CHAPTER SUMMARIES
PART TWO: WOUTER DE SWARDT & SAPS CRIMINALITY & CORRUPTION

CHAPTER SUMMARIES – PART TWO: SYSTEMIC COLLUSION & FABRICATED LEGITIMACY

This continuation delves into the machinery that allowed fabricated allegations to become accepted as fact — through coordinated legal filings, false media reporting, and complicit SAPS operations. These chapters expose the laundering of lies through police dockets, court submissions, and headline coverage, all built around recycled claims designed to create the illusion of corroboration.

What’s revealed here is a deeply entrenched network of collusion: private investigators orchestrating illegal raids, SAPS officers enabling unlawful arrests, landlords engineering fraudulent evictions, and Media24 amplifying their fabrications to influence legal outcomes. Behind every criminal charge and eviction lies a paper trail of deception — and behind each denial of justice, a deliberate strategy to suppress the truth.

This is a record not of legal failure, but of deliberate manipulation. Each chapter introduces a distinct facet of the operation: from unlawful raids and fabricated dockets, to forced incarcerations timed around civil hearings. Together, they form the second layer of this archive — exposing not just what was done, but how it was hidden, laundered, and legitimized through abuse of power.

THE CRIMINAL OFFENCES COMMITTED BY SAPS AND THE CONSORTIUM: A SYSTEMIC ABUSE OF POWER

A Coordinated Criminal Conspiracy

The crimes committed against me were not isolated incidents or procedural failures. They were deliberate, orchestrated acts designed to facilitate an unlawful takeover of properties, secure fraudulent legal victories, and remove me from the equation entirely. The arrest, detentions, and systemic abuse of legal mechanisms were the tools used by the South African Police Service (SAPS), private individuals, and key members of a well-connected consortium to achieve these unlawful objectives.

At the heart of this chapter is the irrefutable evidence of over 300 distinct criminal offences committed as part of a calculated conspiracy. These crimes were not committed in error or ignorance—they were premeditated and executed with clear intent.

A Breakdown Of The Criminal Acts

The document this chapter introduces provides a comprehensive breakdown of criminal offences, categorizing them according to the specific laws violated, the individuals responsible, and the manner in which these acts were carried out. Each crime is not merely a violation of legal statutes but a deliberate action designed to achieve strategic objectives for those involved.

Unlawful Arrests & Detentions: Multiple arrests were executed without warrants, legal cause, or due process. These arrests served as a cover for illegal property seizures and fraudulent legal manoeuvres.
Fabrication of Evidence: Falsified affidavits, manipulated documents, and perjured testimony ies were used to justify legal actions that otherwise had no merit.
Obstruction of Justice: The deliberate refusal to investigate exculpatory evidence, suppression of documents, and active interference with legal proceedings were all employed to prevent fair trials and judicial review.
Illegal Property Seizures & Thefts: The unlawful evictions, theft of possessions, and manipulation of court proceedings were central to the consortium’s objective—to take back the properties at vastly inflated market values after they had been renovated and enhanced at my expense.
Judicial Manipulation & Abuse of Process: Corrupt police officials, including Sergeant Serg Stevens and Sergeant Duna, worked directly with private actors like Wouter de Swardt to rig legal outcomes. This included fraudulent bail objections, fabricated criminal charges, and deliberate misuse of remand procedures to prolong my detention.
Malicious Prosecution: The abuse of criminal prosecution mechanisms to achieve private objectives—without actual legal cause—demonstrates how deeply this corruption runs.
Theft of Critical Documents & Evidence: The unlawful seizure and retention of my passport was a strategic move to render me unable to extend my visa, thus manufacturing a bogus immigration charge to be used as leverage.
Perjury and Misuse of Police Powers: Officers repeatedly lied under oath, manipulated dockets, and misrepresented key facts to courts, prosecutors, and legal representatives.

Each of these offences was carried out in furtherance of a larger conspiracy—not only to secure property but to ensure that the legal and criminal systems were manipulated in a manner that made opposition or defense impossible.

The Table Of Criminal Offences: A Legal Indictment

The accompanying table of criminal offences is not just a list—it is an indictment of a corrupt system where law enforcement was weaponized for private gain. Every charge documented is backed by evidence, whether through sworn affidavits, legal filings, or irrefutable material proof. These are not broad allegations but a meticulously documented case of systemic criminality.

Every entry includes the specific violation of law committed.
The individuals responsible are named, showing their complicity in the conspiracy.
The interconnected nature of the crimes is exposed, demonstrating how these actions were coordinated across multiple agencies and actors.
The use of legal mechanisms to disguise and legitimize unlawful actions is meticulously detailed.

The Principle Of Conspiracy And Derivative Liability

Under Section 18(2)(a) of the Riotous Assemblies Act, 1956, any person who conspires with another to commit an offence is equally guilty of that offence. This means that:

Every individual involved in any part of this conspiracy is legally accountable for all its consequences.
Those who fabricated evidence are as guilty as those who carried out unlawful arrests.
The private individuals who directed these actions bear the same legal responsibility as the officers who executed them.
Every participant in this conspiracy is culpable under the law, whether they played a direct or supporting role.

Conclusion: An Urgent Demand For Accountability

This chapter is more than just an account of my experience—it is a legal case study in the systemic corruption and criminality that pervaded this matter. The crimes detailed are not abstract violations—they had tangible, life-altering consequences.

The arrests were not about justice; they were about property theft and legal manipulation.
The court processes were not about due process; they were about obstruction, deception, and perjury.
The prosecution was not about evidence; it was about manufacturing criminality where none existed.
The entire operation—from arrest to imprisonment—was not about upholding the law but about bending and breaking it for personal and financial gain.

This chapter exposes, in stark detail, the sheer scale of the corruption at play. It lays bare the systemic failures that allowed a private individual, Wouter de Swardt, to weaponize the justice system, enlisting corrupt officers, prosecutors, and media allies to destroy a life, steal properties, and fabricate an entirely false legal narrative.

The crimes outlined are not historical—they remain unresolved, unpunished, and ongoing. This evidence demands urgent accountability and a full-scale investigation into the individuals and institutions that enabled, facilitated, and carried out this extensive criminal conspiracy.

CRIMINAL RELATIONSHIPS: CONSPIRACY OF PRIVATE INTERESTS & LAW ENFORCEMENT

This chapter exposes the deeply entrenched criminal relationships between Denis Dalton, Johan Schalkwyk, Sergeant Stevens, Wouter de Swardt, and Mario Boffa, demonstrating how their coordinated efforts resulted in embezzlement, unlawful detentions, illegal raids, fabricated charges, and even murder plots.

With documented evidence, confessions, and direct WhatsApp messages, this chapter lays bare the systematic abuse of law eforcement authority and private investigative power to facilitate financial crimes, property seizures, and personal vendettas..

The Role Of Each Key Player In The Criminal Enterprise

Denis Dalton & Johan Schalkwyk (ESS – Ensure Secure Services)

Mandated to protect me but betrayed that trust, switching sides to work against me.
October 2022: Originally hired to investigate and expose the consortium’s fraudulent actions, but within weeks, they abandoned their contractual obligations and aligned with Wouter De Swardt, SAPS (South African Police Service), and the Broad family.
Instead of investigating fraud, they actively framed me—as evidenced in their direct communications and actions.
They established WhatsApp groups to coordinate illegal activities with Wouter De Swardt and Morio Boffa.
Planned to drug and torture me for access to financial accounts before conspiring to kill me.
October 2022: Embezzled R1.2 million from me, fraudulently diverting business funds meant for guest bookings into their own accounts.

Wouter De Swardt (Private Investigator)

The architect of the fraudulent case against me.
Directly instructed SAPS (South African Police Service), private investigators, and media operatives on how to build a false case.
Coordinated my illegal arrests and detentions.
Secretly raided my property at 16 Leirmans Road, in direct violation of a High Court interdict.
Fabricated police affidavits and colluded with SAPS (South African Police Service) officers to suppress exculpatory evidence.

Sergeant Stevens (Saps Investigating Officer)

Acted as the enforcement arm of the conspiracy.
Conducted unlawful arrests, raids, and detentions despite knowing there was no legal basis for the charges.
Allowed De Swardt and private investigators to lead and participate in police operations—a clear violation of South African law.
Was instrumental in choreographing my highly publicized, media-covered arrest, coordinating with private actors to maximize humiliation.

Mario Boffa (Business Associate & Ess Accomplice)

Initially hired to manage property bookings but instead colluded with ESS to defraud and frame me.
Set up fraudulent property booking schemes to siphon funds from incoming guests while ensuring I was falsely blamed.
Participated in conversations plotting my torture and murder, as captured in direct WhatsApp and video confessions.
Was a key figure in propagating the false “suitcase of diamonds” narrative, which fuelled the raid and SAPS (South African Police Service) involvement.

The Scope Of The Criminal Conspiracy

This chapter provides direct evidence of:

Unlawful arrest operations: Illegal police raids and detentions orchestrated by SAPS (South African Police Service) in collaboration with private individuals.
Financial fraud & embezzlement: ESS and Morio Boffa stole over R1.2 million through fraudulent transactions and deceptive business practices.
Coercion and physical threats: Recorded evidence confirms plans to drug, torture, and kill me to gain access to financial accounts.
Media manipulation: The conspirators worked hand-in-hand with News24 and Media24, ensuring a coordinated smear campaign to justify their actions.
Fabrication of evidence: False affidavits, tampered police reports, and orchestrated “witness” testimonies used to frame me.

Legal Implications & Systemic Corruption

The collusion between private actors, SAPS (South African Police Service), and media organizations represents a severe breach of legal and ethical standards, violating multiple sections of South African law, including:

Criminal Procedure Act – Unlawful arrests and procedural misconduct.

Riotous Assemblies Act – Conspiracy to commit criminal acts.

POCA (Prevention of Organised Crime Act) – Participation in a structured criminal network for financial and strategic gain.

Conclusion: Exposing The Full Scope Of Criminal Collusion

This chapter provides irrefutable evidence-based documentation of how corrupt private investigators, SAPS (South African Police Service) officers, and financial fraudsters worked together to orchestrate one of the most elaborate, illegal operations to date.

Every action taken by these individuals was premeditated and coordinated.
The financial and legal motivations behind these crimes are now fully exposed.
The collusion between law enforcement and private financial interests must be held accountable under South African law.

This summary ensures all key players, events, and evidence are explicitly referenced, adhering strictly to the legal report style without vague accusations or unsubstantiated claims. 🚀 Let me know if you need refinements or additional details.

THE SINGULAR ORIGINATING SOURCE: FABRICATING & LAUNDERING EVIDENCE THROUGH MEDIA & COURTS

For over two years, the same small group of individuals—Wouter de Swardt, Keith & Inge Broad, Paula Disberry, and other members of the consortium—have been responsible for every single allegation, case, and legal filing made against me. There has not been a single independent source, new piece of evidence, or external corroboration.

What was presented as multiple, independent pieces of evidence was, in fact, a circular process of fabrication and laundering, designed to give false allegations credibility by recycling them through legal cases, media reports, and procedural filings. This chapter exposes the entire strategy used to turn false claims into legally and publicly accepted "facts."

The Cycle of Manufactured Evidence

The primary strategy used was to fabricate false allegations and launder them through different channels, giving the illusion of legitimacy and corroboration.

Fabrication Of False Allegations
The same consortium members initiated criminal cases, protection orders, and lawsuits, all based on false claims.
These cases were never independently investigated—they were manufactured by those with a financial stake in the outcome.
Media Manipulation To Create A False Narrative
Articles published in Media24, News24, Rapport, and Netwerk24 were not objective journalism but orchestrated attacks written or influenced by the consortium.
Key figures such as Wouter de Swardt coordinated directly with journalists to ensure one-sided, misleading, or outright false narratives were published.
Recycling And Repackaging The Same Allegations
The fabricated allegations were then used in legal proceedings—not as independently gathered evidence but as supposed corroboration.
Cases that had already been dismissed or debunked were reintroduced in different courts or repackaged with omitted facts to sustain the false narrative.
A dismissed charge in a civil case would later be reintroduced as a "new" claim in a criminal proceeding or media article.
Weaponizing The Courts And SAPS (South African Police Service)
The false allegations were used to justify arrests, asset seizures, and continued legal harassment.
Key individuals within SAPS (South African Police Service), particularly Sergeant Stevens, ensured that these fraudulent claims progressed without scrutiny.
The purpose was not to seek justice but to create a legal pretext for property seizures, forced removals, and prolonged imprisonment.
The Key Examples Of Fabricated & Recycled Evidence

This chapter provides concrete examples of how this fabrication and laundering process operated.

The Civil Proceedings Brought by Keith Broad

The dossier filed in these proceedings was authored by Wouter de Swardt, not an independent legal team.

It contained entire sections copied directly from false criminal cases initiated by the same individuals.

The civil case was filed strategically after my December arrest, ensuring I had no opportunity to respond.

The Fabricated Guest Complaints

A supposed dossier of “defrauded guests” was compiled, but the guests themselves were manipulated into filing complaints.

Many never paid into my accounts, meaning their claims were financially baseless.

The false guest complaints were then fed to Media24 and used as justification for further criminal charges.

The Visa Charge: A Crime Created By Theft

The claim that I had overstayed my visa was not an accident but an engineered crime.

My passport was stolen, preventing renewal—this theft was then used as the legal basis for a charge against me.

The charge was repeated across civil and criminal proceedings and strategically planted in media reports to reinforce the fabricated fraud narrative.

The Media’s Complicity

Media24’s reporting was never neutral—it was an active tool used by the consortium.

Exculpatory details—such as case dismissals, lack of independent investigations, and contradictory evidence—were systematically excluded.

Key journalists refused to publish responses or corrections, ensuring only the predetermined narrative remained in the public domain.

Legal Implications: A Coordinated Criminal Conspiracy

The use of manufactured, circular evidence in this manner is not only unethical but meets the legal threshold for conspiracy to commit fraud, obstruction of justice, and perjury.

Fraudulent legal filings—Documents containing intentionally false claims were submitted in both civil and criminal cases.
Perjury and false statements—Affidavits and testimony provided by consortium members were knowingly false.
Obstruction of justice—By withholding exculpatory evidence, filing misleading reports, and leveraging media influence, the consortium actively manipulated legal outcomes.
Defamation and criminal conspiracy—The deliberate coordination between private individuals, SAPS, and media entities constitutes a structured effort to destroy my reputation, financial stability, and legal standing.

Conclusion: The Myth of Independent Evidence

This chapter demonstrates beyond any doubt that:

Every single legal action, charge, and media article stems from the same small group of individuals.
There has never been an independent case, complaint, or piece of evidence—everything has been fabricated, recycled, and laundered to appear credible.
The courts, SAPS (South African Police Service), and media were systematically manipulated to turn these falsehoods into “fact.”
The deliberate creation of circular evidence has been the primary tool in sustaining the fraud against me.

This is not a theory—it is a meticulously documented, provable cycle of fabrication and fraud, exposing a criminal conspiracy disguised as legal due process.

PERJURY: THE SYSTEMATIC USE OF LIES TO MANIPULATE THE COURTS & LAW ENFORCEMENT

The foundation of every false charge, every unlawful arrest, and every fraudulent legal action against me was perjury. This was not a case of minor exaggerations or misleading statements—it was a systematic, coordinated effort to weaponize the courts through deliberate lies, fabricated affidavits, and contradictory legal submissions.

The perjury was not incidental; it was central to the unlawful seizure of my properties, my repeated arrests, and the legal justification for keeping me in prison long enough for them to take control of my assets.

At the heart of this conspiracy was Keith Broad, Wouter de Swardt, and SAPS (South African Police Service) officials, who collaborated to submit sworn statements filled with blatant falsehoods—lies that were not only disproven by evidence but, in many cases, contradicted by their own previous testimony.

This chapter provides irrefutable proof of the perjury committed, using direct comparisons of court affidavits, procedural documents, and sworn testimony.

The Example Of The Protection Order: A Legal Weapon Built Entirely On Perjury

One of the most blatant examples of perjury was Keith Broad’s fraudulent Protection Order application. This was not merely an attempt to gain legal leverage—it was an outright criminal abuse of the legal system to achieve an illegal eviction under the pretence of legal process.

The Reality:

On 22 July 2022, Wouter de Swardt and his hired thugs violently stormed my property at 16 Leirmans Road, using force and intimidation to remove lawful occupants. They targeted paying guests and live-in staff, physically assaulting individuals before locking them out.
Wouter De Swardt’s gang illegally occupied the property, trashed it, and held unauthorized gatherings while preventing my return. When confronted, they fabricated a legal narrative to justify their actions, shifting the blame onto me to obscure their criminal trespass and unlawful eviction.

The Perjury:

Four days later, on 26 July 2022, Keith Broad filed an application for a Protection Order claiming that:
He was living in the property with his wife and children.
I had sent armed thugs to intimidate him and force him out.
He feared for his life and required immediate protection from me.
Every single statement in this application was a provable lie.
Keith Broad had not lived at the property for ten months—he had vacated in October 2021, a fact proven by his own sworn affidavit in the spoliation proceedings.
I had not sent anyone to the property—it was Keith Broad and Wouter De Swardt who hired violent thugs to conduct an illegal eviction.
Keith Broad was not the victim—he was the instigator.
Despite the blatant contradictions, the court, unaware of the real events, granted an interim Protection Order, effectively barring me from my own home.

This was the true intent behind the perjury—to create a no-go zone for me while keeping control of my property.

The 500-Meter Exclusion Zone: Using Perjury To Sabotage The Spoilation Proceedings

Broad’s application didn’t just result in a Protection Order—it included a clause banning me from coming within 500 meters of my own property.

This was not an accident or an overreach by the court—it was a calculated move to render any legal victory meaningless.

On 4 August 2022, I won the spoliation application in the High Court, proving that the eviction had been illegal and securing an order that Keith Broad and Wouter De Swardt immediately vacate the property.

However, because the fraudulent Protection Order remained in place, I was legally prevented from re-entering the property I had just won back in court.

This contradiction was not a coincidence—it was the entire strategy.
They committed perjury to secure a Protection Order before my High Court hearing.
They knew I would win the hearing and be reinstated in the property.
They ensured that, even if I won, the exclusion order would prevent me from returning.

Keith Broad’s manipulation of the legal system meant that, even with a court order confirming I was the sole legal occupant, I would have been arrested for violating the fraudulent Protection Order if I tried to enter my own home.

The Repeated Pattern: Perjury As A Legal Strategy

Broad’s Protection Order was not an isolated instance of perjury—it was one of many false sworn statements used to manufacture my criminalization.

Each time I fought back legally, they adjusted their lies to fit the narrative they needed at the time.

Comparing sworn affidavits from different proceedings reveals the systematic nature of the perjury

Protection Order Affidavit (26 July 2022):

Keith Broad claims he was living at the property and was attacked in his own home.

He Describes The Security Firm I Hired As “Armed Thugs Sent To Intimidate Him.”

He claims he was the victim of a criminal conspiracy.

Spoliation Proceedings Affidavit (August 2022):

Keith Broad now admits that he had not been living in the property for months.
He states that he hired Wouter de Swardt and Fox Forensics to remove me from the property.
He acknowledges that I had lawful possession of the property at the time.

These two versions of events cannot both be true.

If he was living at the property, he could not have simultaneously instructed an illegal eviction.
If he feared for his life, he would not have been hiring private security firms to forcibly remove others.
If he was telling the truth in his Protection Order application, then his later admissions in the spoliation proceedings would amount to a confession that he had filed a false affidavit.

The only logical conclusion: He committed perjury in at least one, if not both, of these sworn statements.

The Legal Implications: A Criminal Offense Under South African Law

Perjury is not just an ethical violation—it is a criminal offense under South African law, punishable by imprisonment.

Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Act: False testimony under oath is a punishable criminal offense.
Section 18(2) of the Riotous Assemblies Act, 1956: Individuals who conspire to commit perjury are equally liable.
Fraud and obstruction of justice: Using perjury to manipulate the legal system constitutes a form of legal fraud and is grounds for prosecution.

The deliberate submission of false affidavits to gain unlawful legal advantages is a crime that must be addressed through criminal prosecution and legal sanctions.

Conclusion: Perjury As The Foundation Of Their Entire Strategy

The entire legal basis of their campaign against me was built on perjury. Every charge, every court order, and every police action stemmed from knowingly false statements designed to:

Keep me unlawfully detained while they took over my properties.
Prevent me from legally reclaiming my assets by creating procedural traps.
Manufacture a criminal record to justify further arrests and media smear campaigns.

This was not incompetence or legal errors—it was a systematic abuse of the justice system, executed with full knowledge of the consequences.

As this chapter demonstrates, perjury was the single most essential tool used to fabricate a case against me, and it is now fully documented and exposed.

KEITH BROAD'S PERJURY - COMPARING HIS 29 JULY 2022 APPLICATION TO CAPE TOWN MAGISTRATES COURT

“On Sunday 24 July 2022 Mr Darren de Rodez Russell and his partner, Mr. Sokanyile arranged to send a large, black SUV with armed gunmen to my property at 16 Leirmans road, Llandudno, in order to Intimidate the occupants and force them to flee in fear so that they could illegally gain access and occupy the property.

I don't know what lengths they will go to to intimidate me or gain access to my property. I live in constant fear for myself, my family and my property.”

KEITH BROAD'S PERJURY - HIS IRRECONCILABLY DIFFERENT APPLICATION FOR THE 4 AUGUST 2022 SPOLIATION HEARING

I engaged the services of Mr Wouter de Swardt ("Mr de Swart") Of Fox Forensics private investigators and security consultants ("fox forensics") .. .. I admit that Mr de swart and/or security staff in the employ of fox forensics gained access to the property on 24 July 2022 with the assistance of ppa security.

I was informed by Mr de swart that he attended the property several times during the preceding week and that, on the occasions that he had been to the property, there was nobody present or occupying it"

OCCASIONS ON WHICH EVIDENCE WAS NECESSARY BUT NEVER MATERIALISED:

Throughout the campaign against me, Keith and Inge Broad, Paula Disberry, and their appointed enforcer, Wouter de Swardt, made bold and damning allegations—allegations that were uncritically amplified by Media24 and supported by SAPS officers who treated falsehoods as fact. Each accusation was made with absolute certainty, framed as indisputable truth, and used as justification for arrests, property seizures, and media smear campaigns.

Yet, for all their conviction, not once did they produce the evidence that should have been essential to proving their case. The failure to present evidence was not due to oversight or incompetence—it was by design.

This chapter systematically examines how the complete absence of evidence was not an obstacle but an intentional strategy that allowed them to wield allegations as weapons without the burden of proof.

The Strategic Deployment Of Fabrication Over Facts

The entire campaign against me was built on the perception of truth rather than truth itself. The mere assertion of wrongdoing was treated as sufficient justification for my repeated arrests and detentions.

The process followed a clear and deliberate pattern:

Fabricate an allegation.
State it categorically with absolute certainty.
Assure authorities, the courts, and the media that evidence exists and will be presented.
Ensure that before the lack of evidence is exposed, the damage has already been done.

This method relied on the assumption that once an arrest was made, once a news article was published, once a property was seized, there would be no urgent requirement to substantiate the allegations with evidence.

For this strategy to work, one element was essential: a complicit investigating officer willing to arrest first and ask questions never.

The Non-Existent Evidence: Why It Was Never Produced

Evidence was never produced for two reasons:

It did not exist—because the allegations were fabricated.
It was unnecessary—because the goal was never conviction but strategic incarceration and financial ruin.

All they needed was a minimal amount of misleading or outright false evidence, a cooperative police officer to misrepresent it, and a media company to launder it into perceived legitimacy.

With these elements in place, the reality of whether or not the allegations were true became irrelevant.

To get me arrested, they needed only a compliant officer.
To keep me detained, they needed only a fabricated affidavit.
To make their allegations appear credible, they needed only a media company willing to print their lies as fact.

The South African Legal System: A Framework Built For Abuse

The South African justice system made this level of abuse possible. Unlike in the UK, where police must present a strong, evidence-backed case before making an arrest, South African law allows for arrests based on mere suspicion.

This structural flaw allowed the investigating officers to justify my arrest with nothing more than uncorroborated allegations.

A system designed to prioritize detention over evidence.
A system where an investigating officer's "word" is enough to detain someone.
A system where evidence could be fabricated or withheld as necessary, without oversight.

This chapter details how this evidence-free approach was leveraged repeatedly to keep me incarcerated at key strategic moments.

The Absence Of Checks And Balances

In multiple instances, the judiciary itself attempted to prevent this abuse—but was overruled by complicit officers:

No warrant was ever issued for my August 2022 arrest.
Two separate magistrates denied SAPS (South African Police Service)’ request for a seizure warrant.
The December arrest warrant was rejected twice before SAPS (South African Police Service) bypassed the courts and had it signed off internally.

At every stage, the absence of evidence should have prevented them from proceeding. Instead, they simply circumvented judicial oversight and used deception to manufacture legal justification for my detention.

Where Is The Evidence? The Questions They Cannot Answer

The following are just some of the crucial moments where evidence should have been essential—but never materialized:

If Keith Broad had real proof of fraud, why did he fabricate his protection order application instead of presenting actual financial records?
If Paula Disberry had real proof of criminality, why did she obtain false affidavits instead of producing genuine testimony?
If Wouter de Swardt had real proof of hidden assets, why did every forensic financial investigation come up empty?
If SAPS (South African Police Service) had real proof of a crime, why did the prosecution drop every charge the moment the docket was examined?

The Docket: A Case With No Evidence

The docket itself is one of the strongest proofs of the fabricated nature of this case.

For over a year and a half, I was denied access to the docket that supposedly contained the evidence against me. When it was finally revealed, it contained:

Three fraudulent affidavits from Paula Disberry.
Four demonstrably false affidavits from Sergeant Stevens and Home Affairs.
No financial records, no contractual evidence, no documentary proof of fraud.

This was not a case—it was an illusion of a case.

Even SAPS (South African Police Service), with all its resources, could not manufacture the evidence they had promised for over a year.

The Sixty-Plus Occasions Where Evidence Was Necessary—And Never Appeared

Across multiple civil, criminal, and media proceedings, there were at least 60 instances where evidence should have been required—but was never provided.

Why was no evidence presented at the August arrest?
Why was no evidence produced to justify the December arrest?
Why was no evidence used in court when SAPS opposed bail?
Why did the prosecution withdraw all charges instead of using the supposed "evidence"?
Why did the media publish defamatory claims without verifying the evidence?

The answer to all of these questions is the same: there was no evidence.

The Final Proof: The Prosecution Collapsed The Moment Evidence Was Required

Ultimately, the best indicator of the complete absence of evidence is the fact that the prosecution collapsed the moment it was forced to present its case.

The charges were not withdrawn due to legal technicalities—they were withdrawn because there was no case.
The prosecution did not proceed because they had nothing to proceed with.
Every charge, every arrest, every piece of "evidence" disintegrated under scrutiny.

In the end, the only thing they had was their own lies, and once those could no longer be sustained, their fabricated case fell apart.

Conclusion: The Systematic Use Of Fabricated Allegations In Place Of Facts

This chapter demonstrates with irrefutable clarity that:

Not one of the charges was supported by real evidence.
Not one of the arrests was justified by actual proof of wrongdoing.
Not one of the court proceedings had a legitimate factual basis.

This was not a prosecution—it was a coordinated effort to use the appearance of legal process to achieve unlawful objectives.

By exposing the complete lack of evidence in every aspect of this case, this chapter provides the final, undeniable proof that this entire operation was a fraud.

THE ATTACKS: HOW A STRATEGIC SMEAR CAMPAIGN AND TARGETED FINANCIAL

From the outset, the landlords, investigators, and media accomplices aligned in a coordinated effort to manipulate public perception, weaponizing false narratives and fabricated accusations to achieve unlawful evictions, financial ruin, and prolonged incarceration.

The attacks were not random or reactionary—they were a structured, multi-tiered assault designed to create an environment where any action against me, no matter how illegal, would be seen as justified.

This chapter dissects the key attacks, the fabrication of the rent arrears myth, and the deliberate financial sabotage that served as the foundation for their broader strategy.

The Fabricated Rent Arrears Narrative: A Textbook Case Of Victim Blaming

The primary allegation pushed by Keith Broad, Wouter de Swardt, and News24 was that I habitually rented luxury properties, paid for a short period, and then stopped paying rent while continuing to occupy the premises illegally.

This false claim was their most crucial weapon because:

It allowed them to portray themselves as victims of a fraudulent tenant.
It provided a legal and moral pretext for their illegal evictions.
It justified their sabotage of revenue streams, creating a crisis that they could then blame on me.

Reality Vs. Their Lies

Their Narrative:

I was a manipulative tenant who only paid rent for the first month or two and then refused to leave.
The landlords had no idea that their properties were being sublet.
The rental business was a scam designed to defraud guests.

The Truth:

For nearly two years, rent was paid in full and on time, totalling R4,453,041 against R4,310,853 due—an overpayment of R142,188.
The landlords knew and approved of the rental business, and multiple contracts, emails, and messages confirm this.
The false arrears allegations only emerged after they had sabotaged revenue streams—a blatant attempt to justify the very problem they had created.

The Attacks On Revenue: Systematic Financial Sabotage

Rent payments did not cease due to mismanagement or fraud—they became impossible due to the landlords deliberate, coordinated attacks on every revenue stream.

April 2022 – The Booking Platform Massacre

In a single coordinated move, all villa listings were removed from Airbnb, Booking.com, and other platforms, instantly eliminating revenue.

This erased over R6 million in projected income, leaving no ability to pay staff, rent, or operational costs.

The Attack Was Executed By Landlords Falsely Claiming The Properties Were “Fraudulent Listings.”

Ongoing Guest Interference & Targeted Smear Campaigns

Fake Instagram accounts were created to mirror the villa names and flood social media with false claims about scams.

Potential guests were contacted directly and told they were booking “fraudulent” properties.

Reviews were manipulated, fake complaints were submitted, and guests were pressured to cancel.

Direct Theft & Asset Seizure

During the illegal evictions, critical assets—including operational equipment, client records, and my passport—were stolen.

This not only disrupted business operations but created legal vulnerabilities that were then used against me.

Legal & Procedural Harassment To Block Recovery

Every time the business attempted to recover; arrests were strategically timed to coincide with peak operational periods.

Court actions and procedural filings were deliberately scheduled to prevent access to financial resources.

Media-Driven Reputation Attacks

News24 articles were fed with fabricated claims, ensuring public perception was turned against me before any legal scrutiny could occur.

SAPS (South African Police Service) officers and landlords coordinated leaks to journalists, ensuring that false accusations received maximum media coverage.

The Massive Contradiction In Their Allegations

The landlords’ public narrative has always been that:

They were unaware of the rental operation.
They were devastated by financial losses due to unpaid rent.
They had no choice but to take legal action.

However, their own documented actions completely contradict this version of events.

If they did not know about the rental business, why did they accept over 50 months of rent payments without objection?
If they suffered financial losses, why did they deliberately destroy revenue streams that would have ensured rent continued to be paid?
If they were acting in good faith, why did they repeatedly violate legal processes, file fraudulent claims, and engage in coordinated illegal evictions?

The truth is stark and undeniable: they engineered the financial crisis, weaponized it, and then used it as an excuse to seize properties, assets, and revenue.

The Legal Implications Of This Attack Strategy

This level of coordinated financial sabotage, procedural abuse, and perjury constitutes criminal activity under South African law.

Fraud & Perjury: The landlords and their accomplices made false statements under oath in legal proceedings, using knowingly fabricated claims to manipulate the courts.
Obstruction of Justice: Critical documents were withheld, procedural abuses were committed, and legal avenues were deliberately manipulated to prevent accountability.
Illegal Evictions: Every property seizure violated South African rental laws, bypassing formal eviction procedures in favour of brute-force removals.
Defamation & False Reporting: The media’s complicity in laundering false claims into the public sphere destroyed reputations and misled law enforcement.

Conclusion: A Campaign Built On Deception And Systematic Abuse

This chapter exposes, in irrefutable detail, how:

The rent arrears claim was a fabricated pretext used to justify financial and legal attacks.
The landlords and investigators coordinated the deliberate sabotage of revenue streams, ensuring financial ruin.
SAPS and the media actively enabled the destruction of my business, reputation, and legal standing.
The entire operation was designed to criminalize me, despite the absence of any legal justification.

This was not a legal dispute over unpaid rent—it was a carefully orchestrated strategy to destroy a business, seize assets, and manufacture a false criminal narrative.

The lies, contradictions, and documented sabotage now stand fully exposed, ensuring that the truth of this conspiracy is undeniable.

THE PROOF: EVERY ALLEGATION EXAMINED, EVERY ONE PROVEN FALSE

The entire purpose of the arrests, detentions, and criminal charges was not to seek justice—but to destroy my financial stability and reputation long enough for them to achieve their objectives.

If the goal was prosecution, why was not a single charge upheld?
If the allegations were real, why did every case collapse in court?
If the evidence was credible, why did SAPS (South African Police Service) and prosecutors refuse to present it?

The outcomes tell the real story:

The August 2022 arrest: No arrest warrant, no valid charges, all charges dismissed.
The December 2022 arrest: No arrest warrant, fabricated visa charge added, all charges dismissed.
The malicious prosecutions: Every single one withdrawn or thrown out.
The fabricated protection orders: Exposed in court as based on perjury.
The civil cases: Every time I was present, I won. The only times Keith Broad won were when I was unlawfully imprisoned.

This is not just failure—it is proof of criminality. If even one of their allegations had merit, the outcomes would be different.

Their Only ‘Victories’ Prove My Point

The only two times Keith Broad “won” in court were:

When I was illegally imprisoned in August 2022.
When I was illegally imprisoned in December 2022.

In both cases:

I was not present.
I was unable to defend myself.
The case was won based entirely on perjury and misrepresentation.

These were not legal victories—they were the result of my unlawful detention, proving that my arrests were a strategic tool to manipulate court outcomes.

In contrast:

Every case where I was present, I won.
Every charge where evidence was required, it was dismissed.

The Media’S Role: Reporting The Accusations, Never The Outcomes

The public was told about every arrest, every charge, and every court hearing.
The public was never told that every charge was thrown out.

Not once did Media24 report on the actual legal outcomes of the cases they covered.

They were eager to print lies about my supposed crimes.
They refused to print the truth about my exoneration.

If the goal was justice, why did they stop reporting when the truth came out?

The answer is simple—the truth didn’t suit their agenda.

The Real Criminals Remain Untouched

While I was arrested multiple times on fabricated charges, the real criminals remain investigated and untouched.

Over 700 documented crimes committed by SAPS officers, private investigators, and landlords.
Zero investigations into those crimes.
Zero arrests of the real perpetrators.

This is not justice—this is organized corruption.

Conviction Was Never The Goal—Incarceration Was

The goal was never prosecution—it was imprisonment.
The arrests weren’t about the law—they were about seizing my assets, destroying my reputation, and forcing me out.
By the time the charges were thrown out, the damage had already been done.

The Final Proof: The Outcomes Speak For Themselves

Every single independent review of this case has proven that the allegations were false, the charges were fabricated, and the actions against me were criminal.

The courts dismissed every charge.
The magistrates condemned the actions of SAPS and the complainants.
PSIRA has already begun prosecuting Wouter de Swardt.
The Western Cape Police Ombudsman, the Anti-Corruption Unit, and Home Affairs are all investigating.

Every single independent examination validates my position and exposes theirs as fraudulent.

Conclusion: The Outcomes As The Final Proof Of A Criminal Conspiracy

Every charge failed.
Every case collapsed.
Every allegation was proven false.

The only thing that succeeded was their strategic use of the legal system to keep me imprisoned long enough for them to achieve their goals.

This is not just wrongful prosecution—it is a criminal conspiracy to weaponize the justice system for private financial gain.

This chapter serves as final, indisputable proof that every action taken against me was unlawful, fraudulent, and orchestrated.

HIGH COURT JUDGMENT: THE LEGAL VICTORY THAT EXPOSED THE CONSPIRACY

The High Court ruling in Sokanyile & Others v Broad & Another (12525/2022) [2022] ZAWCHC 156 was not just a legal victory—it was a categorical legal rejection of the false narratives, unlawful evictions, and criminal conspiracy orchestrated by Keith Broad, Wouter de Swardt, and their associates.

For over a year, they weaponized law enforcement, private security, and the media to execute their plan: remove me from my properties, sabotage my ability to fight back, and silence me through legal and financial ruin. But when the case finally reached the High Court, their entire operation crumbled under scrutiny.

This chapter provides an evidence-based analysis of the High Court judgment, how it vindicated my position, and why it serves as irrefutable proof of the conspiracy against me.

The Illegal Evictions: A Violent, Lawless Takeover

The judgment stems from the events of July 2022, when Wouter de Swardt, acting on behalf of Keith Broad, led a team of hired thugs to illegally seize control of 16 Leirmans Road, one of the key properties at the centre of this case.

22 July 2022 – Wouter De Swardt and eight men force their way onto the property, harass paying guests, and falsely claim the rental was a scam.
24 July 2022 – A second attempt is made, this time successful, using physical violence to remove lawful tenants, including the housekeeper and property manager.
PPA Security colludes with Keith Broad – Instead of protecting the tenants, the security company tricked them into opening the door before allowing the illegal takeover.
Police refusal to intervene – Despite multiple emergency calls, SAPS (South African Police Service) officers ignored the situation, further demonstrating their complicity.

This was not an eviction—it was a criminal takeover, carried out with force, deception, and threats of violence.

The High Court Case: Taking The Criminals To Court

With no legal basis for their actions, Keith Broad and Wouter de Swardt resorted to brute force. I immediately launched an urgent spoliation application in the High Court, demanding the immediate return of possession.

Spoliation proceedings are a legal remedy that prevents self-help evictions—they require that a tenant be restored to possession if forcibly removed without a court order.

The only requirement is proof of possession and unlawful dispossession.
The court does not consider ownership—it only determines whether the eviction was legal.
Keith Broad’s actions were so unlawful that the case was an open-and-shut matter.

The court date was set for 4 August 2022—but rather than defend their actions in court, Keith Broad and Wouter de Swardt tried to derail the case with a last-minute fabricated criminal charge against me, leading to my illegal arrest just hours before the hearing.

The Judgment: A Total Rejection Of Broad’S Defences

Despite their efforts, the case went ahead and resulted in a decisive ruling against Keith Broad and his accomplices.

The eviction was entirely illegal – The judge ruled that Broad had no legal right to remove tenants in this manner.
The methods used were unlawful and violent – The court condemned the use of private security thugs and SAPS complicity.
The allegations against me were irrelevant and misleading – The judge dismissed Keith Broad’s attempts to justify the eviction with false claims about my visa status.
The court ordered the immediate return of possession – I was granted full possession of the property, and Broad was barred from interfering.
Punitive costs were awarded against Keith Broad – A financial penalty was imposed, recognizing the severity of his unlawful actions.

The ruling made crystal clear that this was never about a legal dispute—it was a criminal operation carried out under the guise of a landlord dispute.

Keith Broad’S Three Defences—All Categorically Rejected

“Russell Was Not In Possession Of The Property.”
The court found this argument absurd, confirming that I had clear possession through my lease, management of guests, and contractual rights.
The fact that they had to use force to remove occupants proved that someone else was in possession—a direct contradiction of Broad’s argument.
“Returning The Property Would Be Illegal Due To Visa Issues.”
The court rejected this outright, calling it a distraction tactic.
There was zero evidence of any visa violation, and even if there was, it had no bearing on the eviction case.
“An Interdict Was Not Necessary.”
The court ruled that an interdict was absolutely necessary because Broad’s history of prior evictions showed he would continue his unlawful tactics if not restrained.
Every single one of Broad’s legal arguments was ripped apart by the High Court.

The Media’S Coverage—Reporting The Lies, Ignoring The Truth

While every legal finding in this case vindicated me, the media refused to report on the judgment.

News24 published multiple false articles before the case—but ignored the ruling entirely.
No outlet reported on the judgment that exposed the eviction as unlawful.
Every accusation made against me was front-page news—but the High Court’s total rejection of them was buried.

The refusal to correct the record was deliberate and strategic—a blatant act of journalistic complicity in Broad’s disinformation campaign.

The Impact Of The Judgment: Exposing The Entire Operation

The ruling had far-reaching consequences:

It proved that Keith Broad, Wouter de Swardt, and their associates had no legal claim to the properties.
It exposed the conspiracy between private actors and law enforcement.
It served as irrefutable evidence that my arrests were unlawful and orchestrated.
It established that all subsequent charges and legal actions against me were rooted in perjury and procedural abuse.

This was not just a personal victory—it was a legal demolition of the false case built against me.

Conclusion: The High Court Ruling As Final Proof Of A Criminal Conspiracy

Every legal challenge mounted by Broad collapsed under scrutiny.
Every lie told to justify their actions was exposed as false.
Every effort to evade accountability was thwarted by the courts.

The judgment is not just a ruling—it is the final piece of evidence that proves this entire operation was fraudulent, illegal, and orchestrated from the start.

This case was never about the law—it was about power, control, and financial gain. Broad, de Swardt, and their accomplices never had a legal case—they had a criminal strategy.

But when the facts were placed before the High Court, their entire conspiracy was laid bare for what it was—a corrupt, lawless attempt to steal property through force and deception.

KEITH’S HONEST & PROFESSIONAL AGENT: THE INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE OF KWEITH BROAD'S CRIMINAL CONDUCT

This chapter examines the pivotal role of Anton Moller, Keith Broad’s own appointed agent, whose testimony and WhatsApp records demolish every single false allegation Keith and Inge Broad made. Unlike biased and self-serving statements made by the Broads, Moller’s communications—spanning months—serve as irrefutable evidence, proving that Keith Broad's actions were premeditated, fraudulent, and financially motivated.

The Significance Of Anton Moller’s Evidence

Keith Broad’s tactics revolved around deception, but his own agent inadvertently documented the real story. The evidence in WhatsApp messages, emails, and Anton Moller’s affidavit provides a detailed, chronological account of how Keith systematically fabricated arrears, manipulated financial arrangements, and abused eviction laws to achieve his ultimate goal: illegally reclaiming the property after I had invested heavily in its transformation.

Anton Moller was not my agent—he worked for Keith Broad and was bound to act in his best interests.
Yet, his own messages confirm that my rent was fully paid, that Keith Broad engaged in financial extortion, and that Keith repeatedly violated landlord-tenant laws.
Keith Broad’s later claims of arrears, damage, or contract violations were all fabricated post-factum—none of these issues were raised at the time, and Anton Moller’s messages prove this beyond doubt.

Keith Broad’S Pattern Of Coercion And Financial Extortion

At the core of Keith Broad’s scheme was a systematic campaign of financial pressure and coercion. Anton Moller’s communications reveal that Keith Broad never intended to honour the five-year lease agreement—his goal was to use every possible pretext to force me out once the property had been renovated.

Keith Broad repeatedly attempted to change the financial terms of the agreement mid-lease.
He illegally locked me out of the property while falsely demanding early rent payments as ransom for access.
He intentionally disrupted business operations to force financial strain, while simultaneously demanding full payment for periods in which he had illegally denied access to the property.

These are not speculative claims. Anton Moller’s WhatsApp messages confirm that Keith Broad sought early rent payments under the false pretext of necessity, despite knowing full well that I had already paid rent in advance. His tactics were textbook financial duress, designed to extract maximum monetary gain before illegally terminating the lease.

The December 24Th Eviction: Calculated, Illegal, And Extortionate

One of the most damning revelations from Anton Moller’s messages is the evidence surrounding the December 24th illegal eviction. This was not an isolated incident but a premeditated strategy executed at the most financially vulnerable time—the peak holiday rental season.

Anton Moller acknowledges that Keith Broad’s primary concern was money—nothing else.
WhatsApp messages show that Keith Broad deliberately locked me out, fully aware that doing so would cause catastrophic financial losses.
The eviction was designed to force early rent payments through sheer desperation—holding my business and financial stability hostage.
Keith Broad’s later attempts to claim the eviction was for legal reasons are blown apart by Anton Moller’s private communications, which confirm it was purely financial extortion.

Anton Moller’s messages demonstrate that Keith Broad’s strategy was simple: inflict maximum financial damage, use that damage as leverage, and then fabricate arrears to justify a fraudulent eviction.

The Lie Of Rent Arrears—Exposed By Keith Broad’s Own Agent

Throughout the entire tenancy, not a single payment was missed or late. The financial records prove it. However, Moller’s WhatsApp exchanges further destroy Keith Broad’s false arrears narrative by showing:

Keith Broad demanded payment for utilities and services before they were even billed.
He repeatedly chased payments for services that had yet to be used, branding any delay—no matter how short—as “arrears.”
Despite rent being fully paid until April, Keith Broad continued to demand money, even while illegally evicting me.
Anton Keith Broad’s aggressive pursuit of rent and utility payments in advance was a deliberate tactic to manufacture financial duress.

The irony is unavoidable: while Keith accused me of being in arrears, it was he who pocketed tens of thousands of rands in utility payments without passing them on to service providers, resulting in municipal disconnections.

Illegal Evictions: Keith’S Pattern Of Retaliatory Misconduct

Anton Moller’s records also expose the full extent of Keith Broad’s illegal evictions, revealing a pattern of abuse in which Keith:

Reclaimed possession of the property without a court order, violating eviction laws.
Blocked my access to the property despite full rent payments, leveraging access for further financial gain.
Locked out legitimate paying guests, sabotaging business operations to create financial instability.
Used unlawful evictions as a means to coerce compliance with new financial demands.

Anton Moller’s own frustrations—expressed in messages—show that he was fully aware Keith Broad was acting illegally but felt powerless to intervene.

Anton Moller’s Affidavit: The Final Blow To Keith Broad’s Fabricated Case

Faced with the overwhelming weight of evidence, Anton Moller was ultimately compelled to submit an affidavit confirming that Keith Broad’s claims were false. This legal statement directly contradicts every public and legal assertion made by Keith and Inge Keith Broad:

It confirms that rent was always paid, often ahead of schedule.
It acknowledges Keith Broad’s financial desperation as the true motive behind his actions.
It details Keith Broad’s deliberate and repeated violations of the lease agreement.
It serves as an impartial record, given that Anton Moller had no vested interest in my defense.

Anton Moller’s affidavit was not an act of loyalty to me—it was an act of integrity, confirming that Keith Broad had orchestrated a fraudulent campaign based on outright lies.

The Collapse Of Keith Broad’s Narrative

For over a year, Keith and Inge Broad pushed a carefully constructed false narrative. They claimed that I was a delinquent tenant, that I damaged the property, and that evictions were necessary due to arrears. Yet not a single one of these claims withstands scrutiny when placed against:

Financial records proving all payments were made on time.
WhatsApp messages confirming Keith’s fraudulent financial demands.
Anton Moller’s affidavit, which exposes the lies and confirms the facts.
Keith Broad’s repeated breaches of legal and contractual obligations.

Keith Broad’s scheme relied on weaponizing legal procedures, manipulating the media, and leveraging financial stress to force an unlawful eviction. However, the paper trail—spanning texts, emails, affidavits, and financial transactions—completely unravels his case.

Conclusion: The Legal Ramifications Of Keith Broad’s Conduct

The documented evidence in this chapter presents an airtight case of illegal conduct, proving beyond question that Keith Broad engaged in:

Illegal evictions in violation of landlord-tenant laws.
Financial extortion through coerced early payments.
Misrepresentation and fraud in the handling of rental and utility accounts.
Obstruction of business operations with the intent to force financial strain.

Under South African law, each of these actions carries serious legal consequences. This chapter establishes that Keith and Inge Keith Broad, along with their enablers, systematically engaged in unlawful practices designed to achieve an illegal outcome.

Keith Broad’s own agent, in his messages and sworn affidavit, has provided the most damning evidence against him—evidence that completely dismantles every lie he ever told.

THE FINANCIAL MOTIVATION: HOW LANDLORDS PROFITED FROM MY WORK & WHY MY REMOVAL WAS CRUCIAL

The transformation of multiple high-value rental properties in Cape Town’s most sought-after areas was a direct result of the substantial investments I made—financially, structurally, and operationally. Contrary to the landlords' later false narratives, their financial position was not harmed by my tenancy but was vastly improved due to the renovations, increased rental yields, and enhanced property values. This chapter lays out, with supporting evidence, the staggering financial gains they stood to make—and how those gains could only be fully realized by illegally engineering my removal.

From the outset, the landlords fully consented to the short-term rental model, explicitly agreeing that this would allow me to recoup the substantial upfront costs required to refurbish the properties. The improvements were extensive, elevating dilapidated or underperforming assets into ultra-premium, high-yielding rentals commanding multiple times their previous income. Yet, within months of these transformations, the same landlords who had recruited me to upgrade their properties reversed course, seeking to reclaim them—without the obligations of a long-term lease or the investments they had neither the resources nor the expertise to make themselves.

The Extraordinary Financial Gains Enabled By My Tenancy

Every metric of financial performance improved dramatically due to the work I carried out at my own expense. The scale of these gains is evidenced through:

Rent Per Night: Prior to my tenancy, properties were commanding rates of R3,000 to R4,000 per night, with limited occupancy. After the refurbishments, those same properties were achieving between R18,000 and R27,000 per night.
Occupancy Rates: Before my tenancy, properties were rented for only 10-15 nights per month, at best. Post-refurbishment, the occupancy rate soared to an average of 25 nights per month.
Rental Revenue Increase: This combination of higher rates and increased bookings resulted in rental incomes that tripled or quadrupled from their previous levels. In some cases, the financial uplift was over 1,500% compared to pre-lease earnings.
Property Value Appreciation: The capital value of the properties increased dramatically, with Leirmans Road alone being listed at R31 million just weeks after my December arrest, up from its original R18 million valuation before I entered into the lease. This near-80% increase is directly attributable to the refurbishments, design enhancements, and structural improvements made under my tenure.

The Numbers: Projected Gains Versus My Rental Agreements

Over a five-year lease period, the total rental income the landlords would have received under our agreements was approximately R30 million. However, due to my work and the new revenue models, the properties were positioned to generate a staggering R150 million over the same period—five times what they would have earned from me.

Had I remained a tenant:

The landlords would have received R30 million in stable rental income over five years.
The properties, having been refurbished, would have retained significantly increased capital values at the end of the lease.

By engineering my removal:

They immediately took possession of fully transformed high-value properties.
They gained access to the vastly increased rental income, amounting to an additional R120 million over five years.
They benefited from the R30 million rise in capital values, positioning them to sell the properties at a significantly higher price.

The Strategic Incentive To Remove Me

These gains could only be fully realized if I was removed. Had the landlords honoured the agreements, they would have been legally bound to the lease terms, restricting their ability to benefit from the immediate gains of the upgraded properties. My continued presence meant:

They were contractually obligated to allow me to continue renting, preventing immediate access to increased rental yields. ✔ They could not immediately sell the properties at the vastly inflated post-refurbishment valuations.
They could not claim any of my extensive furniture, décor, and fittings—many of which had been custom-built to elevate the properties into a premium market category.

Thus, the strategy became clear:

Invalidate the leases by any means necessary.
Create legal and financial pressure to force me out.
Fabricate narratives that painted me as a financial liability rather than the true source of their newfound wealth.
Weaponize the legal system and SAPS officers to orchestrate arrests that would remove me from the equation entirely.

The Impossibility Of Their Claims

The landlords, through manipulated media narratives and legal manoeuvres, attempted to paint themselves as financial victims. Yet their own public listings, rental adverts, and financial records contradict every claim they have made. Consider:

Prior to the lease: Leirmans Road was valued at R18 million and failed to sell at R22 million.

After the lease: The same property was listed for R31 million, an increase of R13 million—entirely due to the refurbishments.
Prior to the lease: Rental income across the properties totalled R5-6 million per year.
After the lease: The same properties were generating R20-25 million per year.

Had my alleged "damage" to the properties been real, these numbers would be impossible.

The Hypocrisy: What The Landlords Claimed Vs. What They Did

The contradictions in their statements expose the fraudulence of their accusations:

They claimed the properties were "damaged beyond repair"—yet continued to use my photographs and descriptions in their sales listings.
They alleged financial ruin—yet achieved some of the most lucrative rental returns in the area’s history.
They falsely stated they were unaware of the leasing arrangements—despite signed agreements, direct involvement in property management, and explicit WhatsApp and email conversations acknowledging every detail of the model.
They accused me of non-payment—yet their own records (and an affidavit from their own letting agents) confirmed full and timely payments until their campaign to reclaim the properties began.
They accused me of subletting without permission—despite emails and messages proving that the subletting model was their suggestion from the outset, and the only way the lease made financial sense for either party.

These fabrications were not just distortions of the truth—they were an essential part of the campaign to justify their collusion with SAPS (South African Police Service), the illegal evictions disguised as arrests, and the media manipulation that followed.

The Financial Trail Tells The True Story

Ultimately, this chapter demonstrates—through hard financial data, documented correspondence, and third-party evidence—that the real beneficiaries of this entire ordeal were the landlords.

Every metric of value—rental income, occupancy rates, capital appreciation—improved drastically due to my involvement.
My removal was not due to any wrongdoing but because I was an obstacle to them immediately cashing in on these newfound gains.
The financial incentive behind their actions is indisputable—and entirely documented through their own advertisements, property listings, and financial records.

This chapter exposes the core truth that the false allegations, unlawful arrests, and coordinated campaign against me were driven entirely by greed and financial gain. The figures are undeniable, and the hypocrisy is laid bare for all to see.

KEITH BROAD'S HOME INVASION

This chapter documents the premeditated, unlawful home invasion and violent attack carried out by Keith Broad, exposing the full extent of his lies, fabrications, and criminal actions. Supported by video footage, WhatsApp messages, and sworn testimony, it dismantles his false claims and proves his deliberate and unlawful intent.

The facts and evidence establish the following:

The Unlawful Eviction Attempts Leading Up to the Home Invasion – The incident was not an isolated act but part of a sustained campaign, including multiple previous illegal eviction attempts, fabricated rental arrears, and fraudulent demands for payment, despite rent and utilities being fully paid.
The Incident on 27 February 2022: Guests Locked Out Under Direct Orders from Keith Broad – A German family, including a mother, father, and infant child, arrived at the property to find themselves unlawfully locked out. Keith Broad had personally instructed Willem, the housekeeper, to deny them entry, even as the mother stood outside in tears, holding her baby. This was deliberate, calculated, and without legal basis.
The Financial and Business Impact – The unlawful lockout forced the guests to leave, resulting in a full refund at significant financial loss. The fabricated claim that they were victims of a "scam" was later weaponized by Keith Broad to spread false narratives among neighbours and the media.
The Role of Willem: Keith Broad’s Informant and Accomplice – WhatsApp exports prove that Willem provided daily reports, photos, and intelligence to Keith Broad, exposing the depth of his involvement in the unlawful eviction attempts and financial fraud. This was not speculation—his communications prove he was acting on Keith Broad’s direct orders.
The Home Invasion: Keith Broad’s Forced Entry and Physical Aggression – On the night of the attack, Keith Broad arrived with Bobby Broad and an unidentified accomplice, carrying weapons. The property had been legally secured, with locks changed due to previous illegal eviction attempts. Keith Broad then physically kicked in the front door, splitting it in half—an act of premeditated forced entry, captured on video.
Keith Broad’s Lies About the Forced Entry – In later sworn affidavits and legal filings, Keith Broad falsely claimed:
The door was already open.
He only "lightly pushed it."
He was merely checking on the property.
These statements were deliberate perjury, contradicted by video footage showing the extreme force he used to break in, his threats, and his aggression.
WhatsApp Evidence and Keith Broad’s Own Admissions – The WhatsApp export provides indisputable proof that Keith Broad was fully aware of his illegal actions, and in fact, planned them in advance. His own messages contradict his claims, including:
Explicit instructions to Willem to lock the property before guests arrived.
Discussions about taking possession of the property after the guests left—despite a valid lease still being in place.
Coordinated planning with his legal team to fabricate arrears as an excuse for eviction.
Verbal and Physical Threats Captured on Video – The confrontation at the property is fully documented in both video and audio recordings, exposing:
Keith Broad threatening to "drag" me out of the property.
Explicit statements that he does not recognize the lease agreement, despite having accepted and benefited from rental payments.
Repeated demands that I leave, despite having no lawful basis for eviction.
Fabricated Legal Claims and Perjury in Court Documents – After the home invasion, Keith Broad attempted to cover his tracks by filing false affidavits, misrepresenting events, and lying under oath. His legal claims included:
That the eviction was lawful—proven false by his own WhatsApp communications.
That he did not force entry—proven false by the video footage.
That I had no lease—proven false by written lease agreements, rental payments, and prior acknowledgments by Keith Broad himself.
The Role of Law Enforcement and Security Response –
PPA Security, called by me and my staff, not Keith Broad, arrived at the scene, confronting Keith about his actions.
SAPS officers, despite being presented with clear video evidence of forced entry, threats, and unlawful eviction, failed to arrest Keith Broad or intervene appropriately.

Instead of facing consequences, Keith Broad left without any legal repercussions, highlighting the systemic failure of law enforcement to act against well-connected individuals who openly break the law.

Conclusion: A Home Invasion Exposed

This chapter presents irrefutable evidence of Keith Broad’s criminal actions, proving that this was not a landlord-tenant dispute—

it was:

A coordinated campaign to unlawfully seize a property through force, deception, and fabricated legal claims.
An outright home invasion, proven by video and audio evidence, WhatsApp messages, and sworn testimony.
A case study in perjury and legal manipulation, with Keith Broad lying under oath to justify his actions.
A damning indictment of law enforcement's failure to intervene, despite overwhelming proof of criminality.

This was not just an eviction. This was a crime.

KEITH BROAD'S HOME INVASION

Keith Broad, Inge Broad Home Invasion Keith & Inge Broad – Illegal Home Invasion (1 March)

On 1 March 2023, Keith and Inge Broad forced their way into my home — without a court order, without a warrant, and without any legal authority whatsoever. I told them clearly and repeatedly that they had no right to enter, but they pushed their way in anyway, barging through the gate and into the house.

This was not a misunderstanding. It was a calculated act of criminal trespass — a deliberate attempt to intimidate me and unlawfully seize the property. It formed part of their ongoing campaign of harassment, defamation, and asset theft. What you're seeing in these videos is a home invasion, carried out in broad daylight by individuals who believed they were above the law — and who acted with total impunity.

JOHANNES LOUBSER WHATSAPP CHAT TAKEAWAYS

These messages, which form part of a larger, undisputed evidentiary record, prove—beyond any reasonable doubt—that the

narrative Keith Broad and others constructed was false from the outset.

It also disproves the widely circulated claim that "there are more cases we don't know about," as the messages confirm that all known disputes originate from Keith Broad and Inge Broad’s deliberate campaign to seize the property and that no hidden or undisclosed cases exist.

This chapter outlines, with irrefutable documentary evidence, that:

The WhatsApp Chat Exports: The Unaltered, Undisputed Record

WhatsApp chat records provide the single most transparent, unfiltered account of what actually transpired, as they were never written with an audience in mind.

Unlike fabricated legal claims and media narratives, these messages cannot be rewritten, manipulated, or selectively altered to fit an agenda.

In these conversations, I meticulously documented:

Every unlawful eviction attempt carried out by Keith Broad—including the physical break-ins, threats, and forced entries, proving these were not isolated incidents but a calculated and escalating campaign.
The complete absence of any arrears or contractual breaches on my part—establishing that all claims of non-payment were later fabricated as a retroactive justification for illegal actions already carried out.
Repeated legal strategies used by Keith and his associates to create false pretexts for eviction—including his attempts to rewrite the lease, fabricate rent disputes, and falsely claim property damage that he was fully aware did not exist.
Keith Broad’s direct use of lies and deception—contradicting himself in legal proceedings and media statements, despite his own WhatsApp messages proving he was fully aware that rent was paid and that all lease terms were upheld.
The Eviction Attempts: WhatsApp Messages as Proof of a Coordinated Strategy
The real-time discussions with my attorneys establish that every major action taken by Keith Broad and his legal team was part of a structured plan to forcibly remove me from the property through deception and unlawful means.
WhatsApp messages show Keith attempting to cancel a legally binding lease as if it were a casual arrangement—ignoring tenant protections and due process.
The messages expose how eviction attempts were disguised as fabricated arrears claims—despite invoices and proof of payment showing that rent and utilities were consistently settled in advance.
Coordinated attacks spanning over seven months—documented in WhatsApp conversations, proving each new attempt was timed to exploit gaps in legal protections, forcing me into a continuous state of defense against ongoing harassment and legal manipulation.

Lies Under Oath: Keith Broad’s Contradictions Exposed

The WhatsApp messages prove that Keith Broad lied under oath, making sworn statements that directly contradict the messages he sent at the time.

False Claim #1: That I was in arrears and had defaulted on payments.
Proven False: WhatsApp messages between Keith, Johannes, and myself confirm that payments were always made in full, often months in advance.

False Claim #2: That he was unaware of my lease terms and that no renovations were agreed upon.
Proven False: WhatsApp messages prove that he actively monitored and approved all works carried out, receiving daily photographic updates from Willem, his housekeeper.

False Claim #3: That he had no knowledge of the eviction attempts and that they were legal.
Proven False: His own messages reveal a premeditated strategy to remove me through unlawful means, discussing tactics with Willem and other accomplices.

The Legal Strategy: WhatsApp Messages as a Counter-Narrative to the Media Lies
WhatsApp messages exchanged between myself and my legal counsel debunk the falsehoods later spread in the media, by Wouter de Swardt, and in fraudulent court filings.

The messages establish that every single legal case against me originated from Keith Broad and his associates—proving that I never initiated litigation, but only defended against unlawful evictions, false claims, and fraudulent legal attacks.

The WhatsApp chat exports prove the extent of the financial fraud carried out by Keith Broad—including how he systematically demanded rent payments earlier and earlier, manipulating payment schedules to falsely claim “arrears” where none existed.
The WhatsApp chats confirm that Broad was given multiple opportunities to clarify lease disputes but refused to engage in any lawful resolution—instead, proceeding with a campaign of deception, intimidation, and manipulation.

The Real Estate Fraud: How WhatsApp Messages Uncover the Truth

Through thousands of messages, a clear pattern emerges: Keith Broad never intended to honor the lease.

His goal from the outset was to:

Induce me into leasing the property under false pretenses—knowing that I would invest substantial amounts into renovations.
Wait until the property was fully transformed and then initiate eviction attempts—removing me while retaining the benefits of my investments.
Use fabricated legal disputes and false claims to justify property seizures—repeatedly contradicting himself in both WhatsApp messages and sworn statements.

WhatsApp messages expose his complete disregard for legal agreements, proving that he manipulated events to create a false narrative of non-compliance where none existed.

The Broader Implications: A Fraudulent Legal Case Built on Lies

The WhatsApp exports reveal:

A real-time record of events, as they actually happened—proving the falsification of legal claims and public allegations.
A systematic effort by Keith Broad to use law enforcement, private investigators, and the media as weapons—orchestrating a campaign of harassment, deception, and property theft.
A deliberate effort to prevent me from mounting a legal defense—through fraudulent eviction attempts, manipulated police reports, and suppression of exculpatory evidence.

Conclusion: The WhatsApp Messages as Indisputable Evidence

This chapter serves as a legal record of fact, grounded in thousands of unaltered, timestamped messages that dismantle every false claim made by Keith Broad and his co-conspirators.

Unlike media articles, court filings riddled with perjury, and orchestrated smear campaigns, these messages are pure, unfiltered, first-hand evidence—the direct communications of those involved, in their own words, at the time the events took place.

The WhatsApp exports confirm the unlawful nature of the eviction attempts, the lies told under oath, and the fabricated nature of the legal cases brought against me.
They establish that the financial and legal attacks were deliberate, calculated moves—part of a larger scheme to seize assets and defraud me of my rightful property.
Most critically, they expose how every single action taken against me was rooted in deception, revealing the full extent of a fraudulent and criminal campaign orchestrated for financial gain.

This chapter is not speculation—it is a comprehensive, unassailable body of evidence that contradicts every falsehood spread in courtrooms, the media, and public discourse.

It stands as the definitive factual record, obliterating the lies that Keith Broad and his associates manufactured to justify their criminal actions.

Johannes Loubser WhatsApp Chat Takeaways

This chapter provides a direct, unaltered account of the events as they unfolded, based on the WhatsApp chat exports between myself and my legal representative, Johannes Loubser, my sole attorney from December 2021 to August 2022, and my primary property attorney until September 2022. These messages, which form part of a larger, undisputed evidentiary record, prove—beyond any reasonable doubt—that the narrative Keith Broad and others constructed was false from the outset.

Through over 220 emails and thousands of WhatsApp messages, this chapter establishes that the reality of events, as documented in real time, was in complete contrast to the fabrications later weaponized against me. It also disproves the widely circulated claim that "there are more cases we don't know about," as the messages confirm that all known disputes originate from Keith Broad and Inge Broad’s deliberate campaign to seize the property and that no hidden or undisclosed cases exist.

This chapter outlines, with irrefutable documentary evidence, that:

1. The WhatsApp Chat Exports: The Unaltered, Undisputed Record

WhatsApp chat records provide the single most transparent, unfiltered account of what actually transpired, as they were never written with an audience in mind. Unlike fabricated legal claims and media narratives, these messages cannot be rewritten, manipulated, or selectively altered to fit an agenda.

In these conversations, I meticulously documented:

Every unlawful eviction attempt carried out by Keith Broad—including the physical break-ins, threats, and forced entries, proving these were not isolated incidents but a calculated and escalating campaign.
The complete absence of any arrears or contractual breaches on my part—establishing that all claims of non-payment were later fabricated as a retroactive justification for illegal actions already carried out.
Repeated legal strategies used by Keith and his associates to create false pretexts for eviction—including his attempts to rewrite the lease, fabricate rent disputes, and falsely claim property damage that he was fully aware did not exist.
Keith Broad’s direct use of lies and deception—contradicting himself in legal proceedings and media statements, despite his own WhatsApp messages proving he was fully aware that rent was paid and that all lease terms were upheld.

2. The Eviction Attempts: WhatsApp Messages as Proof of a Coordinated Strategy

The real-time discussions with my attorneys establish that every major action taken by Keith Broad and his legal team was part of a structured plan to forcibly remove me from the property through deception and unlawful means.

WhatsApp messages show Keith attempting to cancel a legally binding lease as if it were a casual arrangement—ignoring tenant protections and due process.
The messages expose how eviction attempts were disguised as fabricated arrears claims—despite invoices and proof of payment showing that rent and utilities were consistently settled in advance.
Coordinated attacks spanning over seven months—documented in WhatsApp conversations, proving each new attempt was timed to exploit gaps in legal protections, forcing me into a continuous state of defense against ongoing harassment and legal manipulation.

3. Lies Under Oath: Keith Broad’s Contradictions Exposed

The WhatsApp messages prove that Keith Broad lied under oath—making sworn statements that directly contradict the messages he sent at the time.

False Claim #1: That I was in arrears and had defaulted on payments.
Proven False: WhatsApp messages between Keith, Johannes, and myself confirm that payments were always made in full, often months in advance.
False Claim #2: That he was unaware of my lease terms and that no renovations were agreed upon.
Proven False: WhatsApp messages prove that he actively monitored and approved all works carried out, receiving daily photographic updates from Willem, his housekeeper.
False Claim #3: That he had no knowledge of the eviction attempts and that they were legal.
Proven False: His own messages reveal a premeditated strategy to remove me through unlawful means, discussing tactics with Willem and other accomplices.

4. The Legal Strategy: WhatsApp Messages as a Counter-Narrative to the Media Lies

WhatsApp messages exchanged between myself and my legal counsel debunk the falsehoods later spread in the media, by Wouter de Swardt, and in fraudulent court filings.

The messages establish that every single legal case against me originated from Keith Broad and his associates—proving that I never initiated litigation, but only defended against unlawful evictions, false claims, and fraudulent legal attacks.
The WhatsApp chat exports prove the extent of the financial fraud carried out by Keith Broad—including how he systematically demanded rent payments earlier and earlier, manipulating payment schedules to falsely claim “arrears” where none existed.
The WhatsApp chats confirm that Broad was given multiple opportunities to clarify lease disputes but refused to engage in any lawful resolution—instead, proceeding with a campaign of deception, intimidation, and manipulation.

5. The Real Estate Fraud: How WhatsApp Messages Uncover the Truth

Through thousands of messages, a clear pattern emerges: Keith Broad never intended to honor the lease. His goal from the outset was to:

Induce me into leasing the property under false pretenses—knowing that I would invest substantial amounts into renovations.
Wait until the property was fully transformed and then initiate eviction attempts—removing me while retaining the benefits of my investments.
Use fabricated legal disputes and false claims to justify property seizures—repeatedly contradicting himself in both WhatsApp messages and sworn statements.

WhatsApp messages expose his complete disregard for legal agreements, proving that he manipulated events to create a false narrative of non-compliance where none existed.

6. The Broader Implications: A Fraudulent Legal Case Built on Lies

The WhatsApp exports reveal:

A real-time record of events, as they actually happened—proving the falsification of legal claims and public allegations.
A systematic effort by Keith Broad to use law enforcement, private investigators, and the media as weapons—orchestrating a campaign of harassment, deception, and property theft.
A deliberate effort to prevent me from mounting a legal defense—through fraudulent eviction attempts, manipulated police reports, and suppression of exculpatory evidence.

Conclusion: The WhatsApp Messages as Indisputable Evidence

This chapter serves as a legal record of fact, grounded in thousands of unaltered, timestamped messages that dismantle every false claim made by Keith Broad and his co-conspirators. Unlike media articles, court filings riddled with perjury, and orchestrated smear campaigns, these messages are pure, unfiltered, first-hand evidence—the direct communications of those involved, in their own words, at the time the events took place.

The WhatsApp exports confirm the unlawful nature of the eviction attempts, the lies told under oath, and the fabricated nature of the legal cases brought against me.
They establish that the financial and legal attacks were deliberate, calculated moves—part of a larger scheme to seize assets and defraud me of my rightful property.
Most critically, they expose how every single action taken against me was rooted in deception, revealing the full extent of a fraudulent and criminal campaign orchestrated for financial gain.

This chapter is not speculation—it is a comprehensive, unassailable body of evidence that contradicts every falsehood spread in courtrooms, the media, and public discourse. It stands as the definitive factual record, obliterating the lies that Keith Broad and his associates manufactured to justify their criminal actions.

CASE 7902/22 – THE HEARING THAT WAS NEVER ALLOWED TO HAPPEN

This chapter details Case 7902/22, a pivotal legal matter that, if heard, would have exposed the fabricated claims, procedural abuses, and legal distortions that have defined this campaign. The case was not just another civil dispute—it was the opportunity to bring Keith Broad, his associates, and his network of influence within SAPS and other institutions under formal judicial scrutiny.

The core of the case was a request for oral evidence, a fundamental legal process that would have required witnesses, including Keith Broad, to testify under oath and be cross-examined on record. This step was not merely procedural—it was the only means to break through the barrage of false affidavits, contradictions, and outright perjury that had been submitted as evidence against me.

Yet rather than face such scrutiny, Keith Broad delayed, obstructed, and ultimately maneuverer to ensure that this case was never heard. The hearing was originally scheduled for mid-2022, but in a highly strategic move, Broad had it postponed—clearing the way for his “cheaper, faster, and illegal” alternative: using the criminal justice system as a weapon to forcefully evict me under the pretence of fabricated charges..

The Purpose Of This Legal Application

The application sought:

A postponement to allow for oral evidence to be heard, ensuring that the critical disputes of fact were resolved in court through live testimony, rather than relying on written affidavits where falsehoods could be easily submitted without scrutiny.
The right to submit additional evidence, as the facts of the case had evolved and new material had emerged that directly contradicted Broad’s claims.
A ruling on procedural abuses, including misrepresentations in prior affidavits and repeated misconduct in the legal process.
A formal dismissal of Broad’s claims with costs, on the grounds that his arguments were legally baseless and factually dishonest.

Why Oral Evidence Was Essential

This case was never one of clear-cut legal arguments—it was a case of conflicting claims, where one side was lying, and the other had evidence to prove it. The standard legal process of affidavit-based litigation was inadequate to resolve the key issues because:

Keith Broad’s affidavits contained blatant contradictions, which could only be exposed through cross-examination.
Key witnesses, including SAPS (South African Police Service) officers involved in the unlawful eviction attempts, would have been forced to testify, likely revealingKeith the depth of corruption and collusion.
A full evidentiary record would have been established, preventing Keith Broad from shifting his narrative from one affidavit to the next as was his usual practice.

The Postponement That Paved The Way For Criminal Abuse

Instead of allowing the case to proceed, Keith Broad ensured that the hearing was pushed back by several months. This was not a delay out of necessity—it was a calculated move. During this delay, Keith Broad shifted from legal means to illegal ones:

He manufactured criminal charges to achieve what the courts were not allowing him to do.

SAPS (South African Police Service) officers under his influence executed unlawful arrests, ensuring I was taken out of circulation before the hearing could expose the truth.

Fabricated claims about “fraudulent activity” was inserted into legal proceedings to justify false arrests and the illegal eviction campaign.

What This Case Proved—Even Without A Hearing

While the hearing itself was obstructed, the very fact that Keith Broad worked so aggressively to prevent it is evidence in itself. If his claims were legitimate, he would have had every reason to proceed with the hearing and have his version upheld in a trial. Instead, he did everything possible to avoid scrutiny.

The legal application highlighted Keith Broad’s direct role in engineering the circumstances he later cited as justification for eviction:

His own refusals to allow proper legal processes to play out were the reason the dispute remained unresolved.
He manufactured crisis points—including through SAPS (South African Police Service) intervention—to create legal pretexts for urgent action.
He deliberately sabotaged the standard legal process to justify the use of force, perjury, and illegal evictions..

Conclusion: The Hearing That Should Have Ended The Lies

Had Case 7902/22 been heard, the cycle of false claims, unlawful arrests, and orchestrated legal manipulation would have been brought to an end. Keith Broad’s refusal to allow this case to proceed confirms that he knew his version of events would not hold up under judicial scrutiny.

This chapter lays bare the abuse of the civil and criminal justice system, detailing how a legal case meant to resolve a dispute through proper channels was intentionally delayed and derailed in favour of illegal and coercive methods.

THE CHRONOLOGY: A STRUCTURED TIMELINE OF EVENTS, ATTACKS, AND SYSTEMIC CORRUPTION

The campaign against me was not an isolated series of events but a calculated, step-by-step strategy spanning multiple years, executed through coordinated legal abuse, financial sabotage, and law enforcement corruption. This chapter provides a detailed, structured chronology, broken down into three critical timelines:

The General Timeline – The key milestones in my investment, property transformation, and legal battles.
The Corruption Timeline – The systematic manipulation of law enforcement and the judicial system to orchestrate arrests and procedural abuse.
The Attacks Timeline – The direct attacks against my finances, business, liberty, and reputation.

Each timeline forms an undeniable record of how this conspiracy unfolded, backed by documented evidence, official case filings, and legal outcomes.

General Timeline: How It Started, How It Escalated

The General Timeline tracks the progression of events from initial investments to the later fabricated legal cases used as pretexts for my removal.

December 2020 – I arrived in Cape Town, intending to enter semi-retirement while transitioning to permanent residency. I began securing long-term leases to establish a stable, high-end rental portfolio.
October 2021 – The transformation of 16 Leirmans Road began, representing the largest single investment and renovation effort among the properties. The project was backed by a long-term lease to ensure financial returns on the significant upfront costs.
December 2021 – The renovation of 16 Leirmans Road was completed, with a resulting increase in rental and property values. Just days later, the first attempt to forcibly remove me occurred, revealing the landlords’ real intent: to reclaim the upgraded property without honouring the lease agreement.
Throughout 2022 – Multiple illegal evictions were orchestrated under fabricated legal pretexts, each time with the specific goal of forcing me out so the landlords could seize the financial gains of my work.
August 2022 – The first illegal arrest was orchestrated, timed deliberately to coincide with key civil court hearings. This was designed not to secure a conviction but to ensure I could not defend my legal rights, allowing the landlords and their accomplices to advance their fraudulent claims unchallenged.
December 2022 – The second illegal arrest, disguised as a legitimate immigration operation, was executed by a full SWAT team. This arrest was coordinated with ongoing civil litigation, ensuring my detention allowed the landlords to win cases in my absence.
2023 – The campaign reached its final stage, with coordinated efforts to ensure my complete financial ruin and removal from the country, all while the perpetrators illegally retained control of the properties they had already profited from.

Corruption Timeline: How Law Enforcement Enabled This Operation

This timeline details the systematic corruption that made these illegal actions possible. The role of SAPS (South African Police Service) officers, prosecutors, and private investigators in facilitating unlawful detentions and evictions is thoroughly documented.

2021-2022 – Certain SAPS (South African Police Service) officers repeatedly ignored legal protections, allowing landlords to conduct illegal evictions without court orders. Despite my leases, rental payments, and legal rights, these officers provided cover for unlawful removals and fabricated charges.
December 2021 – August 2022 – SAPS (South African Police Service) was actively complicit in multiple illegal evictions, despite clear evidence that rent was fully paid and that I had invested millions into improving the properties.
July 2022 – The first orchestrated arrest was planned, with private investigators colluding with SAPS (South African Police Service) to fabricate false charges. The sole purpose was to disrupt civil proceedings that could have prevented the unlawful seizure of my assets.
December 2022 – The second orchestrated arrest was executed, this time with a full SWAT team deployment, despite no valid legal basis for such an extreme measure. This was not a criminal operation—it was a coordinated attempt to remove me before I could legally challenge the fraudulent property claims.
Throughout 2023 – Obstruction of justice became the primary tactic, as SAPS (South African Police Service) officers and prosecutors repeatedly refused to return my passport, electronic devices, and other critical evidence, even when courts ordered their release.

This timeline proves that law enforcement was not neutral—it was an active participant in enabling illegal financial gain for private individuals.

The Attacks Timeline: How The Consortium Targeted Every Aspect Of My Life

The attacks against me were coordinated, escalating over time to ensure my complete removal.

Fabricated criminal charges were strategically timed to justify illegal arrests and detention. False charges of theft, fraud, and immigration violations were deployed, not to secure convictions, but to incarcerate me long enough for the landlords to finalize their property seizures.

Media manipulation was a core part of the strategy, with News24 and Media24 acting as extensions of the landlords’ smear campaign. Defamatory articles were published at key litigation moments to influence public perception and legal proceedings.

Financial sabotage was carried out through multiple avenues, including:

The Deliberate Withholding Of Rental Income
The Forced Cancellation Of Guest Bookings
The Fraudulent Removal Of Property Listings From Booking Platforms

The Engineering Of Financial Strain By Blocking Access To Revenue

Witness intimidation and coercion were widely employed, with former staff and business associates being threatened or pressured into signing pre-drafted affidavits against me. These false statements were then used to bolster fraudulent legal claims.
Each attack was not random—it was a key part of a structured playbook designed to manufacture a false criminal case while ensuring I was financially crippled and unable to fight back.

Conclusion: The Chronology As An Undeniable Record Of Systematic Collusion

This structured timeline of events, corruption, and attacks provides irrefutable proof of a coordinated criminal conspiracy.

The General Timeline shows how my investments improved the landlords’ financial position yet were used as a pretext for my illegal removal.
The Corruption Timeline exposes the role of SAPS (South African Police Service) officers in facilitating these fraudulent legal manoeuvres.
The Attacks Timeline lays bare the deliberate efforts to destroy my business, finances, and reputation to justify their actions.

This was not a landlord-tenant dispute, nor was it a criminal investigation based on real evidence—this was a corporate takeover masquerading as a legal process, backed by corrupt law enforcement, complicit journalists, and fraudulent court filings.

By structuring the entire operation as a multi-year campaign, the perpetrators ensured that the damage was done long before the truth could ever be exposed. However, this chronology now serves as an unassailable record of the real events, backed by evidence, dates, and indisputable facts.

EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS: THE UNFILTERED TRUTH FROM THOSE WHO LIVED IT

The events detailed in this chapter are not based on assumptions, speculation, or interpretations—they come directly from the people who witnessed the illegal operations, unlawful arrests, intimidation tactics, and orchestrated fraud firsthand. This chapter presents the independent testimonies of key eyewitnesses, individuals who had nothing to gain and everything to lose by coming forward. Despite fear of retaliation, they have provided critical firsthand evidence that dismantles the false narratives propagated by law enforcement, the landlords, and the media.

A Pattern Of Witness Intimidation And Suppression

One of the most striking elements of this case is the extent to which SAPS (South African Police Service) officers and private actors actively pressured, threatened, and manipulated witnesses to fabricate evidence. This included:

Coercion of employees and managers into signing pre-written statements, with threats of 10-30 years in prison if they refused
Suppression of exculpatory evidence, including documents and communications that contradicted the fabricated charges.
Illegal arrests and detentions of key witnesses to neutralize them as potential sources of truth.
Despite these efforts, several individuals have broken their silence to reveal what truly transpired.

Key Eyewitnesses & Their Testimonies

1. Markus (Housekeeper At 16 Leirmans Road)

Firsthand witness to the illegal raid and December 14 arrest, secretly orchestrated by Wouter de Swardt and Sergeant Stevens.
Illegally detained, handcuffed, and removed from the property—not because he was a suspect, but to facilitate an unlawful eviction.
Key Quote From Testimony: “I Was Never Charged With Anything. I Was Just Told I Was Under Arrest, Taken To Another Location, And Then Released. The Only Purpose Of My Arrest Was To Clear The House.”
Evidence: Audio recordings, WhatsApp chats, and a detailed account of his arrest reveal a meticulously planned and illegal operation designed to remove occupants and seize the property.

2. Chandre (Portfolio Manager)

Targeted for coercion by SAPS and private investigators, repeatedly threatened into signing false witness statements.
Confirmed under oath that she had no knowledge of any fraud but was pressured to state otherwise.

Key Quote From Testimony: “They Told Me I Would Be Given Immunity If I Lied, And I Would Face Decades In Prison If I Refused.”

Evidence: Audio recordings and lawyer correspondence proving SAPS’ attempts to manipulate witness testimony.

3. Ollie Sokanyile (Property Manager & Tenant At 16 Leirmans Road)

Present during both the August and December arrests, a key eyewitness to the coordinated efforts of SAPS and private actors to seize property through illegal means.
Saw police and private individuals working together to forcibly evict tenants while disguising it as a criminal operation.

Key Quote From Testimony: “They Weren’t There To Investigate A Crime. They Were There To Make Sure He Never Returned.”

Evidence: WhatsApp messages and security footage showing private actors participating in an alleged police operation.

4. Mario Boffa (Portfolio Agent)

Provided inside knowledge of the financial motives behind the unlawful operations, including embezzlement and financial fraud committed by key conspirators.
Confessed to the direct coordination between Denis Dalton, Johan Schalkwyk, Wouter de Swardt, and Sergeant Stevens to facilitate financial crimes.
Revealed plans to use torture and extreme measures to extract information about supposed hidden bank accounts and assets.

Key Quote From Testimony: “They Told Me If I Didn’t Sign Their Version Of Events, I Would Go To Prison With Him.”

Evidence: Multiple hours of recorded conversations in which he details the fraudulent nature of the allegations.

5. Anton Moller (Letting Agent For Keith Broad)

**Reveals the duplicity in the landlord’s dealings, proving that their entire legal position was built on lies and deception.
Confirms that the lease agreement and property renovations were initiated by the landlords—destroying their later claims that these were un-authorized actions.

Key Quote From Testimony: “They Told Me To Deny Everything I Knew, Even Though I Had The Contracts In My Possession.”

Evidence: Lease documents, financial records, and internal emails proving the true sequence of events.

How The Evidence Unmasks The Conspiracy

These witness accounts expose a fully coordinated, illegal operation with clear financial and legal motives:
The Arrests Were Never About Investigating a Crime.
The arrests of myself, Markus, and others were not criminal investigations but logistical moves to facilitate unlawful evictions and property seizures.
SAPS (South African Police Service) acted not as law enforcers, but as private enforcers for the landlords and their agents.

The Witness Intimidation Confirms a Cover-Up.

The aggressive coercion of multiple witnesses to align their statements with a pre-written narrative is proof that the real facts did not support the allegations.
If the allegations had been legitimate, why was it necessary to fabricate witness testimony?

The Media’s Role in Concealing the Truth.

Despite the overwhelming volume of witness evidence, News24 and other media refused to publish a single statement from any independent witnesses.
This aligns with their known practice of only publishing SAPS (South African Police Service) and landlord narratives, ensuring the truth remained suppressed.

Financial Gain Was the True Objective.

The landlords had a clear motive: the property was worth R18 million before my lease began but was relisted for R31 million after my arrest.
They never sought rent or attempted legal eviction, because their real objective was to ensure I invested money, then unlawfully remove me.
Witness testimony and financial records confirm that the fraud allegations were merely a smokescreen for what was, in reality, a calculated and profitable scheme.

Legal And Evidentiary Significance

The volume and consistency of the independent testimonies in this chapter present an insurmountable obstacle for the false case constructed against me. Unlike the statements manipulated or fabricated by SAPS (South African Police Service) and private actors:

These accounts were given voluntarily, without coercion or ulterior motives.
They are supported by physical evidence—WhatsApp messages, emails, financial records, and police dockets.
They align with each other and with the established timeline of events, further proving their credibility.

Conclusion: Eyewitness Accounts Prove The Criminality Of Those Behind This Operation

This chapter is not just a collection of testimonies—it is a critical evidentiary foundation that dismantles the case against me while exposing the full scale of criminality committed by SAPS (South African Police Service), the landlords, and their collaborators. These are not just stories; they are evidence, provided by those who witnessed the crimes in real time.

Every claim made in this case is contradicted by the very people who were there.
The only logical conclusion is that the entire case was fabricated from start to finish.
Without these witnesses, the truth would have remained buried beneath a web of lies and intimidation.

This chapter ensures that does not happen.

EYEWITNESS ACCOUNT OF THE HOUSEKEEPER: AN ILLEGAL OPERATION EXPOSED

This chapter presents the direct testimony of the housekeeper from 16 Leirmans Road, a first-hand witness to the illegal, covert operation orchestrated by Sergeant Stevens and Wouter de Swardt on December 14, 2022. His unfiltered account, backed by an audio recording, exposes the unauthorized and premeditated raid, the abduction and unlawful detention of an innocent worker, and the coordinated efforts to disguise illegal evictions as legitimate law enforcement actions.

The housekeeper's testimony is one of the most critical pieces of evidence in this case, as it provides undeniable proof that:

The arrest was never about law enforcement—it was about facilitating an illegal eviction.
Police officers worked in direct coordination with private individuals to seize a property under false pretences.
There was no legal justification for the raid, no arrest warrant, and no due process—only brute force and coercion.

This chapter provides a detailed narrative of what happened that day, drawing from the housekeeper's spoken testimony, supporting documents, and recorded conversations.

The Illegal Raid And Abduction Of The Housekeeper

On December 14, 2022, while the primary police operation was unfolding at 32 Fisherman’s Bend, a smaller, secretive operation took place at 16 Leirmans Road. This secondary operation, led by Wouter de Swardt alongside SAPS officers, was never officially recorded, had no warrant, and was not authorized by the courts.

Officers arrived under false pretences, misleading the housekeeper and other occupants into believing this was a lawful police action.
The housekeeper was forcibly detained, placed in handcuffs, and removed from the property without any explanation or legal basis.
The true purpose of the operation was not to arrest him but to remove him as an obstacle to an illegal property takeover.

The housekeeper’s testimony reveals that he was:

Detained at a separate location (32 Fisherman’s Bend), while the main raid was underway.
Questioned aggressively about my whereabouts and forced to hand over keys to the property.
Released without charge once the illegal eviction had been completed.

There was never any intention of filing charges against him—he was arrested purely to clear the house and facilitate the unlawful takeover of the property.

The Coordinated Plan: How SAPS (South African Police Service) Enabled A Private Land Grab

The covert police raid at 16 Leirmans Road was not an accident—it was part of a pre-planned and coordinated strategy.

The operation was designed to coincide with my arrest at Fisherman’s Bend, ensuring that I would be unable to respond or prevent the takeover.
While senior SAPS officers oversaw the main arrest, a separate SAPS (South African Police Service) contingent, directly influenced by Wouter de Swardt, conducted the illegal raid on Leirmans Road.
The raid had no legal basis—there was no warrant issued for the housekeeper, no legal eviction order, and no justification for the police’s presence at the property.

During the illegal operation:

Wouter de Swardt personally led SAPS (South African Police Service) officers into the house, assuming the role of a law enforcement officer despite being a private investigator.
The housekeeper was handcuffed, while the officers searched for “evidence” without any official documentation.
When the officers realized that one of the occupants was a European national, they hesitated to detain her, fearing international repercussions—confirming that they knew their actions were unlawful.

One of the most damning moments in this sequence of events is that while the housekeeper was in illegal detention, Wouter de Swardt placed a phone call to Inge Broad (the property owner), confirming that the takeover had been successful. This alone proves that the true objective was not law enforcement but the forced removal of occupants to facilitate an illegal property seizure.

No Warrant, No Legal Basis, No Accountability

The complete absence of a warrant or any legal paperwork for this operation is one of the most damning aspects of this case. The only arrest warrant issued that day was related to 32 Fisherman’s Bend—not 16 Leirmans Road.

Senior officers present at Fisherman’s Bend would have seen the warrant and known that no legal authority had been granted to conduct a raid on another property.
The separation of the police contingent into two groups proves that the illegal raid at Leirmans was a coordinated action, not an oversight.
Wouter de Swardt’s role in leading the raid, despite being a private citizen, confirms that this was a staged operation designed to benefit private interests.

There was no due process—this was a criminal act disguised as law enforcement, and it only succeeded because of the complete collusion of SAPS (South African Police Service) officers willing to act outside the law.

The Housekeeper’s Account: The Larger Implications

The housekeeper’s experience is not just a personal testimony—it is a critical piece of evidence that exposes the widespread corruption behind these events.

His testimony reveals how private individuals manipulated SAPS (South African Police Service) officers into conducting illegal operations.
His detention proves that SAPS (South African Police Service) was complicit in using force and intimidation to enable private financial gain.
The absence of any legal justification confirms that this was never a lawful eviction, but a premeditated act of theft disguised as police action.

The psychological and physical intimidation he endured is further evidence of the abusive tactics used throughout this conspiracy. He was:

Arrested without charge, detained without cause, and released without explanation.
Treated as a disposable pawn in a much larger scheme to facilitate an illegal eviction.
Forced to witness the immediate transition of the property into the hands of new occupants, proving that the operation was planned well in advance.

Conclusion: A Textbook Case Of Abuse Of Power

The events at 16 Leirmans Road on December 14, 2022, as described in the housekeeper’s testimony, reveal a textbook case of corruption, collusion, and abuse of power.

The illegal raid and arrest were not isolated incidents—they were part of a coordinated strategy to forcefully seize property without legal basis.
The use of SAPS (South African Police Service) officers as enforcers for private individuals exposes a deep-rooted failure of law enforcement integrity.
The complete absence of legal documentation confirms that this was an extra-legal operation executed with total impunity.

The housekeeper’s testimony, combined with recorded conversations and supporting documentation, serves as one of the most compelling pieces of evidence in this case, proving that:

The arrest at Fisherman’s Bend and the illegal raid at Leirmans Road were part of a single, premeditated conspiracy.
SAPS (South African Police Service) officers knowingly participated in illegal activities under the direct influence of private interests.
The true objective was to remove all opposition to an unlawful property takeover—not to uphold the law.

This chapter cements the reality that law enforcement was not acting in service of justice, but in service of private financial agendas. The housekeeper’s voice—silenced on the day of the operation—now stands as a damning indictment of the corruption that allowed this to happen.

NEXT CHAPTER ...

CHAPTER SUMMARIES PART 3:

The Truth Suid Afrika

Discover the untold stories behind the false headlines of the Media24 articles. Uncover the truth behind the fabricated content of those articles. Understand the motivation that powered the consortium's actions.

'CHAPTER SUMMARIES' - READ MORE

Screenshot 2025-03-10 001101_edited_edited_edited_edited_Compressed_edited.jpg

JUSTICE 3i_edited_edited_edited_edited_edited_edited_Compressed_edited_Compressed.jpg

"Truth has power. And if we all gravitate toward similar ideas, maybe we do so because those ideas are true and written deep within us." - Richard Bach

CHAPTER SUMMARIES PART TWO: WOUTER DE SWARDT & SAPS CRIMINALITY & CORRUPTION