THE DECEMBER ARREST DETENTION AS A GOAL
Arrest, Detention, Malicious Prosecution As A Goal In Itself
The December arrest had absolutely nothing to do with either an ongoing or new investigation by SAPS, and everything to do with the waants and needs of the consortium.
Even a cursery glance at the docket reveals not just how thin it was and how absent of any evidendce, but also how thbe only contrinutions were from members of the consortium, with those contribitions always clustered around their own personal timetables and needs.
Further, that there were absolutely no contirbutions from either of the inbvestigating officers eikther in the periods before or after the arrests. Nor indeed from any of the stattions and untis, incuding Belville Commerical, Camps Bay and Hout Bay.
Nor any sudden activity prior to the arrest that could indicate the arrests were linked either to the docket or any form of investigation.
What the timing of the arrests were linked to was the mosyt significant court dates inthe civil proceeedings and dirctly aligned with the precise needs of the landlords.
The Manipulation Of The Media And SAPS
The idea for the newspaper articles originated from Mr de Swardt, who motivated the involvement of News24. The information was provided by Mr de Swardt, his clients Inge and Keith Broad, their attorney, and the officers involved in the campaign. The statements by Inge Broad and Mr de Swardt were complete fabrications. The content and narrative of the articles were shaped by Mr de Swardt with specific purposes in mind, including:
-
Aiding in obtaining sanction for the unlawful arrests and the operation of December 14.
-
Attempting to sabotage bail a
-
Artificially extend the period of remand.
-
Destroying my reputation and finances.
-
Isolating me by creating a perception that I was a scammer, motivating employees, colleagues, associates, and suppliers to distance themselves from me.
-
Providing a narrative where I was the villain and the landlords, Keith and Inge Broad, were the victims, thereby justifying and excusing their unjustifiable and unlawful actions, and hiding the immoral and inexcusable motives behind them.
-
Providing what appeared to be proof of scamming t point guests towards when they arrived after my arrest
-
Recruiting the one remaining landlord to the consortium’s cause
-
Assisting Keith and Inge Broad in their attempts via the civil courts to reclaim the property
Keith Broad’s application was the primary motivator for my arrest in December. Filing his application the afternoon of the 13th December, and having me arrested the morning of the 14th December.
HOW ARREST & DETENTION WERE USED TO ADVANCE CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
The Tactical Use of Criminal Charges to Remove Opposition & Seize Assets
This timeline exposes how legal processes were manipulated to serve private interests, revealing:
✔ Arrests were strategically timed to obstruct legal defense and force unopposed rulings.
✔ Detentions ensured crucial hearings proceeded without challenge, eliminating opposition.
✔ Confiscation of documents and devices crippled any chance of appeal or rebuttal.
✔ Judicial misrepresentation framed arrests as independent events, disguising their orchestration.
✔ Key figures, including landlords and private investigators, dictated legal outcomes behind the scenes.
This document proves that criminal proceedings were not driven by legitimate investigations—but designed to serve financial motives and consolidate control.
The Primary Goal Of Remving All Opposition
Below is the most significant section of that application, where the real purpose of the articles becomes clear. The application itself is a masterclass in perjury and deception. Keith Broad was aware that if this had been a normal application with both sides present, I would have been able to disprove his many lies. The only way he could avoid exposure was to ensure I was not there and had no meaningful legal representation, which he did very effectively.
He then goes on to reference events such as the December arrest, my detention in Pollsmoor and other matters as if they were entirely unconnected, something he had simply discovered. Likewise, he references the August arrest and detention, failing to mention his involvement. He also references the articles as if he had stumbled across them with no knowledge of or role in their creation, with Inge purposely not giving her surname so that the article featuring her interview appeared unconnected to Keith Broad. All of this was premeditated.
This is a perfect example of how they were able to legitimize and give credibility to entirely false allegations. The lies began with Keith Broad and were validated and given initial credibility by the appointment of an outwardly “professional private investigator” (who knew them to be lies). This investigator then packaged up the series of fabrications as an “investigation,” feeding them amongst others to News24 and supplying a list of people for the publication to interview. These individuals were careful not to reveal their connections to each other or their true motivations. The articles were then published, leaving anyone who read them with no doubt as to their “truth.”
Similarly, the arrests, where there was no arrest warrant for the first arrest, the charges were fictional, the detention was unlawful, and the bail application was sabotaged from the outset with further lies and new fictional charges. And the December 14 operation where its unlawful arrests the illegal and secret operation at Leirmans Rd, as well as the bogus immigration charges all culminated with the magistrate throwing out the charges. However, none of this has been reported.
REASONS FOR & TIMING OF THE DECEMBER ARREST
DECEMBER ARREST: TIMED FOR PRIVATE GAIN, NOT CRIMINAL JUSTICE
30 Distinct reasons behind the December arrest proving it was a not a police-led criminal case
The table shows both the reasons for the arrest & for it's timing.
Every one of which is dictated by the needs & wants of the private individuals behind the arrests & detentions - Wouter De Swardt, Paula Disberry, Keith & Inge Broad, Raj Moonsamy, Maureen & Richard Schaffer.
All owners of the properties I transformed & they took back afterwards.
- Mapped to specific financial objectives, rental market timing & legal deadlines
- Not a police-led criminal case but a premeditated arrest by private interests, concealed behind procedural mechanisms to achieve financial & legal dominance!
The Only Hope Of Victory
To explain the logic, need, and rationale: In front of the judge is an application, effectively a dossier created by for Keith Broad by Wouter de Swardt, a “professional private investigator”, the dossier is on Keith’s opponent, , who cannot be present because he as Keith Broad has come to learn, he is in Pollsmoor prison and charged with fraud. In this dossier, the judge sees:
The August investigation – although there is no mention of the fact that there was no investigation and that Mr de Swardt had enlisted the assistance of Hout Bay SAPS, or that its author was the same Keith Broad.
The August arrest – although it does not mention who laid the false charges (Keith and Inge Broad).
The August bail application – although it does not mention the outcome or Keith Broad’s role.
The August criminal case – although it does not mention its outcome or Keith Broad’s role.
The theft charge and the allegation of stolen items – although it does not mention that not only had the charges been thrown out, but I, Inge Broad, my attorneys, her attorney, and the investigating officer had visited the storage unit in September, inside which were all the contents from the back room, (which they knew anyway). And all Inge Broad had to say was “where is the old office printer”. Not even any pretence to look for the gold, cash or Krugerrands they lied and said were in amongst the junk.
The protection order – although it does not mention that it was obtained by Keith Broad perjuring himself, lying that he lived in the property, not me, and that they were my thugs, not his.
The malicious prosecution by PD – although it does not mention that Keith Broad and Paula Disberry were working together long before that point, or that the charge was a legal impossibility, that the warrant officer had closed the docket, or that Mr de Swardt had ensured it remained “live.”
The December arrest – although it does not mention that the same Keith Broad instructed the arrest, or the true motivation, the fact that there was no viable docket, and the failure to get arrest and seizure warrants.
The December charges – although it does not mention that the charges were thrown out by the prosecution at first sight.
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: Arrests Charges, Media24, Civil Court Dates, Illegal & The Three Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign
Belville Commercial Crime Unit
The Bellville investigation that resulted in the December arrest – although it does not mention that there had been no activity on it by the investigating officer since he was appointed, and none by any investigating officer in the year to that point, and that the only activity had been by one Paula Disberry back in June. Or that Keith Broad was the reason that docket even existed.
The immigration charge that Sergeant Stevens added after all the charges had been withdrawn – although it does not mention that the charge was bogus, factually untrue, and an impossibility.
My visa extensions or alleged lack thereof – although there is no mention that they knew the statement about my visa extensions was a lie, as they were in possession of my passport.
My immigration status – although it does not mention that my immigration status had been compromised by Keith Broad and others when they stole and illegally kept my passport.
The petition created by MB, DD, and JH – although it does not mention that these were the very same people who worked with and for Mr de Swardt and Keith Broad, who were at my home on December 14 and were part of the illegal operation at Leirmans Road. Nor does it mention that they were using the petition to help divert blame away from the scam villa enterprise they set up.
The court case between PD and myself over 12 Hove Road, - although not mentioning it was settled by both parties five months earlier
References to “victims” of the alleged scam, who arrived after the arrest – although not mentioning the fact the only reason those guest arrived was because Mr de Swardt., Serg Stevens, Keith Broad purposely kept the platform ignorant that the villas were no longer under my control
As well as:
The various articles that were published – although it does not mention that Keith Broad and Mr de Swardt had authored them, motivated the involvement of News24, and micromanaged each article, providing those to be interviewed.
Including the lengthy News24 article that featured an interview with an “Inge” – although it does not mention that she was the wife of Keith Broad.
THE "DOCKET"
[Taken from the table of activity on the docket detailing all contributions]
Below is a breakdown of all activity on the docket, catagorising the contributions and occasions when they added to the docket. Whereas in any legitimate police investigation and most especially one for fraud there would be hundreds of occasions the docket was added to, in this instance they can be counted on one hand. Furthwer, there was not a single contirbutions from the police themselves and of special note, nothinbg from wither investigating officer or any of the sttations or units charged with the investigation.
'Investigating officer Duna'
'Investigating officer Stevens'
'Belville Commercial'
Hout Bay SAPS
Camps Bay SAPS
Cybercrime unit
Paarl SAPS
Saps other
Consortium
Other
New cases referenced in Media24 articles
Saps:> 3 months prior Dec-22 arrest
Saps: > 3 months prior Aug-22 arrest
Saps: > 3 months prior March-22 charges
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
TWO
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
Procedural paperwork
False affidavits
3rd party evidence. 'Saps'
3rd party 'consortium'
3rd party 'other'
Internal seizure warrant
Magistrates’ seizure warrant
Warrants of arrest December
Warrants of arrest August
Warrants of arrest March
Charges re 4 August
Charges re 14 December
Charges re 13 March
FOUR
THREE
NONE
SIX
NONE
ONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
NONE
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: Arrests Charges, Media24, Civil Court Dates, Illegal & The Three Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign
Every Case Listed, Not One Outcome Included
Every case was listed, but without any reference to the outcomes. The articles were listed, but without any context or insight into how they had been motivated to articles in the first place. And failing to mention the most significant contribution was from the applicant’s wife.
Added to this were repeats of the same lies told since the outset:-
Misrepresenting the extensive improvement works that I had done to the property, as “malicious tenant damage” – but failing it mention that as a result of the work I did to the property just a few days after my arrest, Keith Broad had it advertised at R13 million more than its value of just a year earlier
And lying by saying he neither knew of or consented to my renting out the property - failing to mention that was the sole basis on which the agreement was reached, that he had never once raised that as an issue when the respective attornyes were communicating, that his agent Rawsons had actually provided an affidavit in the spoliation proceedings confirming that it was a fundamental part of the agreement, that it was Keith Broad’s proposal in the first pace and one that was never raised as an issue outside of Keith Broads eviction proceedings.
Even listing the period August to November as rent arrears despite the fact that as a result of Keith Broad’s perjury, the protection order he obtained excluded me from going within 500 meter of the property
And further listed rent arears for the period of December to February, during which time I was in Pollsmoor thanks to the same Keith Broad, failing to mention that Mr de Swardt had actually taken possession of the property o14 December as a result of his illegal and secret raid and arrest, and handed keys and possession to the owner that same day, and even had the attorney stand up on court to tell the magistrate that he should not allow me to list the property as my bail address as it was now in the possession of the owners who would physically block me from returning.
Most disturbing was the inclusion of the dossier of Mr de Swardt that listed every group of guests who turned up to check in after the arrest – failing to include in that dossier or tell the judge that the reason those guests had turned up in the first place Was because Mr de Swardt, Keith Broad, Serg Stevens and SAPS had purposely not told them I no longer had possession or control of the villas, precisely so that guest would turn up to find themselves homes. Failing also to take tell the judge that they failed to contact the platform after each set of guests arrived and failing to tell the judge that they steered the guests away from contacting the platform or credit card company and instead towards laying criminal charges.
Further misrepresenting to the judge that I had taken the bookings on Keith’s property within right to do so, failing to mention the properties were mine to do so at the point of taking the booking
FACT FILES: EXPOSING THE LIES, REVEALING THE TRUTH
In September 2021, impressed by my success in Camps Bay, agent Gail Broad offered me a lease on 16 Leirmans Road, a Llandudno villa owned by her cousin, Keith Broad.
The agreement was to renovate the property to attract high-end tourists, with a five-year lease ensuring I could recover my investment and earn a profit.
The Illusion of Independence
The spread of the material provided and the fact that none of it seemed connected to Keith Broad allowed him to present it as credible and independent evidence of my conduct. By recycling the fabrications through various mediums, he was able to give lies legitimacy.
What they did was very effectively launder their lies. The laundering itself, by virtue of the articles, the police officers, and the criminal justice system, allowed them to present these lies as facts, which they did very effectively.
Your article is a perfect example. As mentioned, the article is particularly damaging because it lends credibility to a completely false narrative. The irony is that it was the same false narrative that was the root cause of the assumption and article to begin with.
This demonstrates the power and purpose of recycling fabrications until they achieve credibility.
Every single event, document, action, article, or matter that was used against me and is encapsulated in Keith Broad’s application leads back to the very same authors, and without exception. Yet none had his fingerprints or name appear on them.
By rewriting the facts and history, the success of this approach is evident. At the end of the laundering process, anyone reading the articles or seeing the dossier of Mr de Swardt would conclude that I am clearly the villain, and they are clearly the victims. This was only possible with the help of the SAPS officers, the news publication, and the journalists.
To maintain that position requires the truth to remain hidden and the journalists to remain silent.
Media24’s False and Fabricated Articles vs the Facts and the Truth
MEDIA24
FALSE:
"Inge (surname withheld) told News24 it was heartbreaking and frustrating to see what was done to her and her husband’s luxury property on the Atlantic seaboard."
TRUE:
They called it “heartbreaking.” But what’s truly heartbreaking is being stripped of your freedom, denied bail, and blocked from accessing your own home by the very people who stole it. Heartbreaking is living in fear cancer will kill your mother before you see her again. Heartbreaking is clawing through two years of lies, theft, and cover-ups —only to see the criminals walk free, posing for media interviews, while the real victim is left fighting for justice with nothing but mouldy clothes and a debt to his mother.
Use Of The Fabricated Dossier
However, as convincing as the dossier was, to successfully use the fabricated and misrepresented dossier necessitated that the fundamental deceit be maintained. This would only be possible if the application were a unilateral one, something that is by definition impossible in litigation when you have two litigating parties. Unless that is you have no opponent, or your opponent is unable to provide a defense or rebuttal.
The lies were so blatant that how knew I would be able to expose each one, and if I did, not only would he lose that application highly likely any that followed as his extensive perjury would be exposed at the same time
Hence the arrest to remove me, the detention to keep me removed, and the confiscation of my equipment, data, and documents. This meant I would not be an opponent in any regard, and even if I had been aware of the litigation and theoretically able to do something about it, my imprisonment and the loss of all my data made the already near-impossible task of instructing attorneys and briefing them in complex litigation from Pollsmoor entirely impossible.
So, no defendant, no data, no documents, which meant no ability to appoint someone in my place to take that data and make a best effort. And no one to expose the complete fabrications and distortions that made up that application.
EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNT LEIRMANS RD HOUSEKEEPER
"This paragraph is a temporary placeholder for the final caption. The full explanatory text will be inserted here once reviewed and confirmed. Please do not treat this as live content. This paragraph is a temporary placeholder for the final caption. The full explanatory text will be inserted here once reviewed and confirmed. Please do not treat this as live content.
[This paragraph is a temporary placeholder for the final caption. The full explanatory text will be inserted here once reviewed and confirmed. Please do not treat this as live content."
KEITH BROAD'S ATTEMPT TO OVERTURN THE DECISIONOF 5 DECEMBER 2022, AND RAILROAD HIS EVICTION APLICATION THROUGH THE CIVIL COURT UNOPPOSED.
Notice Of Set Down Keith Broad Appeal Submitted 13 Dec 2022.
Keith Broad's submissions were not only skewed or misrepresented, but also contained dozens of entirely false statements and numerous completely fabricated allegations. To demonstrate the completely false nature of his application and to prove the statements contained in ours, we applied to the High Court in November for permission to introduce oral evidence. This would require all evidence to be tested in court, including cross examination.
The High Court issued its decision on December 5, 2022, and we won the application, with the High Court agreeing to allow the admission of oral evidence. As a result, the matter was pushed back six months, to April 2023.
This was an obvious setback for Keith and Inge Broad.
Both because the introduction of oral evidence would expose his fabrications, and the fact that the option to retake the property 'legally' would not even be a possibility for six months. Keith and Inge Broad had already cost themselves 6 months by pushing back the hearing from mid-2022 to November so they could pursue the cheaper, faster, and illegal routes to take back the property.
After failing in various illegal methods and criminal acts during the months of July, August, and September, he turned to civil courts for help. With no qualms about switching between 'legal' and illegal methods as needed.
The application was submitted on December 13th, and the arrest occurred the following morning.
The timing was not coincidental, as one of the purposes of the arrest was to remove his opponent, and the seizure of all devices, data, and documents denied the opponent access to the information required to mount a defence and made instructing an attorney extremely difficult.
Keith Broad then proceeded to rush the application through while his opponent was incarcerated, including evidence in the court bundle that was a complete fabrication, knowing there would be no opponent to expose it in court.]
KEITH BROAD DECEMBER 13 APPLICATION. PAGE 60
KB: “Before I deal with the procedural irregularities and, with respect, the fatal defects of the Respondent's application, I believe it prudent to address the events which have transpired since the last date this matter was enrolled for hearing (8 November 2022), which events are directly related to the purpose of this application and the relief sought by the First Applicant”.
KB introduces the matters for which he is entirely responsible as if these events have “transpired” entirely independently of him, his wife, WDS, YY etc. Failing to disclose to the courts that he was the author of what he introduces to the courts as events relevant to is application but unrelated to him
KB fails to mention that he was responsible for the second arrest, fails to mention he was the reason I was sent to Pollsmoor, and fails to mention that his and WDS’s proxy YY was the reason I was still in Pollsmoor, and was busy trying to extend remand so he could push this very application through the courts
“7.1.1. This property is owned by the Letchme Trust, who have experienced similar issues with the Respondent as in casu.
KB fails to mention that the owner of the Letchme Trust is one Ragi Moonsamy, the other landlords would was responsible for the illegal evictions of 14 December, who walked back into his property and took possession of the keys a few minutes after I had been taken away.
KEITH BROAD DECEMBER 13 APPLICATION. PAGE 61
7.2. The Respondent's ball application was set down on 6 January 2023, and was then postponed to 2 February 2023 as a result of the Respondent being unable to produce a valid place of residence.
KB fails to mention that he and Moonsamy were the reason I could not produce a bail address, having had their attorney inform the magistrate I would not be allowed back into either of my two properties, despite them having absolutely no right to do so.
7.3. This is the Respondent's second arrest since he was released on bail on 22 August 2022 (CAS No.: 94/07/2022). Despite his release, the Respondent clearly continued with his alleged crimes / unlawful conduct which ultimately resulted in his arrest.
Again, KB fails to mention that he was responsible for the first arrest and that the matter had been thrown out, or his role in the second arrest. Further failing to mention that all parties had visited the storage unit after obtaining bail to demonstrate its existence and ensure the docket was closed. Which SAPS conveniently failed to do.
7.4. I have come to learn of the various open cases against the Respondent (both civil matters and criminal). I attach hereto a document listing the open cases / charges against the Respondent, and the respective Case / CAS numbers, marked as "KB3".
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the cases listed. Which by that point each one that had been tested, eg in court had been thoroughly discredited and thrown out. Just as the case rated to the December arrest would be. Although not until it was too late t mount a defense to KB’s application.
7.4.1. As will be noted from the contents therein, there are 9 criminal cases opened against the Respondent, 8 of which relate to charges of fraud for his 'business' activities and two of the 8 for damage to property.
7.4.2. There are further 6 civil cases / harassment applications against the Respondent.
KB also fails to mention that “harassment” case was brought by him, was based entirely on perjury and was a stunt to assist in his attempt to sabotage the High Court spoliation proceedings
KEITH BROAD DECEMBER 13 APPLICATION. PAGE 62
The Respondent is further being Investigated as to whether he is an illegal immigrant.
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for that situation, for the theft of both passports, the sabotage of the visa extensions. All of it aided by SAPS, and more especially YY and SD
7.5. The author of the aforementioned document is Mr. Wouter de Swardt, the private investigator I appointed. I shall ensure a confirmatory affidavit deposed to by Mr De Swardt is filed prior to the hearing of this application.
An explicit reference to the dossier produced by WDS for use in these very proceedings. Using the arrest of December as the main event. This dossier was the closest thing to a docket we had seen and it was both astonishing and outrageous that YY had cooperated to such a degree with WDS, KB et al and that KB had more information available to him than we were ever given
7.6. Since the Respondent's arrest, various news articles have been published which neatly summarise the Respondent's modus operandi. I attach hereto, the following:
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the articles that the interviews were with those very same people, that the contents were complete fabrications or any reference to he relationship between WDS and News24
KEITH BROAD DECEMBER 13 APPLICATION. PAGE 63
7.6.1. IOL Article titled "I almost got scammed by Darren Russell - the alleged Cape Town Airbnb swindler" dated 16 January 2023, marked as "KB4";
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the articles that the interviews were with those very same people, that the contents were complete fabrications or any reference to he relationship between WDS and News24
7.6.2. News24 Article by Carin Smith titled "Second arrest for Cape Town luxury accommodation 'scammer' suspected of pocketing millions" dated 14 January 2023, marked as "KB5";
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the articles that the interviews were with those very same people, that the contents were complete fabrications or any reference to he relationship between WDS and News24
7.6.3. Netwerk24 Article by Maygene de Wee titled "Brit wéér in Kaap aangekeer ná verhuurslenter" dated 17 December 2022, marked as "KB6";
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, were responsible for all of the articles that the interviews were with those very same people, that the contents were complete fabrications or any reference to he relationship between WDS and News24
7.6.4. There was further an online petition started by a Mario Boffa, on change.org, titled "Let's STOP Darren Russell de Rodez aka La Collection The Holiday SCAMMER British Citizen", a screenshot of the website petition is attached hereto, marked as "KB7",
Again, KB fails to mention that WDS and his clients, the very same landlords, along with Denis Dalton and Johan Schalkwyk had threatened Mario Boffa, just a they had done with Chandre Abrahams, failing also to mention Mr Boffa’s key role in the embezzlement f over a million rand, the scam operation he , Denis Dalton and Johan Schalkwyk set up afterwards, or their role in the arrest, or their role in the illegal operation at 16 Leirmans
The Purpose And Use Of The Articles
While I do not claim that Media24 was aware of the ultimate purpose or planned use of the articles when they published them, I am confident that WdS framed, motivated, and presented the articles with very clear intentions. His subsequent use of these publications served as proof of those intentions.
Compensating for the Lack of Evidence:
The articles published by News24, Netwerk24, and Rapport served a purpose beyond reporting. At the time, the Consortium, led by Keith and Inge Broad and WdS, faced insurmountable challenges in achieving their agenda through legal channels due to a lack of actual evidence.
Previous attempts by Keith Broad to introduce accusations in court failed under judicial scrutiny, as these allegations lacked substance. Recognizing that courts require evidence to substantiate claims, the Consortium pivoted to the media, specifically toward a publication WdS felt he could influence, as a platform where scrutiny might be less rigorous, and where allegations—however unfounded—could be presented as fact.
This shift allowed them to fill the gaps in their case with fabricated narratives absent the burden of cross-examination. While courts demand a high standard of evidence, journalistic integrity also requires similar rigor, including verification and fact-checking. The apparent lack of such measures in these publications enabled WdS to advance unsubstantiated claims unchallenged.
THE IMPOSIBILITY OF COINCIDENCE
Direct Correlation: Arrests Charges, Media24, Civil Court Dates, Illegal & The Three Key Civil Court Dates
The absolute and undeniable precise alignment between the needs and strategy of the landlords and the key events and dates of the campaign
THE DECEMBER ARREST'S PERFECT ALIGNMENT
The Timing And Motives Behind The December Arrest
The December 14, 2022, arrest was not the result of any SAPS investigation or legitimate legal process. It was a meticulously planned operation, orchestrated by private individuals, including Rago Moonsamy (owner of Fisherman’s Bend) and Keith Broad/IB (owners of 16 Leirmans Road), and executed through their proxies, Wouter de Swardt and Sergeant Stevens. This arrest served overlapping strategic and financial goals for the landlords and their associates. The timing, motives, and outcomes demonstrate a convergence of events that defies coincidence and highlights deliberate intent.
The date of the arrest was carefully chosen to align with multiple strategic objectives, ensuring maximum disruption to my legal defense and financial stability. Key events leading up to and surrounding the arrest reveal the precision of this timing:
The Date Of The Arrest's Direct Corrolation With The Landlord's Needs
Sergeant Stevens was fully aware of where the instruction to arrest had come from and why. The arrest and date were instructed to serve several needs and wants.
The date of the arrest in itself shows the instruction to arrest came from outside of SAPS and from within the group. To suggest otherwise would be to ignore all the facts and suggest a coincidence of lottery winning odds. Below are thirty reasons both for the consortium instructing the arrest be executed and for the date which was chosen. Every one of the below can easily be interpedently corroborated.
The below diagram visually represents the above list of the landlords wants and needs and the convergence of those. All of which cluster and converge exactly on the date of the arrest.
When you consider that this table on shows November/December, and there was two years of occupation prior to and a further three years afterwards, so there is absolutely no chance that Serg Stevens can pretend this was just one gigantic coincidence
To suggest that the motivation and instruction to arrest came from within SAPS is demonstrably untrue
The Truth Suid Afrika
Discover the untold stories behind the false headlines of the Media24 articles. Uncover the truth behind the fabricated content of those articles. Understand the motivation that powered the consortium's actions.
"Justice that love gives is a surrender, justice that law gives is a punishment." Mahatma Gandhi