or the same docket to a different magistrate in search of a different outcome?
-
If an arrest warrant was granted, by whom was it granted and why is there no copy in the docket?
-
If no arrest warrant was granted, on what basis and whose authority did you execute the arrest and conduct the search and seizure?
-
Why did you deny the accused’s request to call his attorney during the arrest at his home?
-
Did you dial the correct number when attempting to call the accused’s attorney?
-
Why did you only let the phone ring a couple of times before ending the call?
-
Why did you inform the accused that the failed call attempt represented his one allowable call?
-
Why was the accused not present during the search of his home and instead had housekeepers show the police around?
-
What did you expect to find that required the involvement of two dozen personnel?

FACT FILES: EXPOSING THE LIES, REVEALING THE TRUTH
The extent of broken laws, misused resources, and enlisted personnel makes it improbable that corruption was limited to Serg Stevens, Serg Duna, and Mr. de Swardt.
For the commander to claim ignorance of over 200 documented violations, including fabricated charges, misuse of the STF, and obstruction of justice, defies credibility, suggesting deeper complicity within the chain of command.

The Illegal Involvement of Civilians in Arrest and Search
-
Why was Denis Dalton present in the accused’s home during the search on December 14 at 32 Fisherman’s Bend?
-
Why was Mr de Swardt present in the accused’s home during the search on December 14 at 32 Fisherman’s Bend?
-
Why were Denis Dalton and Mr de Swardt allowed to walk around unsupervised?
-
What was the purpose of their involvement in the search?
-
Why were they specifically looking for the safe?
Search for the Safe
-
Why did you tell the accused that you needed him to accompany you around the property to show him each room when this had already been done by the police in the previous two hours?
-
Why did you tell the accused that you needed him to accompany you around the property to show him each room and then take him to the master bedroom?
-
Why were Denis Dalton and Mr de Swardt waiting for the accused in the master bedroom?
-
Why did the three of you question the accused about the location of the safe?
-
What were you expecting or hoping to find in the safe?
-
Were you aware of the rumours, believed by Denis Dalton and Wouter de Swardt, that the safe contained cash, diamonds, and highly valuable items?
-
Why did you tell the accused that you needed him to accompany you around the property to show him each room, and then after visiting the master bedroom, take him away and no longer wish to continue the room-by-room search with him?
The Operation
-
Why was it the universally held view of everyone present that Mr de Swardt was leading the operation?
-
Why were police officers taking instructions from Wouter de Swardt, a civilian with no official role in the police service?
-
Why were police officers asking Mr de Swardt questions and seeking instructions from him?
-
What official role did Mr de Swardt have, and on whose authority?
-
If Mr de Swardt had no official role, why was he present?
Choreographed Exit
-
Why did you park your car so far out in front of the property?
-
Why did you refuse the Hawks officer’s suggestion to give the accused a jacket to cover his face from the waiting media?
-
Why did you take the accused around the far side of the car rather than the near side, thereby maximizing his exposure to the waiting media?
Follow-Up Questions
-
Was the search for the safe the primary motivation for deploying the Special Task Force armed SWAT team?
-
Why, during the property search, if the search pertained to the seizure warrant, were paperwork and documentation seen and overlooked, leading those present to believe the search was for something more specific, such as the safe?
-
How did the landlord become aware of the arrest and know when to return?
-
Why did the landlord arrive just a few minutes after you took the accused away?
-
How did the landlord and his staff, who followed a few minutes after him, know in advance about the operation and that they could enter the property?
-
Who informed the landlord that the accused was being taken away, indicating the coast was clear for him to arrive?
-
On what basis and whose authority did Mr. de Swardt hand over the keys to the accused’s home, which you had handed to Mr. de Swardt just a few minutes prior?
-
Did you have, or does there exist, a court order, judgment, or ruling allowing you to evict the tenant from their home, take possession, and then transfer that possession to the owner?
-
Were you paid by Mr. de Swardt or anyone else for any part of your role in their campaign, for any work you did, or actions you took on that day, before that day, or since that day?
-
Were you promised any other inducement, such as a promotion, to assist Mr. de Swardt and/or his clients?
Other considerations and questions
Coordination and Planning
-
How was the Special Task Force deployment coordinated with the rest of the operation?
-
Were there any specific briefings or instructions given to the Special Task Force regarding their role in the operation?
-
Who was responsible for the overall coordination of the operation, including the involvement of the Special Task Force?
Communication and Information Sharing
-
How was information about the operation communicated to all involved parties, including the landlord and his staff?
-
Were there any internal communications (emails, memos, etc.) regarding the timing and execution of the operation?
-
How was the decision to inform the landlord and his staff about the operation made, and who made that decision?
Legal and Ethical Considerations
-
Were there any legal advisors consulted prior to the operation to ensure all actions were within legal boundaries?
-
Were there any ethical concerns raised by officers or other personnel about the operation? If so, how were they addressed?
-
How were the rights of the accused upheld during the operation?
Evidence Handling and Documentation
-
How was the evidence collected during the search documented and preserved?
-
Were there any discrepancies or inconsistencies in the documentation of the evidence?
-
Were any forensic analyses conducted on the evidence collected during the search?
Witnesses and Third Parties
-
Were there any witnesses or third parties present during the operation? If so, how were they handled?
-
Were any statements taken from witnesses or third parties present at the scene?
-
How were the actions of civilians, such as Mr. de Swardt and Denis Dalton, documented during the operation?
Post-Operation Review
-
Was there a debriefing or review conducted after the operation? If so, what were the findings?
-
Were any corrective actions or recommendations made following the review?
-
How were any issues or concerns raised during the review addressed?
Financial and Personal Incentives
-
Were there any financial incentives or personal benefits offered to you or any other officers involved in the operation?
-
Were there any promises of promotion or other inducements made to you or any other officers to participate in the operation?
-
How were any potential conflicts of interest managed during the operation?
Impact on the Accused
-
What was the immediate impact of the operation on the accused’s personal and professional life?
-
Were there any follow-up actions taken to address the impact on the accused?
-
How was the accused informed of their rights and the reasons for the operation?

"Justice without force is powerless; force without justice is tyrannical."
Blaise Pascal